|
|
(16 intermediate revisions not shown) |
Line 20: |
Line 20: |
| border-right: solid 1px #fff; | | border-right: solid 1px #fff; |
| } | | } |
- | a:link, a:visited { color: #fff; } | + | #navigation a:link { color: #fff; } |
- | a:hover, a:active { color: #000; } | + | #navigation a:visited { color: #fff; } |
- | a:hover { background-color: #fff; } | + | #navigation a:hover { color: #fff; } |
| + | #navigation a:active { color: #000; } |
| + | #navigation a:hover { background-color: #fff;color:#77787C; } |
| #navigation{align:left;} | | #navigation{align:left;} |
| #body{float:right;width:81%;padding-bottom:60px;text-align:justify;font-family:calibri,Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:12;} | | #body{float:right;width:81%;padding-bottom:60px;text-align:justify;font-family:calibri,Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:12;} |
Line 48: |
Line 50: |
| <li><a href="https://2010.igem.org/Team:Macquarie_Australia">Home</a></li> | | <li><a href="https://2010.igem.org/Team:Macquarie_Australia">Home</a></li> |
| <li><a href="https://2010.igem.org/Team:Macquarie_Australia/Team">Team</a></li> | | <li><a href="https://2010.igem.org/Team:Macquarie_Australia/Team">Team</a></li> |
- | <li><a href="https://2010.igem.org/Team:Macquarie_Australia/Project">Project</li> | + | <li><a href="https://2010.igem.org/Team:Macquarie_Australia/Project">Project</a></li> |
| <li><a href="https://2010.igem.org/Team:Macquarie_Australia/Parts">Parts Submitted to the Registry</a></li> | | <li><a href="https://2010.igem.org/Team:Macquarie_Australia/Parts">Parts Submitted to the Registry</a></li> |
| <li><a href="https://2010.igem.org/Team:Macquarie_Australia/Glossary">Glossary</a></li> | | <li><a href="https://2010.igem.org/Team:Macquarie_Australia/Glossary">Glossary</a></li> |
- | <li><a href="https://2010.igem.org/Team:Macquarie_Australia/Notebook">Notebook</a></li> | + | <li><a href="https://2010.igem.org/Team:Macquarie_Australia/humanpractice">Human practice</a></li> |
| + | <li><a href="https://2010.igem.org/Team:Macquarie_Australia/Notebook">Notebook 1: <i>Agrobacterium Tumefaciens</i> |
| + | </a></li> |
| + | <li><a href="https://2010.igem.org/Team:Macquarie_Australia/Notebook2">Notebook 2: <i>Deinococcus Radiodurans</i> |
| + | </a></li> |
| + | <li><a href="https://2010.igem.org/Team:Macquarie_Australia/Notebook3">Notebook 3: Cloning |
| + | </a></li> |
| + | <li><a href="https://2010.igem.org/Team:Macquarie_Australia/Protocols and Other Methods">Protocols and Other Methods</a></li> |
| <li><a href="https://2010.igem.org/Team:Macquarie_Australia/Safety">Safety</a></li> | | <li><a href="https://2010.igem.org/Team:Macquarie_Australia/Safety">Safety</a></li> |
| <li><a href="https://2010.igem.org/Team:Macquarie_Australia/aboutus">About Us</a></li> | | <li><a href="https://2010.igem.org/Team:Macquarie_Australia/aboutus">About Us</a></li> |
Line 62: |
Line 71: |
| </div> | | </div> |
| <div id="body"> | | <div id="body"> |
- | <h1><font color="#47484c">PROJECT LAB BOOK <p> | + | <h2><font color="#47484c"><Center>PROJECT LAB BOOK</Center> <p> |
| <hr> | | <hr> |
- | | + | <Center> |
| Welcome to the Macquarie University project lab book page! <p> | | Welcome to the Macquarie University project lab book page! <p> |
| | | |
- | Here you will find a day-by-day account of our triumphs and failures.</font></h1> </hr> | + | Here you will find a day-by-day account of our triumphs and failures.</Center></font></h2> </hr> |
| | | |
| <p><p> | | <p><p> |
Line 80: |
Line 89: |
| <center><h2> A day-by-day progress for <i> Agrobacterium Tumefaciens </i> Bacteriophytochrome </h2> </center> | | <center><h2> A day-by-day progress for <i> Agrobacterium Tumefaciens </i> Bacteriophytochrome </h2> </center> |
| <p></p><p> | | <p></p><p> |
- | <big>
| |
| | | |
- | <div id = "cham"> | + | |
- | <font color="#810541"> | + | <hr> |
| + | |
| + | |
| + | <big><b> |
| | | |
| 20th August 2010 <p> | | 20th August 2010 <p> |
| | | |
- | Genomic DNA extraction <p> </big> </font> </div> | + | Genomic DNA extraction <p> </big> </b> |
| | | |
| <menu> | | <menu> |
Line 125: |
Line 136: |
| <h4>Nanodrop absorbance readings: </h4> | | <h4>Nanodrop absorbance readings: </h4> |
| | | |
- | <div align="center"> | + | <center> |
| <table> | | <table> |
| <tr> | | <tr> |
Line 154: |
Line 165: |
| </table> | | </table> |
| </center> | | </center> |
- | <p> </div> | + | <p> </center> |
| Overall, the Nanodrop readings show that we have obtained good DNA concentration with minimal protein contamination <p>= <u>SUCCESS! </u><p> | | Overall, the Nanodrop readings show that we have obtained good DNA concentration with minimal protein contamination <p>= <u>SUCCESS! </u><p> |
