Team:Paris Liliane Bettencourt
From 2010.igem.org
m |
Aleksandra (Talk | contribs) |
||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
<div id="right"> | <div id="right"> | ||
- | <OBJECT classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" | + | <!-- <OBJECT classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" |
codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=5,0,0,0" | codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=5,0,0,0" | ||
WIDTH=130 HEIGHT=336> | WIDTH=130 HEIGHT=336> | ||
Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
- | </div> | + | </div> --> |
</html> | </html> |
Revision as of 14:46, 19 October 2010
Abstract
Counting is the action of finding the number of elements in a set. Past attempts at developing counters in cells have mostly attempted to mimic the binary methods that computers use to count.
Our first counter takes a new approach to counting in cells, essentially a mechanical rotary counter implemented on a micro scale. Each time the counter detects an input, it performs an excision and integration directly down-stream of the active site, turning on a reporter and rotating over one "notch" on the counter.
Our second counter operates on the wholly different principle that the statistical occurrence of a rare event in a large population can be modeled. Each cell in our population harbors a construct that when stimulated has a small chance of excising a terminator and expressing a resistance gene. The number of resistant cells is thus an accurate count of the number of input stimuli.