"
Team:Bielefeld-Germany/Public Relations/Public Discussion
From 2010.igem.org
(→Public Events) |
(→Public Events) |
||
| Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
[[Image:Bielefeld sc3.JPG|200px|left|thumb|The audience]] | [[Image:Bielefeld sc3.JPG|200px|left|thumb|The audience]] | ||
| - | Additionally to the talks, we arranged an info point with laboratory stuff like pipettes, tipes, gloves and shaking flaks. We presented a poster about our project, in order to adress more information to the auditorium. People should get an inside | + | Additionally to the talks, we arranged an info point with laboratory stuff like pipettes, tipes, gloves and shaking flaks. We presented a poster about our project, in order to adress more information to the auditorium. People should get an inside into our work and the practical lab work behind. We observed that most of the people preferably asked question in a personal discussion with the iGEM Team members at the info point. We tried to feed information and positive examples of synthetic biology to the people, in order to rearrange their image of synthetic biology and genetics. This is quite important, because: |
<u>Quote of Michael Spector </u> ([https://2010.igem.org/Security iGEM security page]) | <u>Quote of Michael Spector </u> ([https://2010.igem.org/Security iGEM security page]) | ||
| Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
''"It is a debate about words, about metaphors - it is ideology, it is not science... It is law, it is morality, it is patent stuff. Science in not a company. It is not a country. It is not even an idea. It is a process; some times it works and some times it does not. The idea we should not allow science to do it's job, because we are afraid, is really deadening and it is preventing millions of people from prospering."'' | ''"It is a debate about words, about metaphors - it is ideology, it is not science... It is law, it is morality, it is patent stuff. Science in not a company. It is not a country. It is not even an idea. It is a process; some times it works and some times it does not. The idea we should not allow science to do it's job, because we are afraid, is really deadening and it is preventing millions of people from prospering."'' | ||
| - | Michael Spector describes the impressions people often | + | Michael Spector describes the impressions people often convey in the context of genetics and biology. Moreover he mentioned a very important attribute of science. Science is not political! Unfortunately science gets political involved in the moment, it discovers improvements of everyday life or solves problems of mankind. Therefore the political aspect has to be discussed. Not surprising, frequently asked questions out of the auditorium concerned all kind of biological, political and safety topics. It reflected that people still are afraid of hidden risks, especially in genetics: |
| - | :*Can I control everything | + | :*Can I control everything I am able to do in the lab? |
:*Is it possible for the bacteria to get out of the lab? | :*Is it possible for the bacteria to get out of the lab? | ||
:*What is the differnce between synthetic biology and genetics? | :*What is the differnce between synthetic biology and genetics? | ||
:*How do I work on a molecular level? What kind of tools are used for cutting and pasting DNA? | :*How do I work on a molecular level? What kind of tools are used for cutting and pasting DNA? | ||
:*Do I really need a test on spiciness? | :*Do I really need a test on spiciness? | ||
| - | :*Can science be more than just an interim solution? Can we rule out the | + | :*Can science be more than just an interim solution? Can we rule out the origin of most problems through scientific improvement? Do starving people in foreign countries really get the improvements of green biotechnology or is there only a company profit? |
| - | People recognized that we are aware of possible safety and ethic issues. We pointed out that we modificated an already as security stage 1 | + | People recognized that we are aware of possible safety and ethic issues. We pointed out that we modificated an organism already categorized as security stage 1. So we are aware of the hazard potential of final molecular products. After some detailled description people understood that we did not build a risky bacteria by choice. Further they noted that building DNA devices out of BioBricks is a lot of experimental work. |
| - | Some people tried to lead the conversation on political topics. The connection between the potential of genetics and synthethic biology and politics is quite obvious. The research might invent something that | + | Some people tried to lead the conversation on political topics. The connection between the potential of genetics and synthethic biology and politics is quite obvious. The research might invent something that targets on help for people all around the world. Therefore it has to be discussed in a global context, how these inventions can be used by anybody. |
| - | It was really exciting for us to get | + | It was really exciting for us to get insight in the publics opinion on safety, ethics and biological issues. We discussed a long time after the talks with different persons of different social groups. |
| Line 83: | Line 83: | ||
'''Waffles:''' | '''Waffles:''' | ||
| - | We killed two birds with one stone by feeding the students of the bielefeld university with waffles and | + | We killed two birds with one stone by feeding the students of the bielefeld university with waffles and knowledge. For this porpuse we build up an infopoint with a poster and sold waffles. A lot of students took time to study our project, eat a waffle and ask questions concerning the iGEM competition and our project. It was a lot of fun for us and more important it was quite delicious. |
[[Image:Bielefeld Waffeln.JPG|200px|right|thumb|Feeding Bielefeld]] | [[Image:Bielefeld Waffeln.JPG|200px|right|thumb|Feeding Bielefeld]] | ||
[[Image:Bielefeld Waffeln2.JPG|200px|left|thumb|Timo is discussing our project]] [[Image:Bielefeld Waffel2.JPG|200px|center|thumb|Simon convincing students about our projects with the help of our poster]] | [[Image:Bielefeld Waffeln2.JPG|200px|left|thumb|Timo is discussing our project]] [[Image:Bielefeld Waffel2.JPG|200px|center|thumb|Simon convincing students about our projects with the help of our poster]] | ||
Revision as of 19:49, 27 October 2010
Public Discussion
Public Relation is one of the keynotes of the iGEM competition. The goal is to access science to the public. This is especially important in the German speaking area, where the broad public has above-average concerns about biotechnology. Terms like "synthetic biology", "mutation" or "directed evolution" have unusal bad connotations in the German culture.