| | | |
| | | |
| <p><p> | | <p><p> |
- | <big><hr> | + | <big><hr><b> |
| 27th August 2010 <p> | | 27th August 2010 <p> |
| | | |
- | Primer design <p> </big> </hr> | + | Primer design <p> </big> </hr></b> |
| | | |
| | | |
Line 168: |
Line 179: |
| Various primers were designed manually and using Primer 3 Software package for PCR amplification.</li> <p> | | Various primers were designed manually and using Primer 3 Software package for PCR amplification.</li> <p> |
| <li type="disc"> | | <li type="disc"> |
- | The primers were ordered and supplied through IDT.</li><p> | + | The primers were ordered and supplied through Integrated DNA Technologies.</li><p> |
| <li type="disc"> | | <li type="disc"> |
| There was an array of various primers ordered for amplification of different products. The details of the primers are described below. </li><p> | | There was an array of various primers ordered for amplification of different products. The details of the primers are described below. </li><p> |
Line 180: |
Line 191: |
| <h4>Fwd and Rvs primers for amplification of the full length <i> A. tumefaciens </i> BphP gene: </h4> | | <h4>Fwd and Rvs primers for amplification of the full length <i> A. tumefaciens </i> BphP gene: </h4> |
| | | |
- | <div align="center"> | + | <center> |
| <table> | | <table> |
| <tr> | | <tr> |
Line 196: |
Line 207: |
| </table> | | </table> |
| </center> | | </center> |
- | <p> </div> | + | <p> |
| | | |
| | | |
Line 203: |
Line 214: |
| </h4> | | </h4> |
| | | |
- | <div align="center"> | + | <center> |
| <table> | | <table> |
| <tr> | | <tr> |
Line 219: |
Line 230: |
| </table> | | </table> |
| </center> | | </center> |
- | <p> </div> | + | <p> |
| | | |
| | | |
Line 234: |
Line 245: |
| </h4> | | </h4> |
| | | |
- | <div align="center"> | + | <center> |
| <table> | | <table> |
| <tr> | | <tr> |
Line 250: |
Line 261: |
| </table> | | </table> |
| </center> | | </center> |
- | <p> </div> | + | <p> |
| | | |
| | | |
Line 263: |
Line 274: |
| </h4> | | </h4> |
| | | |
- | <div align="center"> | + | <center> |
| <table> | | <table> |
| <tr> | | <tr> |
Line 276: |
Line 287: |
| </table> | | </table> |
| </center> | | </center> |
- | <p> </div> | + | <p> |
| | | |
| | | |
Line 286: |
Line 297: |
| <li type="disc">The reaction mastermix for the initial PCR was set up as per the following recipe (per sample): </li> | | <li type="disc">The reaction mastermix for the initial PCR was set up as per the following recipe (per sample): </li> |
| | | |
- | <div align="center"> | + | <center> |
| <table> | | <table> |
| <tr> | | <tr> |
Line 329: |
Line 340: |
| </table> | | </table> |
| </center> | | </center> |
- | <p> </div> | + | <p> |
| | | |
| | | |
Line 359: |
Line 370: |
| <h4>Experimental Design – Primer combinations: </h4> | | <h4>Experimental Design – Primer combinations: </h4> |
| | | |
- | <div align="center"> | + | <center> |
| <table> | | <table> |
| <tr> | | <tr> |
Line 413: |
Line 424: |
| </table> | | </table> |
| </center> | | </center> |
- | <p> </div> | + | <p> |
| | | |
| | | |
Line 419: |
Line 430: |
| | | |
| <li type="disc"> | | <li type="disc"> |
- | A band was seen in lane 9. This lane was using the primer and DNA template combinations of DNA2.2, (AT-BHO-F) and (AT-RVS-1) primers <p>= SUCCESS!!! </li> | + | A band was seen in lane 9. This lane was using the primer and DNA template combinations of DNA2.2, (AT-FWD-RBS) and (AT-RVS-1) primers <p>= SUCCESS!!! </li> |
- | <li type="disc">
| + | |
- | A PCR product is seen in lane 9 – this is the DNA2.2 template amplified with the (AT-FWD-RBS) and (AT-RVS-1) primers <p>= SUCCESS!! </li>
| + | |
| | | |
| | | |
Line 454: |
Line 463: |
| | | |
| <hr> | | <hr> |
- | <big> <div id = "cham"> | + | <big> <b> |
- | <font color="#810541">
| + | |
- | | + | |
| | | |
| 30th August 2010 <p> | | 30th August 2010 <p> |
| | | |
- | PCR Optimization<p> </big> </hr> </font> </div> | + | PCR Optimization<p> </big> </hr> </b> |
| | | |
| <li type="disc"> Now that we have a product obtained by the initial PCR it is time to optimize the PCR conditions using the successful DNA2.2 PCR product obtained from last week and the original DNA2.2 template </li> | | <li type="disc"> Now that we have a product obtained by the initial PCR it is time to optimize the PCR conditions using the successful DNA2.2 PCR product obtained from last week and the original DNA2.2 template </li> |
