Team:Calgary/28 August 2010

From 2010.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
Line 5: Line 5:
[[Image:08.28.2010 Emily MalE RD w LuxO.jpg|400px|thumb|Emily's gel of MalE restriction digest with LuxO for comparison as a control]]
[[Image:08.28.2010 Emily MalE RD w LuxO.jpg|400px|thumb|Emily's gel of MalE restriction digest with LuxO for comparison as a control]]
 +
 +
[[Image:08.28.2010 Emily MalEssdel RD w LuxO.jpg|thumb|Emily's gel of MalE with signal sequence deletion restriction digest and MalE31 with signal sequence deletion using LuxO as a control]]
<u>Emily</u>
<u>Emily</u>

Revision as of 07:04, 29 August 2010

Saturday August 28, 2010

Don't we all love weekends?

Emily's gel of MalE restriction digest with LuxO for comparison as a control
Emily's gel of MalE with signal sequence deletion restriction digest and MalE31 with signal sequence deletion using LuxO as a control

Emily

Today I ran a gel of the digests that I did yesterday. Unfortunately it looks like I was not actually able to get malE into the psB1AK3 Vector. I will go back to the PCR product of this tomorrow. I also ran a gel of my PCR of malESSDel and malE31SSDel. Unfortunately there were no bands, so this will need to be optimized and re-run on Monday. Tonight, I also ran a gel of the malE and malE31 PCR Products. This looked


Chris

Today, I set up a 50 reaction colony PCR of the constructs of CpxP into pSB1AC3, CpxP into pSB1AK3, ibpAB into pSB1AK3 and ibpAB into pSB1AC3 to determine whether or not the part had been correctly inserted yesterday. I also started overnight cultures of the part I0500-I13507 which had been constructed previously. I continued writing the paper which is for our wiki about the stress-response circuits that we have chosen.