Team:Peking/Notebook/MChen
From 2010.igem.org
(→August) |
|||
(6 intermediate revisions not shown) | |||
Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
* <span style="font-size:4mm;">[[Team:Peking/Notebook/MChen#August| August, 2010]]</span> | * <span style="font-size:4mm;">[[Team:Peking/Notebook/MChen#August| August, 2010]]</span> | ||
- | * <span style="font-size:4mm;">[[Team:Peking/Notebook/MChen#September| September | + | * <span style="font-size:4mm;">[[Team:Peking/Notebook/MChen#September & October| September & October, 2010]]</span> |
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
==July== | ==July== | ||
Line 90: | Line 86: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|} | |} | ||
- | [ | + | [<html><a href="#top">TOP</a></html>] |
===7.1-7.7=== | ===7.1-7.7=== | ||
Line 153: | Line 149: | ||
ViolaD_Rev aaactgcagcggccgctactagtaTCAGCGCTGCAAAGCATAAC | ViolaD_Rev aaactgcagcggccgctactagtaTCAGCGCTGCAAAGCATAAC | ||
- | + | ViolaE_For ccg gaattc gcggccgct tctagATGGAGAACCGTGAGCCAC | |
Line 177: | Line 173: | ||
I did the PCR three times, VioB, VioC and VioE hadn’t result. VioA and VioD were extracted from the gel. | I did the PCR three times, VioB, VioC and VioE hadn’t result. VioA and VioD were extracted from the gel. | ||
- | |||
- | |||
===7.8-7.14=== | ===7.8-7.14=== | ||
Line 310: | Line 304: | ||
9 63.0℃ | 9 63.0℃ | ||
- | + | Electrophoresis in 1.5% agarose gel to test the results of PCR VioB, five gradients had results. All were extracted from the gel and sequence, gradient 6 and gradient 7 had no mutation. | |
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
===7.15-7.22=== | ===7.15-7.22=== | ||
Line 433: | Line 425: | ||
==August== | ==August== | ||
+ | {| class="calendar" border="0" rules="rows" width="650px" style="color:#ffffff" | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |style="text-align:center"| Mon | ||
+ | |style="text-align:center"| Tue | ||
+ | |style="text-align:center"| Wed | ||
+ | |style="text-align:center"| Thu | ||
+ | |style="text-align:center"| Fri | ||
+ | |style="text-align:center"| Sat | ||
+ | |style="text-align:center"| Sun | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |style="text-align:center"| [[Team:Peking/Notebook/MChen#7.23-8.17|1]] | ||
+ | |style="text-align:center"| [[Team:Peking/Notebook/MChen#7.23-8.17|2]] | ||
+ | |style="text-align:center"| [[Team:Peking/Notebook/MChen#7.23-8.17|3]] | ||
+ | |style="text-align:center"| [[Team:Peking/Notebook/MChen#7.23-8.17|4]] | ||
+ | |style="text-align:center"| [[Team:Peking/Notebook/MChen#7.23-8.17|5]] | ||
+ | |style="text-align:center"| [[Team:Peking/Notebook/MChen#7.23-8.17|6]] | ||
+ | |style="text-align:center"| [[Team:Peking/Notebook/MChen#7.23-8.17|7]] | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |style="text-align:center"| [[Team:Peking/Notebook/MChen#7.23-8.17|8]] | ||
+ | |style="text-align:center"|[[Team:Peking/Notebook/MChen#7.23-8.17|9]] | ||
+ | |style="text-align:center"| [[Team:Peking/Notebook/MChen#7.23-8.17|10]] | ||
+ | |style="text-align:center"| [[Team:Peking/Notebook/MChen#7.23-8.17|11]] | ||
+ | |style="text-align:center"| [[Team:Peking/Notebook/MChen#7.23-8.17|12]] | ||