| <li type="disc"> The reaction mastermix for the PCR was set up as per the following recipe (per sample): </li> | | <li type="disc"> The reaction mastermix for the PCR was set up as per the following recipe (per sample): </li> |
| | | |
- | <div align="center"> | + | <center> |
| <table> | | <table> |
| <tr> | | <tr> |
Line 508: |
Line 515: |
| </table> | | </table> |
| </center> | | </center> |
- | <p> </div> | + | <p> |
| | | |
| <h4> The PCR program was set up as per the following: </h4> | | <h4> The PCR program was set up as per the following: </h4> |
Line 537: |
Line 544: |
| <h4>Experimental Design – Primer combinations: </h4> | | <h4>Experimental Design – Primer combinations: </h4> |
| | | |
- | <div align="center"> | + | <center> |
| <table> | | <table> |
| <tr> | | <tr> |
Line 627: |
Line 634: |
| </table> | | </table> |
| </center> | | </center> |
- | <p> </div> | + | <p> |
| | | |
| | | |
Line 653: |
Line 660: |
| | | |
| <hr> | | <hr> |
- | <big> <div id = "cham"> | + | <big> <b> |
- | <font color="#810541">
| + | |
| 3rd September 2010 <p> | | 3rd September 2010 <p> |
| | | |
- | PCR Optimization (using Gradient PCR)<p> </big> </hr> <p> </font></div> | + | PCR Optimization (using Gradient PCR)<p> </big> </hr> <p> </b> |
| | | |
| | | |
Line 671: |
Line 678: |
| <li type="disc">The reaction mastermix for the PCR was set up as per the following recipe (per sample): </li> | | <li type="disc">The reaction mastermix for the PCR was set up as per the following recipe (per sample): </li> |
| | | |
- | <div align="center"> | + | <center> |
| <table> | | <table> |
| <tr> | | <tr> |
Line 714: |
Line 721: |
| </table> | | </table> |
| </center> | | </center> |
- | <p> </div> | + | <p> </b> |
| | | |
| | | |
Line 751: |
Line 758: |
| <h4>Experimental Design – Primer combinations and annealing temperatures: </h4> | | <h4>Experimental Design – Primer combinations and annealing temperatures: </h4> |
| | | |
- | <div align="center"> | + | <center> |
| <table> | | <table> |
| <tr> | | <tr> |
Line 789: |
Line 796: |
| </table> | | </table> |
| </center> | | </center> |
- | <p> </div> | + | <p> |
| | | |
| | | |
Line 826: |
Line 833: |
| </u> | | </u> |
| | | |
- | <hr> <div id = "cham"> | + | <hr> <b> |
- | <font color="#810541">
| + | |
| <big> | | <big> |
| 7th September 2010 <p> | | 7th September 2010 <p> |
| | | |
- | PCR Optimization (using Gradient PCR) <p> </big> </hr> <p> </font></div> | + | PCR Optimization (using Gradient PCR) <p> </big> </hr> <p> </font></b> |
| | | |
| | | |
Line 849: |
Line 856: |
| | | |
| | | |
- | <div align="center"> | + | <center> |
| <table> | | <table> |
| <tr> | | <tr> |
Line 892: |
Line 899: |
| </table> | | </table> |
| </center> | | </center> |
- | <p> </div> | + | <p> </b> |
| | | |
| <h4> The PCR program was set up as per the following: </h4> | | <h4> The PCR program was set up as per the following: </h4> |
Line 920: |
Line 927: |
| <h4>Experimental Design – Primer combinations and annealing temperatures: </h4> | | <h4>Experimental Design – Primer combinations and annealing temperatures: </h4> |
| | | |
- | <div align="center"> | + | <center> |
| <table> | | <table> |
| <tr> | | <tr> |
Line 1,003: |
Line 1,010: |
| </table> | | </table> |
| </center> | | </center> |
- | <p> </div> | + | <p> |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| <hr> | | <hr> |
- | <big> <div id = "cham"> | + | <big> <b> |
- | <font color="#810541">
| + | |
| 10th September 2010 <p> | | 10th September 2010 <p> |
| | | |
- | PCR Optimization (repeated)<p> </big> </hr> <p> </font></div> | + | PCR Optimization (repeated)<p> </big> </hr> <p> </font></b> |
| | | |
| | | |
Line 1,022: |
Line 1,028: |
| | | |
| | | |
- | <div align="center"> | + | <center> |
| <table> | | <table> |
| <tr> | | <tr> |
Line 1,065: |
Line 1,071: |
| </table> | | </table> |
| </center> | | </center> |
- | <p> </div> | + | <p> |
| | | |
| | | |
Line 1,143: |
Line 1,149: |
| </h4> | | </h4> |
| | | |
- | <div align="center"> | + | <center> |
| <table> | | <table> |
| <tr> | | <tr> |
Line 1,191: |
Line 1,197: |
| </table> | | </table> |
| </center> | | </center> |
- | <p> </div> | + | <p> |
| | | |
| | | |
Line 1,235: |
Line 1,241: |
| | | |
| | | |
- | <center><h2> A day-by-day progress for <i> Deinococcus Radiodurans </i> Bacteriophytochrome Operon Construct </h2> </center>
| |
- | <p></p><p>
| |
- | <big>
| |
| | | |
- | <div id = "cham">
| |
- | <font color="#810541">
| |
| | | |
- | 16th September 2010 <p>
| |
| | | |
- | Genomic DNA extraction <p> </big> </font> </div>
| |
- |
| |
- | <menu>
| |
- | <li type="disc">
| |
- |
| |
- | <i> D. radiodurans </i>genomic DNA extracted using the BioLine Genomic DNA Extraction kit as per the manufacturer’s protocols.</li>
