"
Team:METU Turkey/Results Discussion/CooA Expression and Purification
From 2010.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
Fundaguzey (Talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 371: | Line 371: | ||
<p style="font-size:110%; color:#576f91; font-family:georgia,serif;"><br> | <p style="font-size:110%; color:#576f91; font-family:georgia,serif;"><br> | ||
| - | <br> 1-Overexpression optimization | + | <br> <h2>1-Overexpression optimization</h2> |
| - | <br> A. Expression vector comparison (pKK versus pTriEx) | + | <br> <h3>A. Expression vector comparison (pKK versus pTriEx)</h3> |
<br>When we compare the below results, the expression of pTriEx vector is higher than the expression of pTriEx vector | <br>When we compare the below results, the expression of pTriEx vector is higher than the expression of pTriEx vector | ||
| - | <br> A.1. Expression in BL21 with pTriEx | + | <br> <h3>A.1. Expression in BL21 with pTriEx</h3> |
<br> In this expression experiment, we obtained 2 different bands in BL21 pTriEx from BL21 negative control as indicated gel photo. CooA is found in two form (monomer and dimer). | <br> In this expression experiment, we obtained 2 different bands in BL21 pTriEx from BL21 negative control as indicated gel photo. CooA is found in two form (monomer and dimer). | ||
| Line 383: | Line 383: | ||
<div align="center" style="margin:15px 0px 0px 0px"><img style="border: 0px solid ; width: 300px; height: 300px;" alt="w7" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/3/35/Br1.jpg"></a></div> | <div align="center" style="margin:15px 0px 0px 0px"><img style="border: 0px solid ; width: 300px; height: 300px;" alt="w7" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/3/35/Br1.jpg"></a></div> | ||
| - | <br> A.2. Expression in JM109 and BL21 with pKK vector | + | <br> <h3>A.2. Expression in JM109 and BL21 with pKK vector</h3> |
We failed to express pKK vector in JM109. We have a little expression in BL21. | We failed to express pKK vector in JM109. We have a little expression in BL21. | ||
| Line 393: | Line 393: | ||
| - | <br> B. Expression host comparison (JM109 versus BL21) | + | <br> <h3>B. Expression host comparison (JM109 versus BL21)</h3> |
<br> BL21 is better host than JM109 for CooA. | <br> BL21 is better host than JM109 for CooA. | ||
| - | <br> C. IPTG induction studies | + | <br> <h3>C. IPTG induction studies</h3> |
<br> Expression comparison with different IPTG Concentration of pTriEx vector. | <br> Expression comparison with different IPTG Concentration of pTriEx vector. | ||
| Line 408: | Line 408: | ||
<br> <html><div><a href="https://2010.igem.org/Team:METU_Turkey/Results_Discussion/IPTG_induction"><strong>Details...</strong></a></div></html> | <br> <html><div><a href="https://2010.igem.org/Team:METU_Turkey/Results_Discussion/IPTG_induction"><strong>Details...</strong></a></div></html> | ||
| - | <br> D. Ferric Citrate effect | + | <br> <h3>D. Ferric Citrate effect</h3> |
<br> Time Dependent Expression of pTriEx vector with Ferric Citrate and without Ferric Citrate | <br> Time Dependent Expression of pTriEx vector with Ferric Citrate and without Ferric Citrate | ||
| Line 419: | Line 419: | ||
<br> <html><div><a href="https://2010.igem.org/Team:METU_Turkey/Results_Discussion/Ferric_Citrate_effect"><strong>Details...</strong></a></div></html> | <br> <html><div><a href="https://2010.igem.org/Team:METU_Turkey/Results_Discussion/Ferric_Citrate_effect"><strong>Details...</strong></a></div></html> | ||
| - | <br> E. Soluble versus insoluble fraction | + | <br> <h3>E. Soluble versus insoluble fraction</h3> |
<br> Lysis Buffer with Urea and without Urea | <br> Lysis Buffer with Urea and without Urea | ||
| Line 430: | Line 430: | ||
<br> <html><div><a href="https://2010.igem.org/Team:METU_Turkey/Results_Discussion/Soluble_vs_insoluble_fraction"><strong>Details...</strong></a></div></html> | <br> <html><div><a href="https://2010.igem.org/Team:METU_Turkey/Results_Discussion/Soluble_vs_insoluble_fraction"><strong>Details...</strong></a></div></html> | ||
