Team:Tokyo Tech/safety

From 2010.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
(→Q&A)
 
(3 intermediate revisions not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
-
{{Tokyo_Tech_Template}}
+
{{Tokyo_Tech_Template2}}
<div id="super_main_wrapper">
<div id="super_main_wrapper">
Line 7: Line 7:
Specifically, teams should consider the following four questions:
Specifically, teams should consider the following four questions:
-
Would any of your project ideas raise safety issues in terms of: researcher safety, public safety, or environmental safety?
+
Q1. Would any of your project ideas raise safety issues in terms of researcher safety, public safety or environmental safety ?
 +
A1. For review of our applications by a local biosafety group, researcher safety, public safety and environmental safety are evaluated.<br>
 +
In this meaning, our answer is all YES.
-
Q、 Is there a local biosafety group, committee, or review board at your institution?
+
Q2. Do any of the new BioBrick parts (or devices) that you made this year raise any safety issues? If yes,
 +
 +
A2.No. Our parts are of safety level one and two. We used genes which are analyzed in peer-reviewed papers.
-
A、 Biosafety committee of our organization accepted our aplications.
+
Q3. Is there a local biosafety group, committee, or review board at your institution?
 +
 +
A3. Yes
 +
:If yes, what does your local biosafety group think about your project?
-
Q、 What does your local biosafety group think about your project?
+
:The biosafety committee of our organization accepted our applications. They think our project is legal.
-
A、 They think our project is leagal.
+
Q4. Do you have any other ideas how to deal with safety issues that could be useful for future iGEM competitions? How could parts, devices and systems be made even safer through biosafety engineering
-
 
+
A4.Put document number of a review sheet from the local biosafety group.
-
Q、 Do any of the new BioBrick parts that you made this year raise any safety issues?
+
-
 
+
-
A、 No. Our parts are safty level one. We used genes which are analysed in peer-reviewed papers.
+
-
 
+
-
 
+
-
Q、 If yes, did you document these issues in the Registry?
+
-
 
+
-
A、 Just in case, we refereed papers for our new biobrick parts.  
+

Latest revision as of 17:20, 27 October 2010

iGEM Tokyo Tech 2010 "E.coli with Humanity"

Q&A

For iGEM 2010 teams are asked to detail how they approached any issues of biological safety associated with their projects. Specifically, teams should consider the following four questions:

Q1. Would any of your project ideas raise safety issues in terms of researcher safety, public safety or environmental safety ?

A1. For review of our applications by a local biosafety group, researcher safety, public safety and environmental safety are evaluated.
In this meaning, our answer is all YES.

Q2. Do any of the new BioBrick parts (or devices) that you made this year raise any safety issues? If yes,

A2.No. Our parts are of safety level one and two. We used genes which are analyzed in peer-reviewed papers.

Q3. Is there a local biosafety group, committee, or review board at your institution?

A3. Yes

If yes, what does your local biosafety group think about your project?
The biosafety committee of our organization accepted our applications. They think our project is legal.

Q4. Do you have any other ideas how to deal with safety issues that could be useful for future iGEM competitions? How could parts, devices and systems be made even safer through biosafety engineering

A4.Put document number of a review sheet from the local biosafety group.


</body></html>

Retrieved from "http://2010.igem.org/Team:Tokyo_Tech/safety"