Public articles
In order to get more people in touch with the competition, we created the first german Wikipedia article. We appreciate all the slight corrections done by all the unknown wikipedia reviewers.
- We created the first german iGEM wikipedia article
[http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/IGEM iGEM Wiki Article]
Public Events
Science Café, Ratscafé KaffeeKunst, Bielefeld 10/26/2010:
Access scientific issues to the public is one of our main keynotes during the project. Hence we did a public discussion concerning synthetic biology. For this porpuse we presented our project after a brief introduction of synthetic biology given by [http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alfred_P%C3%BChler Prof. Alfred Pühler], one of the German pioneers of genetics. After the talks there was an open discussion hosted by the chief of editorial of the local radio broadcaster "radio bielefeld". The event took place in an ambient café in the center of Bielefeld.
Additionally to the talks, we arranged an info point with laboratory stuff like pipettes, tipes, gloves and shaking flaks. We presented a poster about our project, in order to adress more information to the auditorium. People should get an inside into our work and the practical lab work behind. We observed that most of the people preferably asked question in a personal discussion with the iGEM Team members at the info point. We tried to feed information and positive examples of synthetic biology to the people, in order to rearrange their image of synthetic biology and genetics. This is quite important, because:
Quote of Michael Spector (iGEM security page)
"It is a debate about words, about metaphors - it is ideology, it is not science... It is law, it is morality, it is patent stuff. Science in not a company. It is not a country. It is not even an idea. It is a process; some times it works and some times it does not. The idea we should not allow science to do it's job, because we are afraid, is really deadening and it is preventing millions of people from prospering."
Michael Spector describes the impressions people often convey in the context of genetics and biology. Moreover he mentioned a very important attribute of science. Science is not political! Unfortunately science gets political involved in the moment, it discovers improvements of everyday life or solves problems of mankind. Therefore the political aspect has to be discussed. Not surprising, frequently asked questions out of the auditorium concerned all kind of biological, political and safety topics. It reflected that people still are afraid of hidden risks, especially in genetics:
- Can I control everything I am able to do in the lab?
- Is it possible for the bacteria to get out of the lab?
- What is the differnce between synthetic biology and genetics?
- How do I work on a molecular level? What kind of tools are used for cutting and pasting DNA?
- Do I really need a test on spiciness?
- Can science be more than just an interim solution? Can we rule out the origin of most problems through scientific improvement? Do starving people in foreign countries really get the improvements of green biotechnology or is there only a company profit?
People recognized that we are aware of possible safety and ethic issues. We pointed out that we modificated an organism already categorized as security stage 1. So we are aware of the hazard potential of final molecular products. After some detailled description people understood that we did not build a risky bacteria by choice. Further they noted that building DNA devices out of BioBricks is a lot of experimental work.
Some people tried to lead the conversation on political topics. The connection between the potential of genetics and synthethic biology and politics is quite obvious. The research might invent something that targets on help for people all around the world. Therefore it has to be discussed in a global context, how these inventions can be used by anybody.
It was really exciting for us to get insight in the publics opinion on safety, ethics and biological issues. We discussed a long time after the talks with different persons of different social groups.
weblinks und References:
[http://www.bielefeld.de/de/kf/veranstaltungen/kalender/detailanzeigen.html?id=2010-01-12-11.05.45.727686 Science café advertisment]
[http://www.bio-owl.de/php/start.php Advertisment on Bio OWL (14.10.2010)]
[http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alfred_P%C3%BChler Wikipedia Prof. Alfred Pühler (German article)]
Waffles:
We killed two birds with one stone by feeding the students of the bielefeld university with waffles and knowledge. For this porpuse we build up an infopoint with a poster and sold waffles. A lot of students took time to study our project, eat a waffle and ask questions concerning the iGEM competition and our project. It was a lot of fun for us and more important it was quite delicious.
