"
Team:Edinburgh/Bacterial/Green light producer
From 2010.igem.org
| Line 164: | Line 164: | ||
<a name="Strategy" id="Strategy"></a><h2>Strategy</h2> | <a name="Strategy" id="Strategy"></a><h2>Strategy</h2> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
| - | <p> | + | <p>The wild type version of the luciferase was cloned into pSB1C3. The 6 extra bases between the start codon and the start codon were removed by PCR, using a forward primer starting at the start codon, and an RBS based reverse primer. The part and the vector were thus amplified, but without the 6 extra bases.</p> |
| + | <br> | ||
| + | <p>The codon optimised LUCIE luciferase was synthesised by Geneart, then transferred to pSB1C3. | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
Revision as of 20:23, 27 October 2010
Overview: The green light producer
For the production of green light, we relied on tried and trusted firefly luciferase from P. pyralis. This has a recorded luminescence emission peak of roughly 557nm, as recorded in Shapiro et al. (2009) and other references (Figure 1). This part was originally submitted by Ljubljana 2007. The sequence analysis revealed that there were 6 bases inserted upstream of the coding sequence. The distance between the ribosome binding site and the start codon was thus not optimal, and this resulted in a decreased luminescence intensity of the cells. We removed these 6 bases by PCR and resubmitted the part in pSB1C3.
Figure 1: Emission spectra of the P. pyralis luciferase (in solid black line).
Image: Shapiro et al. (2009)
An alternative approach was planned during the early stages of the project: The combination of LuxAB with another protein: YFP from Vibrio fischeri. This will shift the wavelength produced by LuxAB towards the green regions of the spectrum, to activate our green light sensor. During our discussions with UNAM-Genomics Mexico we realised that they planned on making the same part, so we stopped working on it, planning on testing its combination with our green light sensor later on. We unfortunately did not have time to get to that stage. It is available in the registry as BBa_K360010.
LUCIE: A brighter luciferase
In addition to the above, we created a codon-optimised mutant of the firefly luciferase, reported by Fujii et al. (2007) to be 12.5 times brighter than the wildtype. This may help to alleviate the problems foreseen with a lack of luminescence intensity failing to activate the light sensors of the corresponding wavelength.
LUCIE (LUCiferase with Intense Emission) has three mutations compared to the wild type: Ile423Leu, Asp436Gly, and Leu530Arg. This causes more efficient binding of ATP and luciferin. These are used up faster, resulting in increased brightness of the cells.
Strategy
The wild type version of the luciferase was cloned into pSB1C3. The 6 extra bases between the start codon and the start codon were removed by PCR, using a forward primer starting at the start codon, and an RBS based reverse primer. The part and the vector were thus amplified, but without the 6 extra bases.
The codon optimised LUCIE luciferase was synthesised by Geneart, then transferred to pSB1C3.
Problems
***
BioBricks
Firefly luciferase was originally deposited in the Registry by Ljubljana 2007. We modified this slightly and re-submitted in pSB1C3, along with a codon-optimised mutant and a simple reporter system.
BBa_K322237: firefly luciferase from Photinus pyralis, modified BBa_I712019.
BBa_K322238: firefly luciferase from Photinus pyralis under lac promoter.
BBa_K322451: firefly luciferase from Photinus pyralis, codon optimised and mutated for brighter bioluminescence.
Characterisation
Figure 2: Results of spectrum analysis of our wildtype firefly luciferase.
Figure 2 shows the results of the spectral analysis of our wildtype firefly luciferase BBa_K322237. Unlike the emission spectrum for our red-light producing S248T variant, the spectrum differs greatly from the expected; there is a small peak at roughly the correct location (557nm), but also a shoulder at approximately 580nm and a further peak at 600nm. Given that the difference between the aforementioned mutant and this wildtype is very noticeable to the naked eye, it is difficult to pinpoint the cause of this discrepancy; we hope to be able to re-run the analysis in an attempt to make sense of it.
References
Fujii, H., Noda, K., Asami, Y., Kuroda, A., Sakata, M. & Tokida, A. (2007). Increase in bioluminescence intensity of firefly luciferase using genetic modification. Analytical Biochemistry 366, 131-136.
Shapirol, E., Lu, C., Baneyx, F. (2009). Design and characterization of novel trypsin-resistant firefly luciferases by site-directed mutagenesis. Protein Eng Des Sel 22(11): 655-663.
Ljubljana 2007 team wiki, http://parts.mit.edu/igem07/index.php/Ljubljana.
