# Team:Tokyo Tech/Project/Artificial Cooperation System

(Difference between revisions)
 Revision as of 19:50, 27 October 2010 (view source)Kitano (Talk | contribs) (→Genetic Circuit)← Older edit Revision as of 19:56, 27 October 2010 (view source)Kitano (Talk | contribs) (→Mathematical modeling)Newer edit → Line 351: Line 351: ==Mathematical modeling== ==Mathematical modeling== In order to confirm that this system is feasible, we simulated this system. The following figures 〇〇 show the simulation result. We held a series of simulations under several experimental conditions. Fig◯◯〜Fig◯◯ are the results. Fig1 is the case without antibiotic. In this case, cell A and cell B show no difference of growth. Fig2 is the condition with chloramphenicol while Artificial Cooperation System is not working. Graph shows that cellA decrease by chloramphenicol. Fig.3 is the condition with chloramphenicol while Artificial Cooperation System is working. The graph shows turnover of CellA, which means it was rescued by Artificial Cooperation System. Fig4 is the condition with Kanamycin while Artificial Cooperation System is working. This time, number of CellB decrease at first, though recover at the end. From the simulation results above, we can conclude that our system can work under a certain situation. In order to confirm that this system is feasible, we simulated this system. The following figures 〇〇 show the simulation result. We held a series of simulations under several experimental conditions. Fig◯◯〜Fig◯◯ are the results. Fig1 is the case without antibiotic. In this case, cell A and cell B show no difference of growth. Fig2 is the condition with chloramphenicol while Artificial Cooperation System is not working. Graph shows that cellA decrease by chloramphenicol. Fig.3 is the condition with chloramphenicol while Artificial Cooperation System is working. The graph shows turnover of CellA, which means it was rescued by Artificial Cooperation System. Fig4 is the condition with Kanamycin while Artificial Cooperation System is working. This time, number of CellB decrease at first, though recover at the end. From the simulation results above, we can conclude that our system can work under a certain situation. - [[IMAGE: tokyotech_no_anti_sim_result.jpg|300px|left|thumb|Fig3-4-1. When the system worked and any antibiotics did not exist (work done by Shohei Kitano)]] + [[IMAGE:tokyotech_no_anti_sim_result_cell.jpg|300px|left|thumb|Fig3-0-2 Simulation result in absence of antibiotics. This work done by Shohei Kitano]] - [[IMAGE: tokyotech_no_system_sim_result.jpg|300px|left|thumb|Fig3-4-2. when the system did not work and chloramphenicol existed (work done by Shohei Kitano)]] + [[IMAGE:Tokyptech no system sim result.jpg|300px|left|thumb|Fig3-0-3 Simulation result without Artificial Cooperation System. This work done by Shohei Kitano]] Line 360: Line 360: - [[IMAGE: tokyotech_cm_sim_result.jpg|300px|left|thumb|Fig3-4-3 when the system worked and chloramphenicol existed (work done by Shohei Kitano)]] + - [[IMAGE: tokyotech_kan_sim_result.jpg|300px|left|thumb|Fig3-4-4 when the system worked and Kanamycin existed (work done by Shohei Kitano) ]] + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + [[IMAGE:tokyotech_cm_sim_result_cell.jpg|300px|left|thumb|Fig3-0-4 Simulation result in the presence of chloramphenicol. This work done by Shohei Kitano]] + [[IMAGE:tokyotech_kan_sim_result_cell.jpg|300px|left|thumb|Fog3-0-5 Simulation result in the presence of kanamycin. This work done by Shohei Kitano]] +

## Revision as of 19:56, 27 October 2010

iGEM Tokyo Tech 2010 "E.coli with Humanity"

3 Artificial Cooperation System                    -YOU ARE HERE!- 3-1 lux activation/repression promoter 3-2 resistance gene activation device 3-3 luxI Assay 3-4 modeling 1 Graphical abstract 2 Apple reporter 2-1 Color 2-2 Fragrance 4 wolfcoli overview 4-1 the new seriesof PompC 4-2 lacIM1 for band-detect network 4-3 wolfcoli system

3 Artificial Cooperation System

# Abstract

We built Artificial Cooperation System to engineered E.coli with humanity. In this system quorum sensing and chloramphenicol generator activated by LuxR are very important. First, we constructed and characterized several promoters regulated by LuxR and 3OC6HSL. We designed and constructed a new LuxR repression promoter. Also, we characterized the functions of a LuxR repression promoter and a LuxR activation promoter in the registry. Second, we constructed a new chloramphenicol resistance gene generator which is regulated by LuxR activation promoter. We confirmed that the cell with the chloramphenicol resistance gene generator under high concentration of chloramphenicol when 3OC6HSL exists. Third, we confirmed the feasibility of Artificial Cooperation System from simulation and experimental data.

