Team:British Columbia/Project Biofilm

From 2010.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
Line 14: Line 14:
<br></br><center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/c/c4/Picture_9.png" width=600px></src></center>
<br></br><center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/c/c4/Picture_9.png" width=600px></src></center>
<br><h3>Results & Discussion</h3></br>
<br><h3>Results & Discussion</h3></br>
 +
<p>
<br></br><center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/d/d6/BFIlmGraph.jpg" width=600px></src></center>
<br></br><center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/d/d6/BFIlmGraph.jpg" width=600px></src></center>

Revision as of 20:08, 24 October 2010



Introduction

The biofilm sub-team has obtained a growth curve plotting the biofilm growth of S. aureus RN4220 and 8325-4 strains at 3 to 30 hour incubation times. This basic growth curve can be used for comparison with growth curves under conditions where the biofilm is exposed to DspB only, the phage only, or DspB integrated into the phage. RN4220 is a S. aureus strain without a prophage and 8325-4 is a S. aureus strain that has been cured of phage Փ11, Փ12, and Փ13; both strains were selected based on their susceptibility to phage Փ13. The biofilm data collected has additionally been incorporated into the Modelling sub-team simulation to predict the effect of the synthetic phage on Staphylococcus aureus biofilm growth.


Approach

The biofilm subteam obtained the majority of their results from optical density readings (OD absorbance at 550nm) by a Tecan plate reader. Differing variables were tested initially, which determined that both RN4220 and 8325-4 strains displayed greater growth (higher OD readings) when innoculated into a 96-well flat bottomed plate with a solution of 1%-glucose tryptic soy broth.

After these conditions for growth were established, the innoculated 96-well flat bottomed plates were incubated at various times ranging from 3 to 30 hours at 37 degrees Celsius. After incubation, the innoculated wells were subjected to a 3 x 300ul wash with phosphate buffer saline solution to maintain a stable pH and rinse away cells that were not adhered to the biofilm aggregate. Heat fixation followed to adhere the biofilm to the 96-well plate and inhibit further growth. Subsequent staining of the cells with crystal violet dye allowed for OD readings of the biofilm which produced data for the growth curve.




Results & Discussion