+ | |style="text-align:center"| [[Team:Peking/Notebook/MChen#7.23-8.17|13]] | ||
+ | |style="text-align:center"| [[Team:Peking/Notebook/MChen#7.23-8.17|14]] | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |style="text-align:center"| [[Team:Peking/Notebook/MChen#7.23-8.17|15]] | ||
+ | |style="text-align:center"| [[Team:Peking/Notebook/MChen#7.23-8.17|16]] | ||
+ | |style="text-align:center"| [[Team:Peking/Notebook/MChen#7.23-8.17|17]] | ||
+ | |style="text-align:center"| [[Team:Peking/Notebook/MChen#8.18-8.25|18]] | ||
+ | |style="text-align:center"| [[Team:Peking/Notebook/MChen#8.18-8.25|19]] | ||
+ | |style="text-align:center"| [[Team:Peking/Notebook/MChen#8.18-8.25|20]] | ||
+ | |style="text-align:center"| [[Team:Peking/Notebook/MChen#8.18-8.25|21]] | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |style="text-align:center"| [[Team:Peking/Notebook/MChen#8.18-8.25|22]] | ||
+ | |style="text-align:center"| [[Team:Peking/Notebook/MChen#8.18-8.25|23]] | ||
+ | |style="text-align:center"| [[Team:Peking/Notebook/MChen#8.18-8.25|24]] | ||
+ | |style="text-align:center"| [[Team:Peking/Notebook/MChen#8.18-8.25|25]] | ||
+ | |style="text-align:center"| [[Team:Peking/Notebook/MChen#8.26-9.10|26]] | ||
+ | |style="text-align:center"| [[Team:Peking/Notebook/MChen#8.26-9.10|27]] | ||
+ | |style="text-align:center"| [[Team:Peking/Notebook/MChen#8.26-9.10|28]] | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |style="text-align:center"| [[Team:Peking/Notebook/MChen#8.26-9.10|29]] | ||
+ | |style="text-align:center"| [[Team:Peking/Notebook/MChen#8.26-9.10|30]] | ||
+ | |style="text-align:center"| [[Team:Peking/Notebook/MChen#8.26-9.10|31]] | ||
+ | |style="text-align:center"| - | ||
+ | |style="text-align:center"| - | ||
+ | |style="text-align:center"| - | ||
+ | |style="text-align:center"| - | ||
+ | |} | ||
+ | [<html><a href="#top">TOP</a></html>] | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===8.18-8.25=== | ||
+ | |||
+ | After the characterization of CrtEBI(K274100) and CrtEBIY(K274200), we chose CrtEBI as our reporter. So I began to ligate the reporter to the promoter. | ||
+ | |||
+ | 1. Double digest for CrtEBI and PmerT(on pSB1C3, submitted by Yiwei Chen) | ||
+ | |||
+ | NEB: | ||
+ | |||
+ | CrtEBI 10μl | ||
+ | |||
+ | 10×3 buffer 2μl | ||
+ | |||
+ | XbaI 1μl | ||
+ | |||
+ | PstI 1μl | ||
+ | |||
+ | ddH2O 6μl | ||
+ | |||
+ | Total 20μl | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | PmerT 10μl | ||
+ | |||
+ | 10×2 buffer 2μl | ||
+ | |||
+ | SpeI 1μl | ||
+ | |||
+ | PstI 1μl | ||
+ | |||
+ | ddH2O 6μl | ||
+ | |||
+ | Total 20μl | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | 37℃ overnight | ||
+ | |||
+ | 2. Ligate | ||
+ | |||
+ | XP CrtEBI(insert) 2μl 1μl 4μl | ||
+ | |||
+ | SP PmerT (vector) 6μl 7μl 4μl | ||
+ | |||
+ | 10×T4 buffer 1μl | ||
+ | |||
+ | T4 DNA Ligase 1μl | ||
+ | |||
+ | Total 10μl | ||
+ | |||
+ | 16℃ overnight(NEB) | ||
+ | |||
+ | Or | ||
+ | |||
+ | 25℃ 2 hours(Trans) | ||
+ | |||
+ | 3. Transform and pick five single colonies and inoculate (in 5ml antibiotics culture), miniprep, digest and sequence. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | This process was repeated many times in different ligation conditions, but all failed. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ===8.26-9.10=== | ||
