Team:British Columbia/Project QS

From 2010.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
 
(29 intermediate revisions not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:
<div id="super_main_wrapper">
<div id="super_main_wrapper">
-
<div id="SubWrapper">   
+
<div id="SubWrapper">  <br/>
<h3>Introduction</h3>
<h3>Introduction</h3>
-
<p>The goal of the Quorum Sensing sub-team is to characterize the P2 promoter (BBa_I746104). This promoter controls the transcription of the agr operon found naturally in S. aureus (Novick <i>et al.</i>, 1995). The agr operon itself is involved in the quorum sensing activity of <i>S. aureus</i>. Bioflm activity is affected by this quorum sensing. AgrC is a transmembrane protein that detects auto-inducing peptides (AIP) and then phosphorylates AgrA. The phosphorylated AgrA can then induce P2 promoter activity, leading to transcription of the agr operon. The precursor of AIP, AgrD is a straight-chain polypeptide that is circularized and exported out of the cell by AgrB. The agr operon is therefore an auto-catalytic system: the presence of AIP initiates P2 promoter activity which leads to synthesis of more AIP (Lyon <i>et al.</i>, 2000).
+
<p>The goal of the Quorum Sensing sub-team is to characterize the P2 promoter (BBa_I746104). This promoter controls the transcription of the agr operon found naturally in S. aureus (Novick <i>et al.</i>, 1995). The agr operon itself is involved in the quorum sensing activity of <i>S. aureus</i>. Bioflm activity is affected by this quorum sensing. AgrC is a transmembrane protein that detects auto-inducing peptides (AIP) and then phosphorylates AgrA. The phosphorylated AgrA can then induce P2 promoter activity, leading to transcription of the agr operon. The precursor of AIP, AgrD is a straight-chain polypeptide that is circularized and exported out of the cell by AgrB. The agr operon is therefore an auto-catalytic system: the presence of AIP initiates P2 promoter activity which leads to synthesis of more AIP (Lyon <i>et al.</i>, 2000).</p><br/><p>
 +
A better understanding of P2 promoter activity in the presence of AIP can therefore lead to a rational design and prediction of P2-regulated viral and DspB production in the presence of a <i>S. aureus</i> biofilm.</p><br/>
<center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/6/6c/Qsschema.jpg"></src></center>
<center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/6/6c/Qsschema.jpg"></src></center>
-
A better understanding of P2 promoter activity in the presence of AIP can therefore lead to a rational design and prediction of P2-regulated viral and DspB production in the presence of a <i>S. aureus</i> biofilm.</p>
+
 
