Team:METU Turkey/Results Discussion/CooA Expression and Purification
From 2010.igem.org
(One intermediate revision not shown) | |||
Line 356: | Line 356: | ||
</ul><!--topnav ends--> | </ul><!--topnav ends--> | ||
</div><!--tab_nav ends--> | </div><!--tab_nav ends--> | ||
- | + | <br> -- </br> | |
<!-- ***** New entry ***** --> | <!-- ***** New entry ***** --> | ||
Line 381: | Line 381: | ||
<br> In this expression experiment, we obtained 2 different bands in BL21 pTriEx from BL21 negative control as indicated gel photo. CooA is found in two form (monomer and dimer). | <br> In this expression experiment, we obtained 2 different bands in BL21 pTriEx from BL21 negative control as indicated gel photo. CooA is found in two form (monomer and dimer). | ||
- | <div align="center" style="margin:15px 0px 0px 0px"><img style="border: 0px solid ; width: | + | <div align="center" style="margin:15px 0px 0px 0px"><img style="border: 0px solid ; width: 400px; height: 400px;" alt="w7" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/3/35/Br1.jpg"></a></div> |
<br> <h3>A.2. Expression in JM109 and BL21 with pKK vector</h3> | <br> <h3>A.2. Expression in JM109 and BL21 with pKK vector</h3> | ||
Line 387: | Line 387: | ||
We failed to express pKK vector in JM109. We have a little expression in BL21. | We failed to express pKK vector in JM109. We have a little expression in BL21. | ||
- | <div align="center" style="margin:15px 0px 0px 0px"><img style="border: 0px solid ; width: | + | <div align="center" style="margin:15px 0px 0px 0px"><img style="border: 0px solid ; width: 400px; height: 400px;" alt="w7" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/b/b9/Br2.jpg"></a></div> |
<br> <html><div><a href="https://2010.igem.org/Team:METU_Turkey/Results_Discussion/pKK_versus_pTriEx"><strong>Details...</strong></a></div></html> | <br> <html><div><a href="https://2010.igem.org/Team:METU_Turkey/Results_Discussion/pKK_versus_pTriEx"><strong>Details...</strong></a></div></html> | ||
Line 402: | Line 402: | ||
<html> | <html> | ||
- | <div align="center" style="margin:15px 0px 0px 0px"><img style="border: 0px solid ; width: | + | <div align="center" style="margin:15px 0px 0px 0px"><img style="border: 0px solid ; width: 400px; height: 400px;" alt="w7" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/6/6a/Br3.jpg"></a></div></html> |
<br> Our CooA pTriEx vector is expressed without IPTG induction but is less than others. When 2mM IPTG was added to culture, expression of CooA was decreased. It has probably a toxic effect on our bacteria. | <br> Our CooA pTriEx vector is expressed without IPTG induction but is less than others. When 2mM IPTG was added to culture, expression of CooA was decreased. It has probably a toxic effect on our bacteria. | ||
Line 413: | Line 413: | ||
<html> | <html> | ||
- | <div align="center" style="margin:15px 0px 0px 0px"><img style="border: 0px solid ; width: | + | <div align="center" style="margin:15px 0px 0px 0px"><img style="border: 0px solid ; width: 400px; height: 400px;" alt="w7" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/5/5f/Br4.jpg"></a></div></html> |
<br> According to the SDS-Page result, Ferric Citrate increses the expression of CooA. It is probably releated to heme characteristic of CooA. The best IPTG induction time among 3-5-7-9 hours is 5 hour. | <br> According to the SDS-Page result, Ferric Citrate increses the expression of CooA. It is probably releated to heme characteristic of CooA. The best IPTG induction time among 3-5-7-9 hours is 5 hour. | ||
Line 424: | Line 424: | ||
<html> | <html> | ||
- | <div align="center" style="margin:15px 0px 0px 0px"><img style="border: 0px solid ; width: | + | <div align="center" style="margin:15px 0px 0px 0px"><img style="border: 0px solid ; width: 400px; height: 400px;" alt="w7" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/4/43/Br5.jpg"></a></div></html> |
<br> Results are seen in the SDS-Page photograph, there is no difference between bands of same samples (look at all the 50kDa bands). Thus,we concluded that CooA does not accumulate in inclusion body. | <br> Results are seen in the SDS-Page photograph, there is no difference between bands of same samples (look at all the 50kDa bands). Thus,we concluded that CooA does not accumulate in inclusion body. | ||
Line 440: | Line 440: | ||
<html> | <html> | ||
- | <div align="center" style="margin:15px 0px 0px 0px"><img style="border: 0px solid ; width: | + | <div align="center" style="margin:15px 0px 0px 0px"><img style="border: 0px solid ; width: 400px; height: 400px;" alt="w7" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/1/14/Br13.jpg"></a></div></html> |
<html> | <html> | ||
- | <div align="center" style="margin:15px 0px 0px 0px"><img style="border: 0px solid ; width: | + | <div align="center" style="margin:15px 0px 0px 0px"><img style="border: 0px solid ; width: 400px; height: 400px;" alt="w7" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/7/76/B30.jpg"></a></div></html> |
<html> | <html> | ||
- | <div align="center" style="margin:15px 0px 0px 0px"><img style="border: 0px solid ; width: | + | <div align="center" style="margin:15px 0px 0px 0px"><img style="border: 0px solid ; width: 400px; height: 400px;" alt="w7" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/9/93/Br14.jpg"></a></div></html> |
<br> <h3>B. Affinity chromatography with chealating sepharose(CS)</h3> | <br> <h3>B. Affinity chromatography with chealating sepharose(CS)</h3> | ||
Line 456: | Line 456: | ||
<html> | <html> | ||
- | <div align="center" style="margin:15px 0px 0px 0px"><img style="border: 0px solid ; width: | + | <div align="center" style="margin:15px 0px 0px 0px"><img style="border: 0px solid ; width: 400px; height: 400px;" alt="w7" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/7/74/Br15.jpg"></a></div></html> |
<html> | <html> | ||
- | <div align="center" style="margin:15px 0px 0px 0px"><img style="border: 0px solid ; width: | + | <div align="center" style="margin:15px 0px 0px 0px"><img style="border: 0px solid ; width: 400px; height: 400px;" alt="w7" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/d/d8/Br16.jpg"></a></div></html> |
Line 467: | Line 467: | ||
<html> | <html> | ||
- | <div align="center" style="margin:15px 0px 0px 0px"><img style="border: 0px solid ; width: | + | <div align="center" style="margin:15px 0px 0px 0px"><img style="border: 0px solid ; width: 400px; height: 400px;" alt="w7" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/b/be/Br18.jpg"></a></div></html> |
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | <br> -- </br> |
Latest revision as of 03:39, 28 October 2010
--
3-CooA Expression and Purification
1-Overexpression optimizationA. Expression vector comparison (pKK versus pTriEx)When we compare the below results, the expression of pTriEx vector is higher than the expression of pTriEx vector A.1. Expression in BL21 with pTriExIn this expression experiment, we obtained 2 different bands in BL21 pTriEx from BL21 negative control as indicated gel photo. CooA is found in two form (monomer and dimer). A.2. Expression in JM109 and BL21 with pKK vectorWe failed to express pKK vector in JM109. We have a little expression in BL21.
B. Expression host comparison (JM109 versus BL21)
C. IPTG induction studies
D. Ferric Citrate effect
E. Soluble versus insoluble fraction
2-Purification optimizationA. Ion exchange chromatography with Sepharose Q (QS)
B. Affinity chromatography with chealating sepharose(CS)
C. Concentrated CooA
|