+ | |||
+ | I used another strategy. Two strands of the promoter PmerT and PpbrA which were synthesized by Hua Da company was used. The two strands included EcoRI and SpeI site. The promoters were inserted to the vector which has CrtEBI. | ||
+ | |||
+ | 1. Anneal | ||
+ | |||
+ | Mer_pro_for 1.5μl | ||
+ | |||
+ | Mer_pro_rev 1.5μl | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | PpbrA_for 1.5μl | ||
+ | |||
+ | PpbrA_rev 1.5μl | ||
+ | |||
+ | Metalbath 95℃ 5min | ||
+ | |||
+ | Cool to room temperature(on metalbath) | ||
+ | |||
+ | 2. Phosphorylation | ||
+ | |||
+ | Insert 3μl | ||
+ | |||
+ | T4-Ligase buffer(NEB) 1μl | ||
+ | |||
+ | T4 polykinase(NEB) 1μl | ||
+ | |||
+ | ddH2O 4μl | ||
+ | |||
+ | total 9μl | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | 37℃ 30min | ||
+ | |||
+ | 3. Ligation | ||
+ | |||
+ | Insert(after phosphorylation) 9μl | ||
+ | |||
+ | T4-ligase 1μl | ||
+ | |||
+ | Vector 1μl | ||
+ | |||
+ | Total 11μl | ||
+ | |||
+ | 16℃ 1hour | ||
+ | |||
+ | Or | ||
+ | |||
+ | 16℃ overnight | ||
+ | |||
+ | 4. Transform, pick colonies, miniprep, digest and sequence. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | After repeated several times, I succeed in PpbrA-CrtEBI at last. Then I ligated the CrtEBI to PmerT in pSB1C3 again and succeed. But the worst was still to come. The E.coli which has PpbrA-CrtEBI or PmerT- CrtEBI appeared bright red, just as the constitutive promoter-CrtEBI. So we had to give up CrtEBI as our repoter. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==September & October== | ||
+ | [[Team:Peking/Notebook/MChen#8.26-9.10|9.1-9.10]] | ||
+ | ===9.10-10.10=== | ||
+ | |||
+ | The summer vocation has come to a close. I retarded the progress. All the protocols followed protocols above. | ||
+ | |||
+ | 1. Three colones | ||
+ | |||
+ | Pmert-pag | ||
+ | |||
+ | PmerT-ogr | ||
+ | |||
+ | PmerT-phiR73delta | ||
+ | |||
+ | Everything went off without a hitch. | ||
+ | |||
+ | 2. Change backbones | ||
+ | |||
+ | constitutive promoter(BBa_J23103)-CrtEBI | ||
+ | |||
+ | terminator (B0015) )-CrtEBI | ||
+ | |||
+ | constitutive promoter(BBa_J23103)-CrtEBIY | ||
+ | |||
+ | The double digestion (EcoRI and PstI) for constitutive promoter(BBa_J23103)-CrtEBIY failed twice. The double digestion (EcoRI and PstI) result was the same as the EcoRI digestion or PstI digestion. The terminator (B0015) )-CrtEBI transformed twice after changing the backbone, but the results of sequence were all wrong. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
<html> | <html> |
Latest revision as of 10:08, 27 October 2010
Contents
July
Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat | Sun |
- | - | - | - | 1 | 2 | 3 |
4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 |
18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 |
25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |
[TOP]
7.1-7.7
I wanted to get CrtE, CrtB, CrtI, CrtY, CrtZ, VioA, VioB, VioC, VioD and VioE for producing CrtEBI, CrtEBIY, CrtEBIYZ, VioABCE, VioABDE and VioABCDE.