fig.3-1-1 luxR activation promoter assay (worked by Kitano Shohei & Eriko Uchikoshi)
fig.3-1-3 luxR repression promoter assay (worked by Shohei Kitano & Eriko Uchikoshi)

Fig3 Chloramphenicol resistance device. This work done by Yusuke Kaneta
Fig4 LuxI and LuxR activation promoter assay. This work done by Eriko Uchikoshi and Shohei Kitano

# Introduction

## What’s Artificial Cooperation System?

Artificial Cooperation System was built to engineer E. coli that behaves kindly and have sympathy. This system consists of two types of cells. In normal conditions, they are competitors for survival. While in critical conditions, such that one is dying, another cell would notice the crisis of dying cell and help her. This is a summary of the Artificial Cooperation System.

Fig 3-1.They are competitors. 2.One is dying, another cell notices it. 3.The healthy cell rescues the dying cell. 4. The dying cell recovers and she gives "Apples" as expression of appreciation

## Genetic Circuit

### I, genetic circuit overview

We designed the following circuit. In Artificial Cooperation System, there are two types of E. coli, Cell A and Cell B. Cell A has resistance to kanamycin and Cell B has resistance to chloramphenicol originally. (See more…)

Fig3-2.Genetic circuit in cell A
Fig3-3.Genetic circuit in cell B

Pcon: constitutive promoter.
Plux act: promoter activated by LuxR and 3OC6HSL. We call this promoter luxR activation promoter.
Plux rep: promoter repressed by LuxR and 3OC6HSL. We call this promoter luxR repression promoter.
Plas act: promoter activated by LasR and 3OC12HSL. We call this promoter lasR activation promoter.
Plas rep: promoter repressed by LasR and 3OC12HSL. We call this promoter lasR repression promoter.
lasI: enzyme repressed by LuxR and 3OC6HSL. We call this promoter LuxR repression promoter.
luxI: enzyme repressed by LasR and 3OC12HSL. We call this promoter LasR repression promoter.

In cell A, production of LasI is repressed by LuxR/3OC6HSL complex and that of Cm resistance gene is activated by LuxR/3OC6HSL complex. In cell B, production of LuxI is repressed by LasR/3OC12HSL complex and that of Kan resistance gene is activated by LasR/3OC12HSL complex. This means that 3OC12HSL produced by cell A and 3OC6HSL produced by cell B indirectly repress each other’s production. And 3OC12HSL activates resistance gene of cell B while 3OC6HSL activates resistance gene of cell A. Apple gene is composed of crtEBIYZW and MpAAT1. This expresses only when the cell is rescued and recovered.

Normal

Fig3-4. Normal condition
Fig3-5. Normal condition

In normal situation, Cell A and Cell B are competitors and recognize each other by using quorum sensing. First, LasI protein in Cell A produces 3OC12HSL. Second, these signal molecules diffuse through cell membranes and bind to LasR protein in Cell B. Third, LasR/3OC12HSL complex represses the production of LuxI protein. Similarly in cell B, LuxI protein produces 3OC6HSL. These signal molecules diffuse through cell membranes and bind to LuxR protein in Cell A. LuxR/3OC6HSL complex represses the production of LasI protein. Although Cell A and Cell B have chloramphenicol and kanamycin resistance gene respectively, they don’t express in this situation. This is because the concentration of 3OC12HSL and 3OC6HSL is too low to activate the expressions of kanamycin resistance gene and chloramphenicol resistance gene, respectively.
when Cell A is dying

Fig 3-6. Cell A is dying.
Fig 3-7. Cell A is dying.

As we mentioned, originally Cell A has a resistance gene against kanamycin and does not have that against chloramphenicol. On the other hand, Cell B has resistance to chloramphenicol and doesn’t have resistance to kanamycin. Therefore, the addition of chloramphenicol only decreases the number of Cell A. It means that 3OC12HSL decreases. It also results in the decrease of LasR/3OC12HSL complex that repress the expression of LasI in Cell B. By this process, Cell B notices that Cell A is dying and tries to rescue it.
when Cell B tries to rescue Cell A

Fig 3-8. Cell B is trying to rescue cell A
Fig 3-9. Cell B is trying to resucue cell A
Fig 3-10. Cell A is rescued by cell B.
Fig 3-11. Cell A is rescued by cell B.