| |
- | <li type="disc">
| |
- | The extractions were run on a GelRed stained 1% agarose gel and photo taken for visualization (see figure 6).</li>
| |
- | <li type="disc">
| |
- | A NanoDrop spectrophotometer reading was also recorded to check the quality of the extracted genomic DNA.</li>
| |
- | <li type="disc">
| |
- | The extraction was successful for all <i>D. radiodurans </i>cell lysate samples (labeled DEINO1, DEINO2, DEINO3 (See figure below) </li>
| |
- |
| |
- | <p><h3><i><b>D. radiodurans </i> genomic DNA extraction agarose results: <p> </b> </h3>
| |
- |
| |
- | All three DNA samples show a smear of gDNA. Because the samples were treated with RNase there is no band indicative of RNA visible = SUCCESS! <p>
| |
- |
| |
- |
| |
- |
| |
- | <h4> <center><h3> Figure 6. Results of <i> D. radiodurans </i> genomic DNA extraction </h4></center></big> <p></h3>
| |
- |
| |
- | <center>
| |
- |
| |
- |
| |
- |
| |
- |
| |
- | ***********FIGURE6************
| |
- |
| |
- |
| |
- |
| |
- |
| |
- |
| |
- | <p>
| |
- |
| |
- | <b>Figure 6. </b> GelRed post-stained 1% agarose gel of genomic DNA extraction from <i> D. radiodurans </i>. In lanes 1 and 5 there is a 1kb ladder. In lane 2 is the DEINO1 sample, lane 3 is the DEINO2 sample, lane 4 is the DEINO3 sample. All three samples show a smear that is indicative of genomic DNA. The extraction has been successful!!!</p>
| |
- |
| |
- | <h4>Nanodrop absorbance readings: </h4>
| |
- |
| |
- | <div align="center">
| |
- | <table>
| |
- | <tr>
| |
- | <th>Genomic DNA sample</th>
| |
- | <th>260/280 OD ratio</th>
| |
- | <th>Concentration (ng/mL)</th>
| |
- | </tr>
| |
- | <tr>
| |
- | <td>DEINO1</td>
| |
- | <td>2.43</td>
| |
- | <td>1.443</td>
| |
- | </tr>
| |
- | <tr>
| |
- | <td>DEINO2</td>
| |
- | <td>2.55</td>
| |
- | <td>51.8</td>
| |
- | </tr>
| |
- | <tr>
| |
- | <td>DEINO3</td>
| |
- | <td>2.99</td>
| |
- | <td>88.7</td>
| |
- | </tr>
| |
- | </table>
| |
- | </center>
| |
- | <p> </div>
| |
- | Overall, the Nanodrop readings show that we have obtained good DNA concentration with minimal protein contamination <p>= <u>SUCCESS! </u><p>
| |
- |
| |
- |
| |
- | <p><p>
| |
- | <big><hr>
| |
- | 27th August 2010 <p>
| |
- |
| |
- | Primer design <p> </big> </hr>
| |
- |
| |
- |
| |
- | <li type="disc">
| |
- | Various primers were designed manually and using Primer 3 Software package for PCR amplification. </li> <p>
| |
- |
| |
- | <li type="disc"> The primers were ordered and supplied through Integrated DNA Technologies.</li> <p>
| |
- |
| |
- | <li type="disc"> There was an array of various primers ordered for amplification of different products. The details of the primers are described below.
| |
- | </li> <p>
| |
- |
| |
- |
| |
- |
| |
- |
| |
- |
| |
- |
| |
- |
| |
- |
| |
- |
| |
- | <h4>Fwd and Rvs primers for amplification of the full length <i> D. radiodurans </i> BphP gene: </h4>
| |
- |
| |
- | <div align="center">
| |
- | <table>
| |
- | <tr>
| |
- | <th>Primer name</th>
| |
- | <th>Primer Sequence</th>
| |
- | </tr>
| |
- | <tr>
| |
- | <td> (DR-FWD-1)</td>
| |
- | <td>5’-ATG AGC CGG GAC CCG TTG -3’</td>
| |
- | </tr>
| |
- | <tr>
| |
- | <td>(DR-RVS-1)</td>
| |
- | <td>5’-TCA GGC ATC GGC GGC TCC -3’</td>
| |
- | </tr>
| |
- | </table>
| |
- | </center>
| |
- | <p> </div>
| |
- |
| |
- |
| |
- |
| |
- | <h4>Fwd and Rvs primers for amplification of the full length <i> D. radiodurans </i>BphP gene for insertion in the operon <u>BEFORE</u> the HO gene:
| |
- | </h4>
| |
- |
| |
- | <div align="center">
| |
- | <table>
| |
- | <tr>
| |
- | <th>Primer name</th>
| |
- | <th>Primer Sequence</th>
| |
- | </tr>
| |
- | <tr>
| |
- | <td>(DR-BHO-F)</td>
| |
- | <td>5’- AAG GAG ATA TAC ATA TGA TGA GCC GGG ACC CGT TG – 3’</td>
| |
- | </tr>
| |
- | <tr>
| |
- | <td>(DR-BHO-R)</td>
| |
- | <td> 5’- AAG TTG ACA CTC ATA TGA GCA GCC CTC CTT CAG GC – 3’</td>
| |
- | </tr>
| |
- | </table>
| |
- | </center>
| |
- | <p> </div>
| |
- |
| |
- |
| |
- |
| |
- |
| |
- |
| |
- |
| |
- |
| |
- |
| |
- |
| |
- | <h4>
| |
- | Fwd and Rvs primers for amplification of the full length <i>D. radiodurans </i> BphP gene for insertion in the operon <u>AFTER </u>the HO gene in the operon:
| |
- |
| |
- | </h4>
| |
- |
| |
- | <div align="center">
| |
- | <table>
| |
- | <tr>
| |
- | <th>Primer name</th>
| |
- | <th>Primer Sequence</th>
| |
- | </tr>
| |
- | <tr>
| |
- | <td>(DR-AHO-F)</td>
| |
- | <td>5’- CCG AAG GCT AGG ATC CAG GAG GGC TGC TAT GAG C – 3’</td>
| |
- | </tr>
| |
- | <tr>
| |
- | <td> (DR-AHO-R)</td>
| |
- | <td> 5’- GTT AGC AGC CGG ATC CTC AGG CAT GGG CGG CTC C – 3’ </td>
