Team:Macquarie Australia/Notebook
From 2010.igem.org
Line 80: | Line 80: | ||
The extractions were run on a GelRed stained 1% agarose gel and photo taken for visualization (see below). </li> <p> <li type="disc"> | The extractions were run on a GelRed stained 1% agarose gel and photo taken for visualization (see below). </li> <p> <li type="disc"> | ||
A NanoDrop spectrophotometer reading was also recorded to check the quality of the extracted genomic DNA. <p> </li> <li type="disc"> | A NanoDrop spectrophotometer reading was also recorded to check the quality of the extracted genomic DNA. <p> </li> <li type="disc"> | ||
- | The extraction was successful for all A. tumefaciens cell lysate samples (labeled DNA1.1, DNA1.2, DNA2 (See figure below) <p> </li> | + | The extraction was successful for all A. tumefaciens cell lysate samples (labeled DNA1.1, DNA1.2, DNA2.1, DNA2.2 (See figure below) <p> </li> |
<p><h3><i><b>A. tumefaciens </i> genomic DNA extraction agarose results: <p> </b> </h3> | <p><h3><i><b>A. tumefaciens </i> genomic DNA extraction agarose results: <p> </b> </h3> | ||
Line 139: | Line 139: | ||
Various primers were designed manually and using Primer 3 Software package for PCR amplification.</li> <p> | Various primers were designed manually and using Primer 3 Software package for PCR amplification.</li> <p> | ||
<li type="disc"> | <li type="disc"> | ||
- | The primers were ordered and supplied through | + | The primers were ordered and supplied through IDT.</li><p> |
<li type="disc"> | <li type="disc"> | ||
There was an array of various primers ordered for amplification of different products. The details of the primers are described below. </li><p> | There was an array of various primers ordered for amplification of different products. The details of the primers are described below. </li><p> | ||
Line 158: | Line 158: | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
- | <td> | + | <td> (AT-FWD-1)</td> |
<td>5’-ATG AGT TCA CAT ACG CCG-3’</td> | <td>5’-ATG AGT TCA CAT ACG CCG-3’</td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
Line 181: | Line 181: | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
- | <td> | + | <td>(AT-BHO-F)</td> |
<td>5’- AAG GAG ATA TAC ATA TGA TGA GTT CAC ATA CGC CG – 3’</td> | <td>5’- AAG GAG ATA TAC ATA TGA TGA GTT CAC ATA CGC CG – 3’</td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
- | <td> | + | <td>(AT-BHO-R)</td> |
<td> 5’- AAG TTG ACA CTC ATA TGA GCC CTC CTT TCA GGC – 3’</td> | <td> 5’- AAG TTG ACA CTC ATA TGA GCC CTC CTT TCA GGC – 3’</td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
Line 208: | Line 208: | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
- | <td> | + | <td>(AT-FWD-1)</td> |
<td>5’-ATG AGT TCA CAT ACG CCG-3’</td> | <td>5’-ATG AGT TCA CAT ACG CCG-3’</td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
- | <td> | + | <td>(AT-RVS-1)</td> |
<td>5’-TCA GGC AAT TTT TTC CTC-3’</td> | <td>5’-TCA GGC AAT TTT TTC CTC-3’</td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
Line 235: | Line 235: | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
- | <td> | + | <td>(AT-AHO-F)</td> |
<td>5’- CCG AAG GCT AGG ATC CAG GAG GGC TGC TAT GAG – 3’</td> | <td>5’- CCG AAG GCT AGG ATC CAG GAG GGC TGC TAT GAG – 3’</td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
- | <td> | + | <td>(AT-AHO-R)</td> |
<td> 5’- GTT AGC CGG ATC CTC AGG CAA TTT TTT CCT – 3’</td> | <td> 5’- GTT AGC CGG ATC CTC AGG CAA TTT TTT CCT – 3’</td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
Line 264: | Line 264: | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
- | <td> | + | <td>(AT-FWD-RBS)</td> |
<td> 5’- AGG AGG GCT ATG AGT TCA CAT ACG CCG -3’</td> | <td> 5’- AGG AGG GCT ATG AGT TCA CAT ACG CCG -3’</td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
