Team:UCL London/Doxycycline
From 2010.igem.org
(→Doxycycline Economic Analysis) |
|||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
=Doxycycline Economic Analysis= | =Doxycycline Economic Analysis= | ||
+ | ==Doxycycline Process Flowsheet== | ||
Estimate of Doxycycline cost for an industrial scale fermentation - say 1,000L | Estimate of Doxycycline cost for an industrial scale fermentation - say 1,000L | ||
Line 17: | Line 18: | ||
12 (gram/batch) * 32.20 ($ / gram) = $386.40 per a 1,000 batch | 12 (gram/batch) * 32.20 ($ / gram) = $386.40 per a 1,000 batch | ||
+ | [[Image:Ucl-doxylcien.png|800px|left]] | ||
==Mammalian cell process using Doxycline== | ==Mammalian cell process using Doxycline== | ||
Line 323: | Line 325: | ||
|} | |} | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
Revision as of 14:06, 27 October 2010
Doxycycline Economic Analysis
Doxycycline Process Flowsheet
Estimate of Doxycycline cost for an industrial scale fermentation - say 1,000L
I looked on Sigma Aldrich website for Doxycycline hyclate cost
• $ 32.20
• For 1 gram of Doxycycline
Finally for a 1,000 L fermentation batch, this is how much Doxycycline you need: 0.012 kg per 1,000 L batch
Cost of Doxycycline per a batch: 12 (gram/batch) * 32.20 ($ / gram) = $386.40 per a 1,000 batch
Mammalian cell process using Doxycline
Production Volume (L) | Titre (g/L) | Product Generated (kg/batch) | Annual Production (kg/yr) | Batches (per a year) | Centrifugation Yield (%) | Filtration Yield (%) | Purification Yield (%) | Overall Yield (%) | No. Bioreactors | Scale of Bioreactors (L) |
40,000 | 2 | 6.3 | 132.4 | 21 | 94 | 100 | 70 | 67 | 1 | 7000 |
Note: 7,000 L fermenter example
Executive Summary
Capital Investment ($) | 42,013,000 |
Operating Costs ($/yr) | 16,210,726 |
Product Unit Cost ($/kg) | 122,475 |
Labour Cost ($/yr) | 1,805,307 |
After removing Doxycline from the production process
' | Before | After |
Capital Investment ($) | 42,013,000 | 41,820,000 |
Operating costs ($/yr) | 16,210,726 | 16,153,925 |
Cogs ($/g) | 122.5 | 122.1 |
Annual Operating Cost
Annual Operating Cost | ' | ' |
Cost Item | $ | % |
Raw Materials | 5,477,726 | 34 |
Labour-Dependent | 1,805,000 | 11 |
Facility-Dependent | 6,050,000 | 37 |
Laboratory/QC/QA | 903,000 | 6 |
Consumables | 1,966,000 | 12 |
Wste Treatment/Disposable | 6,000 | 0.0 |
Utilities | 3,000 | 0.0 |
Total | 16,210,726 | 100 |
Cogs ($/g) | 122.47 | |
Could this be because of Doxycline? No, doxycline makes up only 1% of the total raw material costs
Material Cost
Material Costs | Unit Cost ($/kg) | Annual Amount (kg) | Annual Cost ($) | % |
Media | 300 | 16 | 4,860 | 0.088722951 |
SerumFree Media | 300 | 17,184 | 5,155,169 | 94.11148327 |
Doxycline | 32200 | 1.764 | 56,801 | 1.03694128 |
Water | 0 | 335 | 0 | 0 |
WFI | 0.15 | 517,650 | 77,647 | 1.417504323 |
Air | 0 | 88,694 | 0 | 0 |
H3PO4 (5% w/w) | 0.14 | 121,071 | 17,253 | 0.314966478 |
NaOH (0.5M) | 0.25 | 99,042 | 24,271 | 0.44308534 |
Protein A Equil | 0.15 | 144,251 | 22,063 | 0.402776641 |
Protein A Eluti | 0.15 | 65,347 | 10,029 | 0.18308693 |
Prot- A Reg Buffer | 0.17 | 39,230 | 6,580 | 0.120122844 |
