"
Team:British Columbia/Project QS
From 2010.igem.org
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
<p>Therefore, we decided to use an agr operon null strain SH 1001 (Thoendel and Horswill, 2009). Without AgrA and AgrC, it is not possible for the host to detect AIP and so it was decided that agrAC would be cloned onto a plasmid and inserted into placed into SH1001 via electroporation <link to paper protocol?>. To remove auto-catalytic activity, agrAC would be placed under the control of a constitutive promoter. It was hoped that a steady state of agr AC would exist after time. P2-GFP constructs (including negative and positive controls, as defined above) would be cloned onto the same plasmid and placed also into SH1001. AIP concentration could then be varied and P2 activity would be directly related to AIP concentration. </p><br/> | <p>Therefore, we decided to use an agr operon null strain SH 1001 (Thoendel and Horswill, 2009). Without AgrA and AgrC, it is not possible for the host to detect AIP and so it was decided that agrAC would be cloned onto a plasmid and inserted into placed into SH1001 via electroporation <link to paper protocol?>. To remove auto-catalytic activity, agrAC would be placed under the control of a constitutive promoter. It was hoped that a steady state of agr AC would exist after time. P2-GFP constructs (including negative and positive controls, as defined above) would be cloned onto the same plasmid and placed also into SH1001. AIP concentration could then be varied and P2 activity would be directly related to AIP concentration. </p><br/> | ||
| - | <p>Primers <separate page?> were designed to PCR off agrAC including its associated ribosomal binding sites. Even though it was possible to PCR off agrAC, as shown through the correct band size after gel electrophoresis, the process of cloning agrAC onto biobrick plasmids pSB1C3 and psB13 failed. Therefore, to complete the project, it was decided to reduce the scope of the track to showing if the Biobrick P2 part works or not. The promoter-reporter constructs were electroporated into RN4220 (derived from NCTC 8325; mutated and selected for compatibility with restriction sites and <i>E. coli</i> DNA). It is expected that the host containing the P2 construct will show increased fluorescence over time as its natural agr system activates | + | <p>Primers <separate page?> were designed to PCR off agrAC including its associated ribosomal binding sites. Even though it was possible to PCR off agrAC, as shown through the correct band size after gel electrophoresis, the process of cloning agrAC onto biobrick plasmids pSB1C3 and psB13 failed. Therefore, to complete the project, it was decided to reduce the scope of the track to showing if the Biobrick P2 part works or not. The promoter-reporter constructs were electroporated into RN4220 (derived from NCTC 8325; mutated and selected for compatibility with restriction sites and <i>E. coli</i> DNA). It is expected that the host containing the P2 construct will show increased fluorescence over time as its natural agr system activates. Comparing the fluorescence of the P2 construct with the negative and positive controls should result in useable data that future iGEM teams will appreciate. Biobrick plasmids were not used in this case, as it lacks replication genes for replication in <i>S. aureus</i>. Novick Lab’s pCN33 (Charpentier, <i>et al. </I>, 2004) will be used instead. This plasmid contains both <i>E. coli</i> and <i>S. aureus</i> replicons and also erythromycin and ampicillin resistance genes. The multiple cloning site region of pCN33 is compatible with EcoRI and PstI sites in Biobricks. In other words, it can serve as a final expression vector for Biobrick parts with <i>S. aureus</i> as a host. </P><br/> |
| + | |||
| + | As a side project, primers were designed to PCR and clone the replicon of pCN33 as a BioBrick part. This would allow the use of registry parts with </i>S. aureus</i> as a host. However, due to time constraints, this potential new part was not made. | ||
<br><h3>Results & Discussion</h3></br> | <br><h3>Results & Discussion</h3></br> | ||
Revision as of 04:29, 25 October 2010
Introduction
The goal of the Quorum Sensing sub-team is to characterize the P2 promoter (BBa_I746104). This promoter controls the transcription of the agr operon found naturally in S. aureus (Novick et al., 1995). The agr operon itself is involved in the quorum sensing activity of S. aureus. Bioflm activity is affected by this quorum sensing. AgrC is a transmembrane protein that detects auto-inducing peptides (AIP) and then phosphorylates AgrA. The phosphorylated AgrA can then induce P2 promoter activity, leading to transcription of the agr operon. The precursor of AIP, AgrD is a straight-chain polypeptide that is circularized and exported out of the cell by AgrB. The agr operon is therefore an auto-catalytic system: the presence of AIP initiates P2 promoter activity which leads to synthesis of more AIP (Lyon et al., 2000).
A better understanding of P2 promoter activity in the presence of AIP can therefore lead to a rational design and prediction of P2-regulated viral and DspB production in the presence of a S. aureus biofilm.
Approach
As was common in other iGEM projects, we tried to measure P2 activity based on the production of green fluorescent protein (GFP e.g. BBa_E0040) over time. A negative control of GFP under the control of a Pbad promoter (BBa_I13453) will be used. A positive control of GFP under the control of a constitutive promoter (J23100) will be used. All other parts were kept the same: RBS (BBa_B0034), terminator (BBa_B0015) and GFP (BBa_E0040 and BBa_I145015). Fluorescence can be used via FACS.
There were several difficulties in trying to characterize the P2 promoter:(i) the agr operon is already present in most S. aureus strains and (ii) the auto-catalytic agr system makes it difficult to relate P2 activity directly to AIP concentration.
Therefore, we decided to use an agr operon null strain SH 1001 (Thoendel and Horswill, 2009). Without AgrA and AgrC, it is not possible for the host to detect AIP and so it was decided that agrAC would be cloned onto a plasmid and inserted into placed into SH1001 via electroporation . To remove auto-catalytic activity, agrAC would be placed under the control of a constitutive promoter. It was hoped that a steady state of agr AC would exist after time. P2-GFP constructs (including negative and positive controls, as defined above) would be cloned onto the same plasmid and placed also into SH1001. AIP concentration could then be varied and P2 activity would be directly related to AIP concentration.
Primers
As a side project, primers were designed to PCR and clone the replicon of pCN33 as a BioBrick part. This would allow the use of registry parts with S. aureus as a host. However, due to time constraints, this potential new part was not made.
Results & Discussion
References
Charpentier, et al.. Novel Cassette-Based Shuttle Vector System for Gram-Positive Bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004 October; 70(10): 6076–6085.
Novick R P; Projan S J; Kornblum J; Ross H F; Ji G; Kreiswirth B; Vandenesch F; Moghazeh S The agr P2 operon: an autocatalytic sensory transduction system in Staphylococcus aureus. Molecular & general genetics : MGG 1995;248(4):446-58.
Gholson J. Lyon, Patricia Mayville, Tom W. Muir, and Richard P. Novick. Rational design of a global inhibitor of the virulence response in Staphylococcus aureus, based in part on localization of the site of inhibition to the receptor-histidine kinase, AgrC. PNAS. 2000; 97 (24): 13330-35.
Matthew Thoendel and Alexander R. Horswill. Identification of Staphylococcus aureus AgrD Residues Required for Autoinducing Peptide Biosynthesis. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2009. 284, 21828-21838.
