Team:Washington/Gram Positive/Test

From 2010.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
Line 51: Line 51:
==Catalytic Residue knock-outs show that capD_cp is catalyzing the reaction as expected==
==Catalytic Residue knock-outs show that capD_cp is catalyzing the reaction as expected==
-
Before we can predict which mutations increase hydrolysis capability, we need to validate that the circularly permuted version of CapD has measurable activity for further assessments. We also hypothesize a threonine residue in the catalytic site of CapD_CP plays an important role in the catalysis reaction and mutating it will eliminate all enzymatic activity. Thus we created two mutants, T2V and T2A, to act as negative controls. The result (figure 1 below) of this assay confirms our hypothesis that CapD_CP has enzymatic activity to the two catalytic knockouts. The relatively flat activity curves of the knockout mutants confirm the hypothesis of the threonine's role in the catalytic site.  
+
Before we could predict which mutations increase hydrolysis capability, we needed to validate that the circularly permuted version of CapD had measurable activity for further assessments. We also hypothesize a threonine residue in the catalytic site of CapD_CP plays an important role in the catalysis reaction and mutating it will eliminate all enzymatic activity. Thus we created two mutants, T2V and T2A, to act as negative controls. The result (figure 1 below) of this assay confirms our hypothesis that CapD_CP has enzymatic activity to the two catalytic knockouts. The relatively flat activity curves of the knockout mutants confirm the hypothesis of the threonine's role in the catalytic site.  
[[Image:Washington_Confirming_CP_activity_revised6.jpg|thumb|750px|left|Figure 1: Confirming the activity of CapD_CP by comparing it to two CapD_CP knockouts, T2A and T2V.different graphic is coming]]
[[Image:Washington_Confirming_CP_activity_revised6.jpg|thumb|750px|left|Figure 1: Confirming the activity of CapD_CP by comparing it to two CapD_CP knockouts, T2A and T2V.different graphic is coming]]

Revision as of 04:15, 9 October 2010

More descriptive titles, verification that your CapD_CP was a monomer ( gel) should go before testing catalytic ability

Contents

Construction of CapD_CP

CapD_CP runs on a gel as one clean band

Depicted in Figure X is a gel comparing purified capD and capD_cp. This demonstrates one of the major advantages of CapD_CP, in addition to the fact that it is easy to express, it comes out in 1 clean band and is easy to quantify. CapD shows three bands, while the lower two bands are the expected pieces that occur after the enzyme undergoes self cleavage, the upper band is of unclear origin. It's mass corresponds to what would either be the unprocessed, inactive, monomeric form of the enzymes or the dimeric form that didn't denature. This ambiguity makes the amount of active enzyme from capD difficult to quantify.

Figure 1. CapD_CP as expected. Right: CapD has ambiguous bands, making quantifying difficult and assaying protein activity less accurate



CapD_CP is expressed at EXACTLY the correct molecular wieght

In Figure X we show the mass spec conformation of the molecular wieght of capD_cp. As expected the N-terminal methionine is cleaved off by the native E. coli methionine aminopeptidase, resulting in a high level of pure active enzyme.


Figure 2. Expected weight of CapD_CP without Methionine=55285Da, with Methionine=55417Da. Our mass spec detected a peak at 55274.8Da (no Methionine) well within the 0.02% error limit for our mass spec


The circular permutation didn't result in a loss of activity

In Table X we show the kinetic paramters for capD and capD_cp as determined using our enzyme assay. Due to the heterogenous mix of active (processed) and inactive (unprocessed) protein, the kcat is difficult to quantify. The data we obtained suggests that the kinetic parameters of capD and capD_CP are within error of each other. Therefore the circular permutation of capD did not have a negative effect on catalytic actiivty, suggesting that autoprocessing is not required for catalysis but simply a regulatory feature.

Kinetic properties determined for a Michaelis-Menton profile of capD_cp and capD, as described in our enzyme assay protocols section.



Catalytic Residue knock-outs show that capD_cp is catalyzing the reaction as expected

Before we could predict which mutations increase hydrolysis capability, we needed to validate that the circularly permuted version of CapD had measurable activity for further assessments. We also hypothesize a threonine residue in the catalytic site of CapD_CP plays an important role in the catalysis reaction and mutating it will eliminate all enzymatic activity. Thus we created two mutants, T2V and T2A, to act as negative controls. The result (figure 1 below) of this assay confirms our hypothesis that CapD_CP has enzymatic activity to the two catalytic knockouts. The relatively flat activity curves of the knockout mutants confirm the hypothesis of the threonine's role in the catalytic site.

Figure 1: Confirming the activity of CapD_CP by comparing it to two CapD_CP knockouts, T2A and T2V.different graphic is coming


Designing CapD_CP to be a better Hydrolase

Screening Mutant Libraries

By standardizing the activity slope of each design relative to CapD_CP, a scatterplot easily portrays the qualities of each mutant. Several designs show negative catalytic curves similar to the catalytic knockouts. Some immediately show a negative activity curve meaning decrease in transpeptidation, hydrolysis, or both. T20S is a promising mutant hydrolase design.

Washington Mutant design.jpg


Characterization of best hits

blah blah blah



Building the Gram(+) Therapeutic       Overview of Gram(-) Therapeutic