Team:Imperial College London/Modelling/Signalling/Results and Conclusion

From 2010.igem.org

Revision as of 21:47, 26 October 2010 by Pete fab (Talk | contribs)

Modelling Overview | Detection Model | Signaling Model | Fast Response Model | Interactions
A major part of the project consisted of modelling each module. This enabled us to decide which ideas we should implement. Look at the Fast Response page for a great example of how modelling has made a major impact on our design!
Objectives | Description | Results | Constants | MATLAB Code
Results and Conclusion
Using this model, we can show that the phosphorylated ComE* is proportional to both initial concentration of AIP and ComD.

If the initial concentration of AIP or ComD is zero, there is no formation of ComE*. We are assuming an initial concentration of Phosphate and ComE of 100nM. If we change either [AIP]0 or [ComE]0, then the final concentration of ComE* will always tend towards 5×10-11M. [ComE*]final will always tend towards this value, unless the initial concentrations of Phosphate and ComE are changed. However, if we increase both [AIP]0 and [ComE]0 at the same time, then [ComE*]final will be reached much faster (i.e. slope increases).

IC Signalling Results1.png
Graph showing how [ComE]final eventually reaches the value 5×10-11M.


IC Signalling Results2.png IC Signalling Results3.png IC Signalling Results4.png
1. Graph showing the production of Pr-ComD complex. 2. Graph showing the production of phosphorylated Pr-ComD* complex. 3. Graph showing the production of Pr-ComD*-ComE complex. Notice the steep increase of concentration for each of these graphs, which could be due to the high k1,2,3,4 values.
Retrieved from "http://2010.igem.org/Team:Imperial_College_London/Modelling/Signalling/Results_and_Conclusion"