1. Extract DNA from the registry 2. Add 10μl ddH2O, leave the water in the well for 30 sec(red).
BBa_K118014 rbs+crtE 2-18H/2010 pSB1A2
BBa_K118013 rbs+crtY 2-18F/2010 pSB1A2
BBa_K118006 rbs+crtB 2-16N/2010 pSB1A2
BBa_K118005 rbs+crtI 2-16L/2010 pSB1A2
BBa_K274003 VioABDE 3-20H/2010 pSB1K3
BBa_K274004 VioABCE 3-20J/2010 pSB1K3
2. Pipette 2μl of the resuspended DNA transform into the Trans 5a competent cells.
Each tube: Competent cells 50μl + DNA 2μl
3. Picking a single colony and inoculate for 15 hours(in 5ml antibiotics culture)
4. Miniprep and use spectrophotometer to estimate the concentration of DNA(50×dilution)
VioABDE A260=0.027 conc=1.3401μg/ml
VioABCE A260=0.022 conc=1.0782μg/ml
CrtY A260=0.047 conc=2.3349μg/ml
CrtI A260=0.078 conc=3.8963μg/ml
CrtZ A260=0.044 conc=2.2146μg/ml
CrtE A260=0.087 conc=4.3482μg/ml
CrtB A260=0.055 conc=2.7299μg/ml
5. PCR for VioA, VioB, VioC, VioD, VioE
The primer for VioA, VioB, VioC, VioD and VioE are:
ViolaA_For ccggaattcgcggccgcttctagATGAAACATTCTTCCGATATCTGCATTGTTGG
ViolaA_Rev aaactgcagcggccgctactagtaTCACGCGGCGATACGCTGCA
ViolaB_For ccggaattcgcggccgcttctagATGAGCATTCTGGATTTCCCGCGTATC
ViolaB_Rev aaactgcagcggccgctactagtaTTAGGCCTCGCGGCTCAGTTTG
ViolaC_For ccggaattcgcggccgcttctagATGAAACGTGCGATTATCGTTGG
ViolaC_Rev aaactgcagcggccgctactagtaTCAATTCACGCGACCAATCTTG
ViolaD_For ccggaattcgcggccgcttctagATGAAGATTCTGGTCATTGGTG
ViolaD_Rev aaactgcagcggccgctactagtaTCAGCGCTGCAAAGCATAAC
ViolaE_For ccg gaattc gcggccgct tctagATGGAGAACCGTGAGCCAC
ViolaE_Rev aaa ctgcag cggccgct actagtaTTAGCGCTTGGCCGCGAAA
dd H2O 11.7μl
5×phusion HF buffer 4μl
2.5MdNTP 1.6μl
For 1μl
Rev 1μl
Template 0.5μl
(chill on ice)
Phusion pol 0.2μl
I did the PCR three times, VioB, VioC and VioE hadn’t result. VioA and VioD were extracted from the gel.
7.8-7.14
1. Double digest for CrtE、CrtB、CrtI、CrtY、CrtZ
CrtB、CrtY、CrtZ: EcoRI and XbaI
CrtE、CrtI: EcoRI and SpeI
NEB:
CrtE or CrtI 10μl
10×EcoRI buffer 2μl
EcoRI 1μl
SpeI 1μl
ddH2O 6μl
Total 20μl
Takara:
CrtB or CrtY or CrtZ 10μl
EcoRI 1μl
XbaI 1μl
ddH2O 6μl
Total 20μl
After double digestion, electrophoresis in 1.5% agarose gel to test the results and the result of CrtI was wrong. I did the double digestion for CrtI again and the result was wrong again.
2. Ligate CrtE and CrtB
CrtB 2μl
CrtE 6μl
10×T4 buffer 1μl
T4 DNA Ligase 1μl
3. Transform CrtEB, pick five single colonies and inoculate(in 5ml antibiotics culture), miniprep by Trans kit, identified by XbaI and PstI digestion.
4. NEB:
CrtEB 5μl
10×3 buffer 2μl
XbaI 1μl
PstI 1μl
ddH2O 11μl
Total 20μl
5. Sequence by Hua Da company. Two results were right
6. Transform BBa_K118005 rbs+crtI and double digestion again, but the result was still wrong. The idea for producing CrtEBI, CrtEBIY and CrtEBIYZ by myself was given up because of the time limition.
7. Gradient PCR for VioB and VioE
Easymix 10μl
ddH2O 8.5μl
Primer For 0.5μl
Primer Rev 0.5μl
Template 0.5μl
Total 20μl
Gradient:
5 50.4℃
6 53.0℃
7 55.8℃
8 58.5℃
9 61.0℃
Electrophoresis in 1.5% agarose gel to test the results of PCR, VioE had results.
6. PCR for VioB by taq polymerase
TransEasymix 10μl
ddH2O 8.5μl
Primer For 0.5μl
Primer Rev 0.5μl
Template 0.5μl(VioABDE)
Total 20μl
Gradient:
5 52.5℃
6 55.1℃
7 57.8℃
8 60.5℃
9 63.0℃
Electrophoresis in 1.5% agarose gel to test the results of PCR VioB, five gradients had results. All were extracted from the gel and sequence, gradient 6 and gradient 7 had no mutation.
7.15-7.22
1. Transform VioABCDE, double digestion VioABCDE for VioC(BamHI, BglII)
Takara:
VioABCDE 10μl
BamHI 1.5μl
BglII 1.5μl
10×K buffer 2μl
ddH2O 5μl
total 20μl
Control
VioABCDE 10μl
BamHI 2μl
10×K buffer 2μl
ddH2O 6μl
total 20μl
37℃ 4 hours
Or
37℃ overnight
Electrophoresis in 1.5% agarose gel, the result of BamHI digestion was the same as double digestion.
2. Gradient PCR for VioC
Easymix 10μl
ddH2O 8.5μl
Primer For 0.5μl
Primer Rev 0.5μl
Template 0.5μl(VioABCDE)
Total 20μl
Gradient
5 46.4℃
6 49℃
7 51.8℃
8 54.5℃
9 57℃
Electrophoresis in 1.5% agarose gel, no result.