<br/>
<br/>
<h3>Approach</h3>
<h3>Approach</h3>
-
<p>As is common in other iGEM projects, P2 activity will be measured based on the production of green fluorescent protein (GFP e.g. BBa_E0040) over time. A negative control of GFP under the control of a Pbad promoter (BBa_I13453) will be used. A positive control of GFP under the control of a constitutive promoter (J23100) will be used. All other parts will be kept the same: RBS, terminator and GFP. FACS will be used to detect fluorescence.</p><br/>
+
<p>As is common in other iGEM projects, we aimed to measure P2 (I764104) activity based on the production of green fluorescent protein (GFP) over time. Our negative control was the arabinose-inducible Pbad promoter (BBa_I13453) and our positive control was a constitutive promoter (J23100). Our promoter-reporter constructs consisted of their respective promoters and the following parts: RBS (BBa_B0034), GFP (BBa_E0040 and BBa_I145015) and terminator (BBa_B0015). See parts BBa_K391009 and BBa_K391001 for more information. Fluorescence could be analysed via FACS.</p><br/>
-
<p>The reason why AIP production is not used to measure promoter activity is because (i) the agr operon is already present in most <i>S. aureus</i> strains and (ii) the auto-catalytic agr system makes it difficult to relate P2 activity directly to AIP concentration. Furthermore, available </i>S. aureus</i> strains that lack AgrB are pathogenic, which presents an obstacle to their usage. </p><br/>
+
<center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/f/f1/UbcigemQScons.png"></src></center><br/>
-
<p>Therefore, we decided to use an agr operon null strain SH 1001 (<insert Horswill reference>). Without AgrA and AgrC, it is not possible for the host to detect AIP and so it was decided that agrAC would be cloned onto a plasmid and inserted into placed into SH1001 via electroporation <link to paper protocol?>. To remove auto-catalytic activity, agrAC would be placed under the control of a constitutive promoter. It was hoped that a steady state of agr AC would exist after time. P2-GFP constructs (including negative and positive controls, as defined above) would be cloned onto the same plasmid and placed also into SH1001. AIP concentration could then be varied and P2 activity would be directly related to AIP concentration. </p>
+
<p>There were several difficulties in trying to characterize the P2 promoter:(i) the agr operon is already present in most <i>S. aureus</i> strains and (ii) the auto-catalytic agr system makes it difficult to relate P2 activity directly to AIP concentration. </p><br/>
-
<p>Primers <separate page?> were designed to PCR off agrAC including its associated ribosomal binding sites. Even though it was possible to PCR off agrAC, as shown through the correct band size after gel electrophoresis, the process of cloning agrAC onto biobrick plasmids pSB1C3 and psB13 failed. Therefore, to complete the project, it was decided to reduce the scope of the track to showing if the Biobrick P2 part works or not. The promoter-reporter constructs were electroporated into RN4220 (derived from NCTC 8325; mutated and selected for compatibility with restriction sites and <i>E. coli</i> DNA). It is expected that the host containing the P2 construct will show increased fluorescence over time as its natural agr system activates. Most of this increase should occur in the early exponential growth phase of the host, since AIP production ramps up most appreciably during this phase. Comparing the fluorescence of the P2 construct with the negative and positive controls should result in useable data that future iGEM teams will appreciate. Biobrick plasmids were not used in this case, as it lacks replication genes for replication in <i>S. aureus</i>. Novick Lab’s pCN33 (Charpentier, <i>et al. </I>, 2004) will be used instead. This plasmid contains both <i>E. coli</i> and <i>S. aureus</i> replicons and also erythromycin and ampicillin resistance genes. The multiple cloning site region of pCN33 is compatible with EcoRI and PstI sites in Biobricks. In other words, it can serve as a final expression vector for Biobrick parts with <i>S. aureus</i> as a host. </P
+
<p>Therefore, we decided to use an agr operon null strain SH1001 (Thoendel and Horswill, 2009) that lacks the ability to synthesize AIP since it is agrB- and agrD-. To allow the host to detect AIP, we tried to clone the genes encoding AgrA and AgrC onto a plasmid and transform them into SH1001. To remove auto-catalytic activity, these genes would be placed under the control of a constitutive promoter to obtain a steady state of AgrA and AgrC. The previously described promoter-reporter constructs would be cloned onto the same plasmid as the genes for AgrA and AgrC and transformed into SH1001. AIP concentration could then be controllably varied and P2 activity could be directly related to AIP concentration. Primers (BBa_K391002 and BBa_K391003) were designed to PCR the genes for AgrA and AgrC including their associated ribosomal binding sites. The PCR was successful as shown by the correct band size after gel electrophoresis. However, we were not able to clone these onto biobrick plasmids pSB1C3 and psB13 for unknown reasons.</p><br/>
-
<br><h3><b>Results</b></h3></br>
+
<p>Therefore, to complete the project, we decided to reduce the scope of the track to showing if the Biobrick P2 part works. The promoter-reporter constructs were electroporated into <i>S. aureus </i>strain RN4220 (derived from NCTC 8325; mutated and selected for compatibility with restriction sites and <i>E. coli</i> DNA). It was expected that the host containing the P2 construct would show increased fluorescence over time due to its natural agr system. This also presented an opportunity to characterize Pbad and the constitutive promoter in <i>S. aureus</i>. Biobrick plasmids were not used as they lack the <i>S. aureus</i> replicon and replication genes. The Novick lab’s pCN33 plasmid (Charpentier, <i>et al. </I>, 2004) was used. pCN33 contains both <i>E. coli</i> and <i>S. aureus</i> replicons alongside erythromycin and ampicillin resistance genes. Its multiple cloning site (MCS) region is compatible with EcoRI and PstI sites in Biobricks. In other words, it can serve as a final expression vector for Biobrick parts with <i>S. aureus</i> as a host. </P><br/>
-
<br><h3><b>Discussion</b></h3></br>
+
<p>From this work, we realized the utility of obtaining different bacterial plasmid replicons as Biobrick parts to facilitate the characterization of parts across an increasing range of hosts. Thus, as a side project, primers (BBa_K391004 and BBa_K391005)were designed to PCR and clone the replicon of pCN33 as a BioBrick part. However, due to time constraints and insufficient manpower, this potential new part has not been made.<p><br/>
 +
<h3>Results & Discussion</h3>
-
*temporary storage location for references
+
<p>The Quorum-Sensing sub-team created promoter-reporter constructs for P2, Pbad and a constitutive promoter that will allow promoter characterization in <i>E. coli</i> and <i>S. aureus</i>. These have been submitted to the Registry as composite parts. We have attempted to clone genes for AgrA and AgrC as Biobrick parts, with the aim of constructing an AgrAC+agrBD- <i>S. aureus</i> strain. To overcome the obstacle of expressing Biobrick plasmids in <i>S. aureus</i>, we have obtained the <i>S. aureus</i> pCN33 plasmid with a MCS region compatible with Biobrick EcoRI and PstI sites. Additionally, we have submitted our primers for the PCR and cloning of the <i>S. aureus</i> replicon. Although we have not been able to characterize the promoters in <i>S. aureus</i>, our work establishes a foundation for expanding the range of hosts that Biobrick parts can be expressed and characterized in.
-
*Charpentier, <i>et al.<i>. Novel Cassette-Based Shuttle Vector System for Gram-Positive Bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004 October; 70(10): 6076–6085.  
+
 