Line 288: | Line 288: | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
- | <td> | + | <td>Gibco H2O</td> |
<td> 13.75</td> | <td> 13.75</td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
Line 364: | Line 364: | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<td>DNA1.2</td> | <td>DNA1.2</td> | ||
- | <td> | + | <td> (AT-FWD-1)</td> |
- | <td> | + | <td> (AT-RVS-1)</td> |
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<td> DNA2.2</td> | <td> DNA2.2</td> | ||
- | <td> | + | <td>(AT-FWD-1)</td> |
- | <td> | + | <td> (AT-RVS-1)</td> |
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<td>DNA1.2</td> | <td>DNA1.2</td> | ||
- | <td> | + | <td> (AT-BHO-F)</td> |
- | <td> | + | <td> (AT-RVS-1)</td> |
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<td>DNA2.2 </td> | <td>DNA2.2 </td> | ||
- | <td> | + | <td> (AT-BHO-F)</td> |
- | <td> | + | <td> (AT-RVS-1)</td> |
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<td> DNA1.2</td> | <td> DNA1.2</td> | ||
- | <td> | + | <td>(AT-FWD-RBS) </td> |
- | <td> | + | <td> (AT-RVS-1)</td> |
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<td> DNA2.2</td> | <td> DNA2.2</td> | ||
- | <td> | + | <td>(AT-FWD-RBS)</td> |
- | <td> | + | <td> (AT-RVS-1)</td> |
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<td> SSH20 (negative control)</td> | <td> SSH20 (negative control)</td> | ||
- | <td> | + | <td>(AT-FWD-1)</td> |
- | <td> | + | <td> (AT-RVS-1)</td> |
</tr> | </tr> | ||
Line 413: | Line 413: | ||
<li type="disc"> | <li type="disc"> | ||
- | A band was seen in lane 6. This lane was using the primer and DNA template combinations of DNA2.2, | + | A band was seen in lane 6. This lane was using the primer and DNA template combinations of DNA2.2, (AT-BHO-F) and (AT-RVS-1) primers <p>= SUCCESS!!! </li> |
<li type="disc"> | <li type="disc"> | ||
- | A PCR product is seen in lane 6 – this is the DNA2.2 template amplified with the | + | A PCR product is seen in lane 6 – this is the DNA2.2 template amplified with the (AT-FWD-RBS) and (AT-RVS-1) primers <p>= SUCCESS!! </li> |
Line 425: | Line 425: | ||
<b>Figure 2.</b> GelRed stained 1.2% agarose gel of initial PCR of <i>A. tumefaciens </i> using various primers. <p> | <b>Figure 2.</b> GelRed stained 1.2% agarose gel of initial PCR of <i>A. tumefaciens </i> using various primers. <p> | ||
- | In lanes 1 and 11 there is a 1kb ladder. In lane 2 is the DNA1.2 template with | + | In lanes 1 and 11 there is a 1kb ladder. In lane 2 is the DNA1.2 template with (AT-FWD-1) and R1 primer pair. <p>In lane 3 is the DNA2.2 template with (AT-FWD-1) and R1 primer pair. In lane 4 is the DNA1.2 template with F2 and R1 primer pair. In lane 5 is the DNA2.2 template with the F2 and R1 primer pair. In lanes 6 and 7 there is nothing loaded as the wells were damaged. In lane 8 there is the DNA1.2 template with F3 and R1 primer pair. In lane 9 there is the DNA2.2 template with the F3 and R1 primer pair and in lane 10 there is the ssH2O negative control. A product is seen in lane 9 – this is the DNA2.2 template with the F3 and R1 primers! <u>This means that we have a <i> A. tumefaciens bacteriophytochrome </i> product with a ribosome binding sight inserted. </u> <p> |
</u> | </u> | ||
Line 520: | Line 520: | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<td> DNA2.2</td> | <td> DNA2.2</td> | ||
- | <td> | + | <td> (AT-FWD-1)</td> |
- | <td> | + | <td> (AT-RVS-1)</td> |
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<td> PCR product (from DNA2.2)</td> | <td> PCR product (from DNA2.2)</td> | ||
- | <td> | + | <td>(AT-FWD-1)</td> |
- | <td> | + | <td> (AT-RVS-1)</td> |
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<td> DNA2.2</td> | <td> DNA2.2</td> | ||