| - | <br> 2-Purification optimization | + | <br> <h2>2-Purification optimization</h2> |
| - | <br> A. Ion exchange chromatography with Sepharose Q (QS) | + | <br> <h3>A. Ion exchange chromatography with Sepharose Q (QS)</h3> |
<br> Purification QS with BL21 pTriEx: Yellowish color indicates our CooA protein. Then we looaded 27,28,29,30 and 31 to SDS-Gel the elutes which have a high value at 420nm because oxidized CooA gives a Sorret peak at 420 nm according to Aono. CooA concentration was determined according to extinction coefficient of heme (Ferric State) which is 108 mM-1 cm-1 according to Aono. The SDS gel indicates that our protein is colose to 50 kDa in dimer. MW of monomer is estimated 24-25kDa according to Aono. | <br> Purification QS with BL21 pTriEx: Yellowish color indicates our CooA protein. Then we looaded 27,28,29,30 and 31 to SDS-Gel the elutes which have a high value at 420nm because oxidized CooA gives a Sorret peak at 420 nm according to Aono. CooA concentration was determined according to extinction coefficient of heme (Ferric State) which is 108 mM-1 cm-1 according to Aono. The SDS gel indicates that our protein is colose to 50 kDa in dimer. MW of monomer is estimated 24-25kDa according to Aono. | ||
| Line 448: | Line 448: | ||
<div align="center" style="margin:15px 0px 0px 0px"><img style="border: 0px solid ; width: 300px; height: 300px;" alt="w7" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/9/93/Br14.jpg"></a></div></html> | <div align="center" style="margin:15px 0px 0px 0px"><img style="border: 0px solid ; width: 300px; height: 300px;" alt="w7" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/9/93/Br14.jpg"></a></div></html> | ||
| - | <br> B. Affinity chromatography with chealating sepharose(CS) | + | <br> <h3>B. Affinity chromatography with chealating sepharose(CS)</h3> |
<br> Purification with CS BL21 pTriEx: Loaded combined FPLC tubes from QS column(10/09/26) gave two close picks in CS column. First one corresponds to the CooA. The elutions of CooA are C13,C14 and C15. We combined them for further analyzes with EMSA and ITC and stored @+4. C16 AND C17 are combined to reload to CS column because they are contaminated another protein which is close to 40kDa. | <br> Purification with CS BL21 pTriEx: Loaded combined FPLC tubes from QS column(10/09/26) gave two close picks in CS column. First one corresponds to the CooA. The elutions of CooA are C13,C14 and C15. We combined them for further analyzes with EMSA and ITC and stored @+4. C16 AND C17 are combined to reload to CS column because they are contaminated another protein which is close to 40kDa. | ||
| Line 462: | Line 462: | ||
| - | <br> C. Concentrated CooA | + | <br> <h2>C. Concentrated CooA</h2> |
<br> CooA protein contains heme group therefore its solution is seen yellow to orange | <br> CooA protein contains heme group therefore its solution is seen yellow to orange | ||
Revision as of 03:05, 28 October 2010
3-CooA Expression and Purification
|
1-Overexpression optimizationA. Expression vector comparison (pKK versus pTriEx)When we compare the below results, the expression of pTriEx vector is higher than the expression of pTriEx vector A.1. Expression in BL21 with pTriExIn this expression experiment, we obtained 2 different bands in BL21 pTriEx from BL21 negative control as indicated gel photo. CooA is found in two form (monomer and dimer).  A.2. Expression in JM109 and BL21 with pKK vectorWe failed to express pKK vector in JM109. We have a little expression in BL21.
B. Expression host comparison (JM109 versus BL21)
C. IPTG induction studies
D. Ferric Citrate effect
E. Soluble versus insoluble fraction
2-Purification optimizationA. Ion exchange chromatography with Sepharose Q (QS)
 B. Affinity chromatography with chealating sepharose(CS)
C. Concentrated CooA
 |