-
*Novick R P; Projan S J; Kornblum J; Ross H F; Ji G; Kreiswirth B; Vandenesch F; Moghazeh S
+
 
 +
</div> <!-- end SubWrapper -->
 +
 
 +
<div id="news" style="height:2050px;">
 +
<br/>
 +
<center>
 +
<h3>References</h3>
 +
<p>
 +
Charpentier, <i>et al.</i>. Novel Cassette-Based Shuttle Vector System for Gram-Positive Bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004 October; 70(10): 6076–6085. </p><p>
 +
Novick R P; Projan S J; Kornblum J; Ross H F; Ji G; Kreiswirth B; Vandenesch F; Moghazeh S
The agr P2 operon: an autocatalytic sensory transduction system in Staphylococcus aureus.
The agr P2 operon: an autocatalytic sensory transduction system in Staphylococcus aureus.
-
Molecular & general genetics : MGG 1995;248(4):446-58.
+
Molecular & general genetics : MGG 1995;248(4):446-58.</p><p>
-
*Gholson J. Lyon, Patricia Mayville, Tom W. Muir, and Richard P. Novick. Rational design of a global inhibitor of the virulence
+
Gholson J. Lyon, Patricia Mayville, Tom W. Muir, and Richard P. Novick. Rational design of a global inhibitor of the virulence
response in Staphylococcus aureus, based in part on
response in Staphylococcus aureus, based in part on
localization of the site of inhibition to the
localization of the site of inhibition to the
-
receptor-histidine kinase, AgrC. PNAS. 2000; 97 (24): 13330-35.
+
receptor-histidine kinase, AgrC. PNAS. 2000; 97 (24): 13330-35.</p>
-
</div> <!-- end SubWrapper -->
+
<p>Matthew Thoendel and Alexander R. Horswill. Identification of Staphylococcus aureus AgrD Residues Required for Autoinducing Peptide Biosynthesis. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2009. 284, 21828-21838.
-
 
+
-
<div id="news" style="height:1500px;">
+
-
<br></br>
+
-
<ul>
+
-
</ul>
+
</div>   
</div>   

Latest revision as of 15:13, 27 October 2010



Introduction

The goal of the Quorum Sensing sub-team is to characterize the P2 promoter (BBa_I746104). This promoter controls the transcription of the agr operon found naturally in S. aureus (Novick et al., 1995). The agr operon itself is involved in the quorum sensing activity of S. aureus. Bioflm activity is affected by this quorum sensing. AgrC is a transmembrane protein that detects auto-inducing peptides (AIP) and then phosphorylates AgrA. The phosphorylated AgrA can then induce P2 promoter activity, leading to transcription of the agr operon. The precursor of AIP, AgrD is a straight-chain polypeptide that is circularized and exported out of the cell by AgrB. The agr operon is therefore an auto-catalytic system: the presence of AIP initiates P2 promoter activity which leads to synthesis of more AIP (Lyon et al., 2000).


A better understanding of P2 promoter activity in the presence of AIP can therefore lead to a rational design and prediction of P2-regulated viral and DspB production in the presence of a S. aureus biofilm.