| |
- | </tr>
| |
- | </table>
| |
- | </center>
| |
- | <p> </div>
| |
- |
| |
- |
| |
- |
| |
- |
| |
- |
| |
- |
| |
- |
| |
- | <h4>
| |
- | Fwd and Rvs primers for amplification of the full length <i>D. radiodurans </i> BphP gene for insertion in the operon <u>AFTER </u>the HO gene as well as the addition of a ribosome binding site or Shine Delgano sequence:
| |
- |
| |
- | </h4>
| |
- |
| |
- | <div align="center">
| |
- | <table>
| |
- | <tr>
| |
- | <th>Primer name</th>
| |
- | <th>Primer Sequence</th>
| |
- | </tr>
| |
- | <tr>
| |
- | <td>(DR-FWD-RBS)</td>
| |
- | <td> 5’- AGG AGG GCT GCT ATG AGC CGG GAC CCG TTG -3’</td>
| |
- | </tr>
| |
- |
| |
- | </table>
| |
- | </center>
| |
- | <p> </div>
| |
- |
| |
- |
| |
- |
| |
- |
| |
- | <hr>
| |
- | <big> <div id = "cham">
| |
- | <font color="#810541">
| |
- |
| |
- |
| |
- | 22nd September 2010 <p>
| |
- |
| |
- | Initial PCR (gradient PCR)<p> </big> </hr> </font> </div>
| |
- |
| |
- | <li type="disc"> The reaction mastermix for the PCR was set up as per the following recipe (per sample): </li>
| |
- |
| |
- | <div align="center">
| |
- | <table>
| |
- | <tr>
| |
- | <th>Mastermix:</th>
| |
- | <th>Amount per sample (ul)</th>
| |
- | </tr>
| |
- |
| |
- | <tr>
| |
- | <td>Gibco H2O</td>
| |
- | <td> 13.75</td>
| |
- | </tr>
| |
- | <tr>
| |
- | <td>10x Buffer</td>
| |
- | <td> 2.00</td>
| |
- | </tr>
| |
- | <tr>
| |
- | <td>Polymerase enzyme</td>
| |
- | <td> 0.25</td>
| |
- | </tr>
| |
- | <tr>
| |
- | <td>dNTP</td>
| |
- | <td> 1.00</td>
| |
- | </tr>
| |
- | <tr>
| |
- | <td>Fwd primer </td>
| |
- | <td> 1.00</td>
| |
- | </tr>
| |
- | <tr>
| |
- | <td>Rvs primer </td>
| |
- | <td> 1.00</td>
| |
- | </tr>
| |
- | <tr>
| |
- | <td>Genomic DNA</td>
| |
- | <td> 1.00</td>
| |
- | </tr>
| |
- | <tr>
| |
- | <td><b>Total </b></td>
| |
- | <td> <b>20.00</b></td>
| |
- | </tr>
| |
- |
| |
- |
| |
- | </table>
| |
- | </center>
| |
- | <p> </div>
| |
- |
| |
- | <h4> The PCR program was set up as per the following: </h4>
| |
- | <ol>
| |
- |
| |
- | <li> 94˚C for 2 minutes </li>
| |
- |
| |
- | <li>94˚C for 30 seconds </li>
| |
- | <li> 55-65˚C for 30 seconds </li>
| |
- | <li>72˚C for 2 minutes & 30 seconds</li> <p>
| |
- |
| |
- | (This was repeated for another 25 cycles)
| |
- |
| |
- | <li> 72˚C for 5 minutes </li>
| |
- | <li> 4˚C to end. </ol></li> <p>
| |
- |
| |
- |
| |
- |
| |
- |
| |
- |
| |
- | <li type="disc">
| |
- |
| |
- | Different combinations of the primers were used for the initial PCR reaction (see below ‘Experimental Design’ section following) </li>
| |
- | <li type="disc">
| |
- | Not all possible primer combinations were used </li>
| |
- | <li type="disc">
| |
- | The PCR products were run on a 2% GelRed post-stained agarose gel for visualisation (see picture of gel below). </li>
| |
- | <p>
| |
- |
| |
- |
| |
- |
| |
- |
| |
- |
| |
- |
| |
- |
| |
- |
| |
- |
| |
- |
| |
- |
| |
- |
| |
- | <h4>Experimental Design – Primer combinations and annealing temperatures: </h4>
| |
- |
| |
- | <div align="center">
| |
- | <table>
| |
- | <tr>
| |
- | <th> DNA template </th>
| |
- | <th> Dilution </th>
| |
- | <th> Fwd primer </th>
| |
- | <th> Rvs primer </th>
| |
- | <th> Annealing temp (Degrees Celsius) </th>
| |
- |
| |
- | </tr>
| |
- |
| |
- | <tr>
| |
- | <td> DEINO1 </td>
| |
- | <td> 1:20</td>
| |
- | <td> (DR-FWD)</td>
| |
- | <td> (DR-RVS)</td>
| |
- | <td> 55, 57, 60, 62, 65 </td>
| |
- |
| |
- | </tr>
| |
- |
| |
- |
| |
- | <tr>
| |
- | <td> DEINO2 </td>
| |
- | <td> 1:20</td>
| |
- | <td> (DR-FWD)</td>
| |
- | <td> (DR-RVS)</td>
| |
- | <td> 55, 57, 60, 62, 65</td>
| |
- | </tr>
| |
- |
| |
- | <tr>
| |
- | <td> DEINO1 </td>
| |
- | <td> 1:20</td>
| |
- | <td> (DR-FWD-RBS) </td>
| |
- | <td> (DR-RVS) </td>
| |
- | <td> 55, 57, 60, 62, 65 </td>
| |
- | </tr>
| |
- |
| |
- | <tr>
| |
- | <td> DEINO2 </td>
| |
- | <td> 1:20</td>
| |
- | <td> (DR-FWD-RBS) </td>
| |
- | <td> (DR-RVS) </td>
| |
- | <td> 55, 57, 60, 62, 65 </td>
| |
- | </tr>
| |
- |
| |
- | <tr>
| |
- | <td> DEINO1 </td>
| |
- | <td> 1:20</td>
| |
- | <td> (DR-FWD) </td>
| |
- | <td> (DR-AHO-R) </td>
| |
- | <td> 55, 57, 60, 62, 65 </td>
| |
- | </tr>
| |
- |
| |
- |
| |
- | <tr>
| |
- | <td> DEINO2 </td>
| |
- | <td> 1:20</td>
| |
- | <td> (DR-FWD) </td>
| |
- | <td> (DR-AHO-R) </td>
| |
- | <td> 55, 57, 60, 62, 65 </td>
| |
- | </tr>
| |
- |
| |
- |
| |
- | <tr>
| |
- | <td> DEINO1 </td>
| |
- | <td> 1:20</td>
| |
- | <td> (DR-FWD-RBS) </td>
| |
- | <td> (DR-AHO-R) </td>
| |
- | <td> 55, 57, 60, 62, 65 </td>
| |
- | </tr>
| |
- |
| |
- |
| |
- | <tr>