- | <td> | + | <td> (AT-BHO-F)</td> |
- | <td> | + | <td> (AT-RVS-1)</td> |
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<td> PCR product (from DNA2.2)</td> | <td> PCR product (from DNA2.2)</td> | ||
- | <td> | + | <td> (AT-BHO-F)</td> |
- | <td> | + | <td> (AT-RVS-1)</td> |
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<td> DNA2.2</td> | <td> DNA2.2</td> | ||
- | <td> | + | <td>(AT-FWD-RBS) </td> |
- | <td> | + | <td> (AT-RVS-1)</td> |
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<td> PCR product (from DNA2.2)</td> | <td> PCR product (from DNA2.2)</td> | ||
- | <td> | + | <td>(AT-FWD-RBS)</td> |
- | <td> | + | <td> (AT-RVS-1)</td> |
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<td> DNA2.2</td> | <td> DNA2.2</td> | ||
- | <td> | + | <td>(AT-FWD-1)</td> |
- | <td> | + | <td> (AT-AHO-R)</td> |
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<td> PCR product (from DNA2.2)</td> | <td> PCR product (from DNA2.2)</td> | ||
- | <td> | + | <td>(AT-FWD-1)</td> |
- | <td> | + | <td> (AT-AHO-R)</td> |
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<td> DNA2.2</td> | <td> DNA2.2</td> | ||
- | <td> | + | <td> (AT-BHO-F)</td> |
- | <td> | + | <td> (AT-AHO-R)</td> |
</tr> | </tr> | ||
Line 575: | Line 575: | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<td> PCR product (from DNA2.2)</td> | <td> PCR product (from DNA2.2)</td> | ||
- | <td> | + | <td> (AT-BHO-F)</td> |
- | <td> | + | <td> (AT-AHO-R)</td> |
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<td> DNA2.2</td> | <td> DNA2.2</td> | ||
- | <td> | + | <td> (AT-FWD-RBS)</td> |
- | <td> | + | <td> (AT-AHO-R)</td> |
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<td> PCR product (from DNA2.2)</td> | <td> PCR product (from DNA2.2)</td> | ||
- | <td> | + | <td> (AT-FWD-RBS)</td> |
- | <td> | + | <td> (AT-AHO-R)</td> |
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<td> ssH2O (-) control </td> | <td> ssH2O (-) control </td> | ||
- | <td> | + | <td> (AT-FWD-1)</td> |
- | <td> | + | <td> (AT-RVS-1)</td> |
</tr> | </tr> | ||
Line 609: | Line 609: | ||
- | <b>Figure 3. </b> GelRed stained 2% agarose gel of optimized PCR of <i> A. tumefaciens bacteriophytochrome </i> using various primers. In lanes 1 and 15 there is a 100bp ladder. In lane 2 is the DNA2.2 sample with | + | <b>Figure 3. </b> GelRed stained 2% agarose gel of optimized PCR of <i> A. tumefaciens bacteriophytochrome </i> using various primers. In lanes 1 and 15 there is a 100bp ladder. In lane 2 is the DNA2.2 sample with (AT-FWD-1) and R1 primer pair. In lane 3 there is PCR product template (from DNA2.2 sample) with (AT-FWD-1)and R1 primer pair. In lane 4 there is DNA sample with F2 and R1 primer pair. In lane 5 is the PCR product (from DNA2.2 sample) with F2 and R1 primer pair. In lane 6 there is DNA2.2 sample with F3 and R1 primer pair. In lane 7 there is PCR product template (from DNA2.2 sample) with F3 and R1 primer pair. In lane 8 there is DNA2.2 sample with (AT-FWD-1) and R2 primer pairs. In lane 9 there is PCR product template (from DNA2.2 sample) with (AT-FWD-1) and R2 primer pairs. In lane 10 there is DNA2.2 sample with F2 and R2 primer pairs. In lane 11 there is PCR product (from DNA2.2 sample) with F2 and R2 primer pair. In lane 12 there is DNA2.2 sample with F2 and R2 primer pair. In lane 13 there is PCR product (from DNA2.2 sample) with F3 and R2 primer pair. In lane 14 there is ssH2O negative control with (AT-FWD-1)and R1 primer pair. <u> All the lanes worked. There is a weird result in lane 7 which is probably due to non-specific binding. = SUCCESS! <p> |
</u> | </u> | ||
Revision as of 07:18, 15 October 2010
PROJECT LAB BOOK
Welcome to the Macquarie University project lab book page!