Approach

As is common in other iGEM projects, we aimed to measure P2 (I764104) activity based on the production of green fluorescent protein (GFP) over time. Our negative control was the arabinose-inducible Pbad promoter (BBa_I13453) and our positive control was a constitutive promoter (J23100). Our promoter-reporter constructs consisted of their respective promoters and the following parts: RBS (BBa_B0034), GFP (BBa_E0040 and BBa_I145015) and terminator (BBa_B0015). See parts BBa_K391009 and BBa_K391001 for more information. Fluorescence could be analysed via FACS.



There were several difficulties in trying to characterize the P2 promoter:(i) the agr operon is already present in most S. aureus strains and (ii) the auto-catalytic agr system makes it difficult to relate P2 activity directly to AIP concentration.


Therefore, we decided to use an agr operon null strain SH1001 (Thoendel and Horswill, 2009) that lacks the ability to synthesize AIP since it is agrB- and agrD-. To allow the host to detect AIP, we tried to clone the genes encoding AgrA and AgrC onto a plasmid and transform them into SH1001. To remove auto-catalytic activity, these genes would be placed under the control of a constitutive promoter to obtain a steady state of AgrA and AgrC. The previously described promoter-reporter constructs would be cloned onto the same plasmid as the genes for AgrA and AgrC and transformed into SH1001. AIP concentration could then be controllably varied and P2 activity could be directly related to AIP concentration. Primers (BBa_K391002 and BBa_K391003) were designed to PCR the genes for AgrA and AgrC including their associated ribosomal binding sites. The PCR was successful as shown by the correct band size after gel electrophoresis. However, we were not able to clone these onto biobrick plasmids pSB1C3 and psB13 for unknown reasons.


Therefore, to complete the project, we decided to reduce the scope of the track to showing if the Biobrick P2 part works. The promoter-reporter constructs were electroporated into S. aureus strain RN4220 (derived from NCTC 8325; mutated and selected for compatibility with restriction sites and E. coli DNA). It was expected that the host containing the P2 construct would show increased fluorescence over time due to its natural agr system. This also presented an opportunity to characterize Pbad and the constitutive promoter in S. aureus. Biobrick plasmids were not used as they lack the S. aureus replicon and replication genes. The Novick lab’s pCN33 plasmid (Charpentier, et al. , 2004) was used. pCN33 contains both E. coli and S. aureus replicons alongside erythromycin and ampicillin resistance genes. Its multiple cloning site (MCS) region is compatible with EcoRI and PstI sites in Biobricks. In other words, it can serve as a final expression vector for Biobrick parts with S. aureus as a host.


From this work, we realized the utility of obtaining different bacterial plasmid replicons as Biobrick parts to facilitate the characterization of parts across an increasing range of hosts. Thus, as a side project, primers (BBa_K391004 and BBa_K391005)were designed to PCR and clone the replicon of pCN33 as a BioBrick part. However, due to time constraints and insufficient manpower, this potential new part has not been made.


Results & Discussion

The Quorum-Sensing sub-team created promoter-reporter constructs for P2, Pbad and a constitutive promoter that will allow promoter characterization in E. coli and S. aureus. These have been submitted to the Registry as composite parts. We have attempted to clone genes for AgrA and AgrC as Biobrick parts, with the aim of constructing an AgrAC+agrBD- S. aureus strain. To overcome the obstacle of expressing Biobrick plasmids in S. aureus, we have obtained the S. aureus pCN33 plasmid with a MCS region compatible with Biobrick EcoRI and PstI sites. Additionally, we have submitted our primers for the PCR and cloning of the S. aureus replicon. Although we have not been able to characterize the promoters in S. aureus, our work establishes a foundation for expanding the range of hosts that Biobrick parts can be expressed and characterized in.


References

Charpentier, et al.. Novel Cassette-Based Shuttle Vector System for Gram-Positive Bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004 October; 70(10): 6076–6085.

Novick R P; Projan S J; Kornblum J; Ross H F; Ji G; Kreiswirth B; Vandenesch F; Moghazeh S The agr P2 operon: an autocatalytic sensory transduction system in Staphylococcus aureus. Molecular & general genetics : MGG 1995;248(4):446-58.

Gholson J. Lyon, Patricia Mayville, Tom W. Muir, and Richard P. Novick. Rational design of a global inhibitor of the virulence response in Staphylococcus aureus, based in part on localization of the site of inhibition to the receptor-histidine kinase, AgrC. PNAS. 2000; 97 (24): 13330-35.

Matthew Thoendel and Alexander R. Horswill. Identification of Staphylococcus aureus AgrD Residues Required for Autoinducing Peptide Biosynthesis. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2009. 284, 21828-21838.