| |
- | <td> DEINO2 </td>
| |
- | <td>1:20</td>
| |
- | <td> (DR-FWD-RBS) </td>
| |
- | <td> (DR-AHO-R)</td>
| |
- | <td> 55, 57, 60, 62, 65 </td>
| |
- | </tr>
| |
- |
| |
- | <tr>
| |
- | <td> DEINO1 </td>
| |
- | <td>1:50</td>
| |
- | <td> (DR-FWD) </td>
| |
- | <td> (DR-RVS)</td>
| |
- | <td> 55, 57, 60, 62, 65 </td>
| |
- | </tr>
| |
- |
| |
- | <tr>
| |
- | <td> DEINO2 </td>
| |
- | <td>1:50</td>
| |
- | <td> (DR-FWD) </td>
| |
- | <td> (DR-RVS)</td>
| |
- | <td> 55, 57, 60, 62, 65</td>
| |
- | </tr>
| |
- |
| |
- | <tr>
| |
- | <td> DEINO1 </td>
| |
- | <td>1:50</td>
| |
- | <td> (DR-FWD-RBS) </td>
| |
- | <td> (DR-RVS)</td>
| |
- | <td> 55, 57, 60, 62, 65 </td>
| |
- | </tr>
| |
- |
| |
- | <tr>
| |
- | <td> DEINO2 </td>
| |
- | <td>1:50</td>
| |
- | <td> (DR-FWD-RBS) </td>
| |
- | <td> (DR-RVS)</td>
| |
- | <td> 55, 57, 60, 62, 65 </td>
| |
- | </tr>
| |
- |
| |
- | <tr>
| |
- | <td> DEINO1 </td>
| |
- | <td>1:50</td>
| |
- | <td> (DR-FWD) </td>
| |
- | <td> (DR-AHO-R)</td>
| |
- | <td> 55, 57, 60, 62, 65 </td>
| |
- | </tr>
| |
- |
| |
- | <tr>
| |
- | <td> DEINO2 </td>
| |
- | <td>1:50</td>
| |
- | <td> (DR-FWD) </td>
| |
- | <td> (DR-AHO-R)</td>
| |
- | <td> 55, 57, 60, 62, 65 </td>
| |
- | </tr>
| |
- |
| |
- | <tr>
| |
- | <td> DEINO1 </td>
| |
- | <td>1:50</td>
| |
- | <td> (DR-FWD-RBS) </td>
| |
- | <td> (DR-AHO-R)</td>
| |
- | <td> 55, 57, 60, 62, 65 </td>
| |
- | </tr>
| |
- |
| |
- | <tr>
| |
- | <td> DEINO2 </td>
| |
- | <td>1:50</td>
| |
- | <td> (DR-FWD-RBS) </td>
| |
- | <td> (DR-AHO-R)</td>
| |
- | <td> 55, 57, 60, 62, 65 </td>
| |
- | </tr>
| |
- |
| |
- | <tr>
| |
- | <td> (-) control </td>
| |
- | <td>-</td>
| |
- | <td> (DR-FWD) </td>
| |
- | <td> (DR-RVS)</td>
| |
- | <td> 55, 57, 60, 62, 65 </td>
| |
- | </tr>
| |
- |
| |
- | </table>
| |
- | </center>
| |
- | <p> </div>
| |
- |
| |
- |
| |
- |
| |
- | <li type="disc">All 85 reactions were unsuccessful and no bands were visible on the gel = BACK TO THE DRAWING BOARD! </li>
| |
- |
| |
- |
| |
- |
| |
- |
| |
- |
| |
- |
| |
- |
| |
- | <hr>
| |
- | <big> <div id = "cham">
| |
- | <font color="#810541">
| |
- | 27th September 2010 <p>
| |
- |
| |
- | PCR with FailSafeTM PCR system<p> </big> </hr> <p> </font></div>
| |
- |
| |
- |
| |
- | <li type="disc">As the 85 reactions that were run were unsuccessful we decided to purchase a commercial PCR system called the FailSafeTM System from EpiCentre Biotechnologies </li>
| |
- | <li type="disc">It was speculated that the amplification didn’t work due to either the enzyme / buffer or the combination. It didn’t seem to be the annealing temperatures because a range of temperatures were tested in the previous PCR </li>
| |
- | <li type="disc">The FailSafeTM PCR System includes 12 different enzyme / buffer combinations so we decided to try this with two different annealing temperatures (56˚C and 60˚C) </li>
| |
- |
| |
- |
| |
- |
| |
- |
| |
- | <h4> The PCR program was set up as per the following: </h4>
| |
- | <ol>
| |
- |
| |
- | <li> 94˚C for 2 minutes </li>
| |
- |
| |
- | <li>94˚C for 30 seconds </li>
| |
- | <li> 56˚C or 60˚C for 30 seconds </li>
| |
- | <li>72˚C for 3 minutes </li> <p>
| |
- |
| |
- | (This was repeated for another 25 cycles)
| |
- |
| |
- | <li> 72˚C for 10 minutes </li>
| |
- | <li> 4˚C to end. </ol></li> <p>
| |
- |
| |
- | <li type="disc">
| |
- |
| |
- | The PCR products were run on a GelRed stained 2% agarose gel using a 1kb ladder for visualization (see figure 2 below)</li>
| |
- | <li type="disc">
| |
- | We have successfully amplified the D. radiodurans bacteriophytochrome gene! SUCCESS! </li>
| |
- |
| |
- |
| |
- |
| |
- |
| |
- | <h4>Experimental Design – Primer combinations: </h4>
| |
- |
| |
- | <div align="center">
| |
- | <table>
| |
- | <tr>
| |
- | <th>Template DNA</th>
| |
- | <th>Dilution</th>
| |
- | <th>Fwd Primer</th>
| |
- | <th>Rvs primer</th>
| |
- | <th>FailSafe system</th>
| |
- | </tr>
| |
- |
| |
- |
| |
- | <tr>
| |
- | <td>DEINO1</td>
| |
- | <td> 1:100 </td>
| |
- | <td> DR-FWD-1</td>
| |
- | <td> DR-RVS-1</td>
| |
- | <td> (All 12 FailSafe premixed combinations)</td>
| |
- | </tr>
| |
- |
| |
- | <tr>
| |
- | <td>DEINO2</td>
| |
- | <td> 1:100</td>
| |
- | <td> DR-FWD-1</td>
| |
- | <td> DR-RVS-1</td>
| |
- | <td> (All 12 FailSafe premixed combinations)</td>
| |
- | </tr>
| |
- |
| |
- |
| |
- |
| |
- | </table>
| |
- | </center>
| |
- | <p> </div>
| |
- |
| |
- | <p><h3><b> FailSafe PCRTM System results: </p></h3>
| |
- |
| |
- |
| |
- | <li type="disc">
| |
| | | |
| | | |
PROJECT LAB BOOK
Welcome to the Macquarie University project lab book page!