Here you will find a day-by-day account of our triumphs and failures.
A day-by-day progress for Agrobacterium Tumefaciens Bacteriophytochrome
20th August 2010
Genomic DNA extraction
- The first primer pair is F2 (AT-BHO-F) with R3 (AT-BHO-R) [this will insert the bacteriophytchrome gene BEFORE the heme oxygenase gene in the operon]
- The second primer pair is F4 (AT-AHO-F) with R2 (AT-AHO-R) [this will insert the bacteriophytochrome gene AFTER the heme oxygenase gene in the operon]
Mastermix: | Amount per sample (ul) |
---|---|
Clean H2O | 13.75 |
10x Buffer | 2.00 |
Polymerase enzyme | 0.25 |
dNTP | 1.00 |
Fwd primer | 1.00 |
Rvs primer | 1.00 |
Genomic DNA | 1.00 |
Total | 20.00 |
The PCR program was set up as per the following:
- 94˚C for 2 minutes
- 94˚C for 30 seconds
- 60˚C for 30 seconds
- 72˚C for 2 minutes & 30 seconds
- 72˚C for 10 minutes
- 4˚C to end.
(This was repeated for another 25 cycles)
Experimental Design – Primer combinations and annealing temperatures:
Fwd Primer | Rvs primer | Temp 1 (Degrees Celsius) | Temp 2 (Degrees Celsius) | Temp 3 (Degrees Celsius) | Temp 4 (Degrees Celsius) | Temp 5 (Degrees Celsius) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
F2 (AT-BHO-F) | R3 (AT-BHO-R) | 57.1 | 58.7 | 60.6 | 63.4 | 64.8 |
F4 (AT-AHO-F) | R2 (AT-AHO-R) | 57.1 | 58.7 | 60.6 | 63.4 | 64.8 |
FIGURE FOUR ***** PCR Optimisation (gradient PCR) results ***
Figure 4. No product amplification is seen in any lanes. The anticipated product is approximately 1.6 to 3.0kb. The gel had been over run and at the very bottom some bands can be seen but as these are so small they are possibly dimers that are less than 300bp.
Unfortunately, no products were seen. The anticipated product size was between 1.6kb and 3kb. The gel was over run but the only products that were over run were probably primer dimers, which are less than 300bp in size. = FAIL!
7th September 2010
PCR Optimization (using Gradient PCR)
Mastermix: | Amount per sample (ul) |
---|---|
Clean H2O | 13.75 |
10x Buffer | 2.00 |
Polymerase enzyme | 0.25 |
dNTP | 1.00 |
Fwd primer | 1.00 |
Rvs primer | 1.00 |
Genomic DNA | 1.00 |
Total | 20.00 |
The PCR program was set up as per the following:
- 94˚C for 2 minutes
- 94˚C for 30 seconds
- 60˚C for 30 seconds
- 72˚C for 2 minutes & 30 seconds
- 72˚C for 10 minutes
- 4˚C to end.