NaOH (0.1M) | 0.24 | 135,799 | 33,015 | 0.60271363 |
IEX -Eq-Buffer | 0.19 | 21,491 | 4,000 | 0.073023005 |
IEX-Wash-Buffer | 0.22 | 21,586 | 4,766 | 0.087006911 |
IEX-El-Buffer | 0.35 | 1,217 | 423 | 0.007722183 |
NaCl (1M) | 0.37 | 13,196 | 4,860 | 0.088722951 |
Amm. Sulfate | 8 | 919 | 7,354 | 0.134252795 |
HIC-Eq-Buffer | 0.91 | 8,522 | 7,744 | 0.141372538 |
HIC-Wash-Buffer | 0.54 | 20,256 | 10,898 | 0.198951178 |
HIC-El-Buffer | 0.31 | 19,645 | 5,985 | 0.109260672 |
NaOH (1M) | 0.34 | 65,709 | 22,094 | 0.40334257 |
PBS | 0.18 | 15,255 | 1,913 | 0.034923252 |
Polysorbate 80 | 1.83 | 1 | 1 | 1.82558E-05 |
Total | - | 5,477,726 | 100 | |
Consumable Costs
Consumable Costs | Unit Cost ($) | Annual Amount | Annual Cost ($) |
Dft DEF Cartridge | 1,000 | 63 | 63,000 |
Dft Membrane | 400 | 10 m2 | 4,008 |
50 L Bag | 5 | 210 | 1,050 |
Viral Exclusion Membrane | 13,356 | 21 | 280,476 |
Protein A | 6,000 | 167 L | 1,000,337 |
SP-Sepharose High Performance | 1,200 | 98 L | 117,915 |
HIC Butyl Sepharose High Performance | 2,050 | 9 L | 18,332 |
Total | - | - | 1,485,118 |
Equipment Cost $
Doxycline is added from a holding tank, absence of doxycline will make minimal difference to USP costs.
DSP costs are very high, that a cost reduction in the USP section has no significant difference to the total equipment costs
USP | DSP | Total Cost | USP:DSP |
732,000 | 2,607,000 | 3,339,000 | 0.28 |
USP | ' | ' |
Equipment Name | Cost ($) | |
Stirred tank reactor | 539,000 | |
Blending Tank | 193,000 | |
DSP | ||
Blending Tank | 191,000 | |
Blending Tank | 159,000 | |
Diafilter | 26,000 | |
Chromatography Column | 148,000 | |
Blending Tank | 137,000 | |
Chromatography Column | 144,000 | |
Dead-End Filter | 32,000 | |
Blending Tank | 134,000 | |
Diafilter | 22,000 | |
Dead-End Filter | 32,000 | |
Disposable Container-Skid | 0 | |
Disk-Stack Centrifuge | 370,000 | Most expensive piece of equipment downstream |
Dead-End Filter | 32,000 | |
Chromatography Column | 192,000 | |
Dead-End Filter | 32,000 | |
Blending Tank | 134,000 | |
Dead-End Filter | 32,000 | |
Blending Tank | 127,000 | |
Dead-End Filter | 32,000 | |
Unlisted Equipment | 677,000 | |
Total | 3,385,000 | |
Waste Treatment/Disposal Cost
Waste disposal costs are mainly for CEX and HIC
Waste Category | Unit Cost ($/kg) | Annual Amount (kg) | Annual Cost ($) | % |
Solid Waste | - | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Aqueous Liquid | - | 156,691 | 6,268 | 100 |
IEX - Waste | 0.04 | 87,190 | 3,488 | 55.64 |
HIC- Waste | 0.04 | 69,500 | 2,780 | 44.36 |
Organic Liquid | - | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Emissions | - | 88,584 | 0 | 0 |
Total | - | 245,275 | 6,268 | 100 |
Throughput Analysis
On SuperPro it assumes it would take 60 minutes to set up the Doxycline inlet This is 0.3 % of the overall process, delay in set up doesn't have a profound effect.
Process Data | ' | ' |
Annual Operating time | 7,104.66 | Hours |
Annual Throughput | 132.36 | Kg/MP |
Batch Throughput | 6.3 | Kg/MP |
Plant Batch Time | 397.49 | Hours |
Number of Batches per a year | 21 | Batches |
Time Bottleneck Equipment | Production Fermenter | PBR1 |
Throughput Utilization | 90 | % |