As we mentioned, originally Cell A has a resistance gene against kanamycin and does not have that against chloramphenicol. On the other hand, Cell B has resistance to chloramphenicol and doesn’t have resistance to kanamycin. Therefore, the addition of chloramphenicol only decreases the number of Cell A. It means that 3OC12HSL decreases. It also results in the decrease of LasR/3OC12HSL complex that repress the expression of LasI in Cell B. By this process, Cell B notices that Cell A is dying and tries to rescue it.

# Result

In order to make the Artificial Cooperation System, we constructed and characterized several important parts and devices. First we characterized LuxR repression promoter R0061 and activation promoter R0062. Second, we designed and characterized a new LuxR repression promoter K395008. Third, we designed and characterized a NEW BioBrick device K395162, a chloramphenicol resistance generator, which is activated by a LuxR activation promoter. Forth, we confirmed that LuxI can produce sufficient AHL to help dying cell. Finally, we simulated our Artificial Cooperation System and confirmed the feasibility of our system.

## LuxR repression promoter and activation promoter

We characterized LuxR repression promoters and activation promoters, which plays important roles in the Artificial Cooperation System. The following figures are the result of experiments. Fig3-1-2 shows that under the regulations by R0061 and K395008, gfp expressions were repressed in the presence of 3OC6HSL. Fig3-1-1 shows that under the regulations by R0062,a LuxR activation promoter, gfp expression was activated in the presence of 3OC6HSL. Also, for realization of the Artificial Cooperative System work, the strength and the threshold of these promoters are so important. Thus we tried tuning promoters by changing sequence of consensus -35/-10 and lux box. (See more…)

fig.3-1-1 luxR activation promoter assay (worked by Kitano Shohei & Eriko Uchikoshi)
fig.3-1-3 luxR repression promoter assay (worked by Shohei Kitano & Eriko Uchikoshi)

## plux-CmR

We succeeded in construction and characterization of a NEW Biobrick device of a chloramphenicol resistance (CmR) generator (BBa_K395162) which is activated by LuxR activation promoter. Fig〇〇 shows that in the presence of 3OC6HSL, the device is activated and as a result the cell was able to survive under high chloramphenicol concentration (750 ug/ml). (See more…)

Fig3 Chloramphenicol resistance device. This work done by Yusuke Kaneta

## luxI

We constructed a new LuxI generator (BBa_K395146) and characterized its function. By combining I14032 (PlacIq) and K092400 (rbs-luxI-ter), we constructed K395146. Then we confirmed that the cell with K395146 produced the sufficient amount of 3OC6HSL to activate LuxR activation promoter (R0062) (See more…)

Fig4 LuxI and LuxR activation promoter assay. This work done by Eriko Uchikoshi and Shohei Kitano

## Mathematical modeling

In order to confirm that this system is feasible, we simulated this system. The following figures 〇〇 show the simulation result. We held a series of simulations under several experimental conditions. Fig◯◯〜Fig◯◯ are the results. Fig1 is the case without antibiotic. In this case, cell A and cell B show no difference of growth. Fig2 is the condition with chloramphenicol while Artificial Cooperation System is not working. Graph shows that cellA decrease by chloramphenicol. Fig.3 is the condition with chloramphenicol while Artificial Cooperation System is working. The graph shows turnover of CellA, which means it was rescued by Artificial Cooperation System. Fig4 is the condition with Kanamycin while Artificial Cooperation System is working. This time, number of CellB decrease at first, though recover at the end. From the simulation results above, we can conclude that our system can work under a certain situation.

Fig3-0-2 Simulation result in absence of antibiotics. This work done by Shohei Kitano
Fig3-0-3 Simulation result without Artificial Cooperation System. This work done by Shohei Kitano

Fig3-0-4 Simulation result in the presence of chloramphenicol. This work done by Shohei Kitano
Fog3-0-5 Simulation result in the presence of kanamycin. This work done by Shohei Kitano

# Conclusion

We succeeded in constructing two new BioBrick, LuxR repression promoter (K395008) and chloramphenicol resistance gene generator activated by LuxR and 3OC6HSL. We characterized R0061, R0062 and I14032. From the experimental data and simulation result, we confirmed the feasibility of the Artificial Cooperation System, E. coli with humanity. And we noticed that we can make more interesting E. coli.