(This was repeated for another 25 cycles)
Experimental Design – Primer combinations and annealing temperatures:
DNA template | Dilution | Fwd primer | Rvs primer | Annealing temp (Degrees Celsius) |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCR product (from DNA2.2) | 1:100 | F2 (AT-BHO-F) | R3 (AT-BHO-R) | 60 |
PCR product (from DNA2.2) | 1:200 | F2 (AT-BHO-F) | R3 (AT-BHO-R) | 60 |
PCR product (from DNA2.2) | 1:100 | F4 (AT-AHO-F) | R2 (AT-AHO-R) | 60 |
PCR product (from DNA2.2) | 1:200 | F4 (AT-AHO-F) | R2 (AT-AHO-R) | 60 |
PCR product (from DNA2.2) | 1:100 | F2 (AT-BHO-F) | R3 (AT-BHO-R) | 65 |
PCR product (from DNA2.2) | 1:200 | F2 (AT-BHO-F) | R3 (AT-BHO-R) | 65 |
PCR product (from DNA2.2) | 1:100 | F4 (AT-AHO-F) | R2 (AT-AHO-R) | 65 |
PCR product (from DNA2.2) | 1:200 | F4 (AT-AHO-F) | R2 (AT-AHO-R) | 65 |
10th September 2010
PCR Optimization (repeated)
Mastermix: | Amount per sample (ul) |
---|---|
Clean H2O | 13.75 |
10x Buffer | 2.00 |
Polymerase enzyme | 0.25 |
dNTP | 1.00 |
Fwd primer | 1.00 |
Rvs primer | 1.00 |
Genomic DNA | 1.00 |
Total | 20.00 |
The first PCR program was set up as per the following:
- 94˚C for 2 minutes
- 94˚C for 30 seconds
- 60˚C for 30 seconds
- 72˚C for 2 minutes & 30 seconds
- 72˚C for 10 minutes
- 4˚C to end.
(This was repeated for another 35 cycles)
The second PCR program was set up as per the following:
- 94˚C for 2 minutes
- 94˚C for 30 seconds
- 40˚C for 30 seconds
- 72˚C for 2 minutes & 30 seconds
- 72˚C for 10 minutes
- 4˚C to end.
- 4˚C for 5 minutes
- 94˚C for 30 seconds
- 40˚C for 30 seconds
- 72˚C for 2 minutes and 30 seconds
- 72˚C for 10 minutes
- 4 ˚C to end
(This was repeated for another 4 cycles)
(This was repeated for another 31 cycles)
Experimental Design – Primer combinations and annealing temperatures:
Template | Primer pair | Annealing temp (degrees Celsius) | Number of cycles |
---|---|---|---|
F3-R1 PCR product | F2-R3 | 40 | 4 |
F3-R2 PCR product | F4-R2 | 60 | 35 |
F3-R1 PCR product (1:10 dilution) | F2-R3 | 40 | 4 |
F3-R2 PCR product (1:10 dilution) | F4-R2 | 60 | 35 |
FIGURE FIVE ***** PCR optimization (with ssPCR amplification for F2 primer) ***
Figure 5. GelRed stained 2% agarose gel of optimized PCR using primer pairs for insertion of the heme oxygenase gene and bacteriophytochrome gene. In lanes 1 and 6 there is a 1kb ladder. In lane 2 there is the F3-R1 PCR product amplified with F2-R3 primer pair on the special PCR program allowing for the R3 primer to bind first. In lane 3 there is the F3-R2 PCR product amplified with F4-R2 primer pair on the normal PCR program. In lane 4 there is the F3-R1 PCR product diluted 1:10 amplified with F2-R3 primer pair on the special PCR program allowing for the R3 primer to bind first. In lane 5 there is the F3-R2 PCR product diluted 1:10 amplified with F4-R2 primer pair on the normal PCR program. There is a product band seen in lane 3 – SUCCESS! This is the product with the bacteriophytochrome gene inserted AFTER the heme oxygenase gene.