Here you will find a day-by-day account of our triumphs and failures.
A day-by-day progress for Agrobacterium Tumefaciens Bacteriophytochrome
20th August 2010
Genomic DNA extraction
- The first primer pair is (AT-BHO-F) with (AT-BHO-R) [this will insert the bacteriophytchrome gene BEFORE the heme oxygenase gene in the operon]
- The second primer pair is (AT-AHO-F) with (AT-AHO-R) [this will insert the bacteriophytochrome gene AFTER the heme oxygenase gene in the operon]
A technique called gradient PCR will be used here. This PCR includes different annealing temperatures so that the optimum annealing temperature for the primers can be determined.
This should also result in reduced non-specific binding that was observed in the previous PCR result
The reaction mastermix for the PCR was set up as per the following recipe (per sample):
Mastermix: |
Amount per sample (ul) |
Gibco H2O |
13.75 |
10x Buffer |
2.00 |
Polymerase enzyme |
0.25 |
dNTP |
1.00 |
Fwd primer |
1.00 |
Rvs primer |
1.00 |
Genomic DNA |
1.00 |
Total |
20.00 |
The PCR program was set up as per the following:
- 94˚C for 2 minutes
- 94˚C for 30 seconds
- 60˚C for 30 seconds
- 72˚C for 2 minutes & 30 seconds
(This was repeated for another 25 cycles)
- 72˚C for 10 minutes
- 4˚C to end.
The PCR products were run on a GelRed post-stained 2% agarose gel using a 1kb ladder for visualization
The products were run on a GelRed post-stained 2% agarose gel for visualization
No products were observed
Experimental Design – Primer combinations and annealing temperatures:
Fwd Primer |
Rvs primer |
Temp 1 (Degrees Celsius) |
Temp 2 (Degrees Celsius) |
Temp 3 (Degrees Celsius) |
Temp 4 (Degrees Celsius) |
Temp 5 (Degrees Celsius) |
(AT-BHO-F) |
(AT-BHO-R) |
57.1 |
58.7 |
60.6 |
63.4 |
64.8 |
(AT-AHO-F) |
(AT-AHO-R) |
57.1 |
58.7 |
60.6 |
63.4 |
64.8 |
Figure 4. PCR Optimisation (gradient PCR) results
Figure 4. No product amplification is seen in any lanes. The anticipated product is approximately 1.6 to 3.0kb. The gel had been over run and at the very bottom some bands can be seen but as these are so small they are possibly dimers that are less than 300bp.
No products were observed. The anticipated product size was between 1.6kb and 3kb. The gel was over run but the only products that were over run were probably primer dimers, which are less than 300bp in size. = FAIL!
7th September 2010
PCR Optimization (using Gradient PCR)
The PCR run on 3rd September wasn’t successful so this was repeated
This time however, only the PCR product was used as a template in two different dilutions (1:100 and 1:200)
Additionally, two different annealing temperatures were used: 60 and 65C
The primer pairs used in the previous PCR were also used again for the insertion of the bacteriophytochrome gene and heme oxygenase in different orientations in the operon
The reaction mastermix for the PCR was set up as per the following recipe (per sample):
Mastermix: |
Amount per sample (ul) |
Gibco H2O |
13.75 |
10x Buffer |
2.00 |
Polymerase enzyme |
0.25 |
dNTP |
1.00 |
Fwd primer |
1.00 |
Rvs primer |
1.00 |
Genomic DNA |
1.00 |
Total |
20.00 |
The PCR program was set up as per the following:
- 94˚C for 2 minutes
- 94˚C for 30 seconds
- 60˚C for 30 seconds
- 72˚C for 2 minutes & 30 seconds
(This was repeated for another 25 cycles)
- 72˚C for 10 minutes
- 4˚C to end.
The PCR products were run on a GelRed post-stained 2% agarose gel using a 1kb ladder for visualization
There was no amplification observed in any of the lanes so the picture of this gel is not included = FAIL!