I did the transformation, double digestion and PCR twice but the result was the same. The idea for producing VioABCE, VioABDE and VioABCDE by myself was given up because of the time limition.
7.23-8.17
I began to do the characterization for CrtEBI(K274100) and CrtEBIY(K274200).
CrtEBI(K274100) and CrtEBIY(K274200) were ligated to constitutive promoter (BBa_J23103) and terminator (B0015). All the protocols followed protocols above. Unfortunately, I failed in ligating the CrtEBIY and terminator (B0015) though I did this experiment many times in different conditions. The conditions included
1. ligase with different companies(NEB and Trans)
2. different ligation time(1, 2, 4, 12 hours)
3. different reaction systems
(1)
XP CrtEBIY(insert) 2μl 1μl 4μl
SP terminator(vector) 6μl 7μl 4μl
10×T4 buffer 1μl
T4 DNA Ligase 1μl
Total 10μl
(2)
XP CrtEBIY(insert) 4μl 2μl 8μl
SP terminator(vector) 12μl 14μl 8μl
10×T4 buffer 2μl
T4 DNA Ligase 2μl
Total 20μl
4. different temperatures(16℃ and 25℃).
The results were on our wiki, so I didn’t repeat here.
August
Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat | Sun |
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 |
15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 |
22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 |
29 | 30 | 31 | - | - | - | - |
[TOP]
8.18-8.25
After the characterization of CrtEBI(K274100) and CrtEBIY(K274200), we chose CrtEBI as our reporter. So I began to ligate the reporter to the promoter.
1. Double digest for CrtEBI and PmerT(on pSB1C3, submitted by Yiwei Chen)
NEB:
CrtEBI 10μl
10×3 buffer 2μl
XbaI 1μl
PstI 1μl
ddH2O 6μl
Total 20μl
PmerT 10μl
10×2 buffer 2μl
SpeI 1μl
PstI 1μl
ddH2O 6μl
Total 20μl
37℃ overnight
2. Ligate
XP CrtEBI(insert) 2μl 1μl 4μl
SP PmerT (vector) 6μl 7μl 4μl
10×T4 buffer 1μl
T4 DNA Ligase 1μl
Total 10μl
16℃ overnight(NEB)
Or
25℃ 2 hours(Trans)
3. Transform and pick five single colonies and inoculate (in 5ml antibiotics culture), miniprep, digest and sequence.
This process was repeated many times in different ligation conditions, but all failed.
8.26-9.10
I used another strategy. Two strands of the promoter PmerT and PpbrA which were synthesized by Hua Da company was used. The two strands included EcoRI and SpeI site. The promoters were inserted to the vector which has CrtEBI.
1. Anneal
Mer_pro_for 1.5μl
Mer_pro_rev 1.5μl
PpbrA_for 1.5μl
PpbrA_rev 1.5μl
Metalbath 95℃ 5min
Cool to room temperature(on metalbath)
2. Phosphorylation
Insert 3μl
T4-Ligase buffer(NEB) 1μl
T4 polykinase(NEB) 1μl
ddH2O 4μl
total 9μl
37℃ 30min
3. Ligation
Insert(after phosphorylation) 9μl
T4-ligase 1μl
Vector 1μl
Total 11μl
16℃ 1hour
Or
16℃ overnight
4. Transform, pick colonies, miniprep, digest and sequence.
After repeated several times, I succeed in PpbrA-CrtEBI at last. Then I ligated the CrtEBI to PmerT in pSB1C3 again and succeed. But the worst was still to come. The E.coli which has PpbrA-CrtEBI or PmerT- CrtEBI appeared bright red, just as the constitutive promoter-CrtEBI. So we had to give up CrtEBI as our repoter.
September & October
9.10-10.10
The summer vocation has come to a close. I retarded the progress. All the protocols followed protocols above.
1. Three colones
Pmert-pag
PmerT-ogr
PmerT-phiR73delta
Everything went off without a hitch.
2. Change backbones
constitutive promoter(BBa_J23103)-CrtEBI
terminator (B0015) )-CrtEBI
constitutive promoter(BBa_J23103)-CrtEBIY
The double digestion (EcoRI and PstI) for constitutive promoter(BBa_J23103)-CrtEBIY failed twice. The double digestion (EcoRI and PstI) result was the same as the EcoRI digestion or PstI digestion. The terminator (B0015) )-CrtEBI transformed twice after changing the backbone, but the results of sequence were all wrong.