Experimental Design – Primer combinations and annealing temperatures:
DNA template |
Dilution |
Fwd primer |
Rvs primer |
Annealing temp (Degrees Celsius) |
PCR product (from DNA2.2) |
1:100 |
(AT-BHO-F) |
(AT-BHO-R) |
60 |
PCR product (from DNA2.2) |
1:200 |
(AT-BHO-F) |
(AT-BHO-R) |
60 |
PCR product (from DNA2.2) |
1:100 |
(AT-AHO-F) |
(AT-AHO-R) |
60 |
PCR product (from DNA2.2) |
1:200 |
(AT-AHO-F) |
(AT-AHO-R) |
60 |
PCR product (from DNA2.2) |
1:100 |
(AT-BHO-F) |
(AT-BHO-R) |
65 |
PCR product (from DNA2.2) |
1:200 |
(AT-BHO-F) |
(AT-BHO-R) |
65 |
PCR product (from DNA2.2) |
1:100 |
(AT-AHO-F) |
(AT-AHO-R) |
65 |
PCR product (from DNA2.2) |
1:200 |
(AT-AHO-F) |
(AT-AHO-R) |
65 |
10th September 2010
PCR Optimization (repeated)
As we were having trouble with one of the primers annealing we attempted a PCR technique that required a different PCR program to be set
The (AT-AHO-F)– (AT-AHO-R)primer pair were run on the normal PCR program being used for all other PCR’s as these primers were annealing properly
The primer pair that we were having difficulty with ((AT-BHO-F)-(AT-BHO-R)) required a special PCR program. This would allow for the (AT-BHO-R)primer to anneal to the template first for single stranded amplification and then the (AT-BHO-F)primer to bind later.
The reaction mastermix for the PCR was set up as per the following recipe (per sample):
Mastermix: |
Amount per sample (ul) |
Gibco H2O |
13.75 |
10x Buffer |
2.00 |
Polymerase enzyme |
0.25 |
dNTP |
1.00 |
Fwd primer |
1.00 |
Rvs primer |
1.00 |
Genomic DNA |
1.00 |
Total |
20.00 |
The first PCR program was set up as per the following:
- 94˚C for 2 minutes
- 94˚C for 30 seconds
- 60˚C for 30 seconds
- 72˚C for 2 minutes & 30 seconds
(This was repeated for another 35 cycles)
- 72˚C for 10 minutes
- 4˚C to end.
The second PCR program was set up as per the following (this was for the amplification of product using the (AT-FWD-RBS) and (AT-AHO-R) primer pair):
- 94˚C for 2 minutes
- 94˚C for 30 seconds
- 40˚C for 30 seconds
- 72˚C for 2 minutes & 30 seconds
(This was repeated for another 35 cycles)
- 72˚C for 10 minutes
- 4˚C to end.
- The second PCR program was set up as per the following. There were two parts to this PCR to allow for the (AT-BHO-F) primer to anneal properly after initial annealing of the (AT-BHO-R) primer.
- 94˚C for 2 minutes
- 94˚C for 30 seconds
- 40˚C for 30 seconds
- 72˚C for 2 minutes and 30 seconds
(This was repeated for another 4 cycles)
- Now we can add the (AT-BHO-F) primer to the reaction.
- 4˚C for 5 minutes
- 94˚C for 30 seconds
- 60˚C for 30 seconds
- 72˚C for 2 minutes and 30 seconds
(This was repeated for another 31 cycles)
- 72˚C for 10 minutes
- 4˚C to end
- The PCR products were run on a GelRed post-stained 2% agarose gel using a 1kb ladder for visualization
Experimental Design – Primer combinations and annealing temperatures:
Template |
Primer pair |
Annealing temp (degrees Celsius) |
Number of cycles |
(AT-FWD-RBS)-(AT-RVS-1)PCR product |
(AT-BHO-F)-(AT-BHO-R) |
40, then 60 |
4, then 35 |
(AT-FWD-RBS)-(AT-AHO-R)PCR product |
(AT-AHO-F)-(AT-AHO-R) |
60 |
35 |
(AT-FWD-RBS)-(AT-RVS-1)PCR product (1:10 dilution) |
(AT-BHO-F)-(AT-BHO-R) |
40, then 60 |
4 then 35 |
(AT-FWD-RBS)-(AT-AHO-R)PCR product (1:10 dilution) |
(AT-AHO-F)-(AT-AHO-R) |
60 |
35 |
Figure 5. PCR optimization (with ssPCR amplification for (AT-BHO-F)primer)
Figure 5. GelRed post-stained 2% agarose gel of optimized PCR using primer pairs for insertion of the heme oxygenase gene and bacteriophytochrome gene. In lanes 1 and 6 there is a 1kb ladder. In lane 2 there is the (AT-FWD-RBS)-(AT-RVS-1)PCR product amplified with (AT-BHO-F)-(AT-BHO-R)primer pair on the special PCR program allowing for the (AT-BHO-R)primer to bind first. In lane 3 there is the (AT-FWD-RBS)-(AT-AHO-R)PCR product amplified with (AT-AHO-F)-(AT-AHO-R)primer pair on the normal PCR program. In lane 4 there is the (AT-FWD-RBS)-(AT-RVS-1)PCR product diluted 1:10 amplified with (AT-BHO-F)-(AT-BHO-R)primer pair on the special PCR program allowing for the (AT-BHO-R)primer to bind first. In lane 5 there is the (AT-FWD-RBS)-(AT-AHO-R) PCR product diluted 1:10 amplified with (AT-AHO-F)-(AT-AHO-R)primer pair on the normal PCR program. There is a product band seen in lane 3 – SUCCESS! This is the product with the bacteriophytochrome gene inserted AFTER the heme oxygenase gene.
Discussion of gradient PCR:
The gradient PCR was used because the (AT-BHO-R) primer that was ordered was 12 base pairs shorter than what was supposed to be ordered. The (AT-BHO-R)primer was supposed to include the whole reverse primer sequence (18 base pairs) as well as an additional sequence for the HO site. This caused an issue with this primer annealing in previous PCR reactions. The gradient PCR will allow for this primer to anneal prior to any other primer annealing increasing the chance of annealing.