Team:TU Delft/EPAC

From 2010.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)

Revision as of 16:40, 27 October 2010

The EPAC Pyramid

Introduction

When new technologies are presented to society, responses of the public are hard to predict. In the case of synthetic biology numerous questions rise about safety, security and ethics. Also issues like patenting versus open-source models are a topic of debate. During our iGEM project we tried to analyze, assess and improve the relationship between society and synthetic biology.

With our new approach, our team hopes to improve the way in which synthetic biology meets the expectations and needs of society.

Inspiration

For our Human Practice project we got inspired by a 2-year European Project called SYNBIOSAFE (1). SYNBIOSAFE was the first project in Europe to research the safety and ethical aspects of synthetic biology, aiming to proactively stimulate a debate on the following issues: safety, security, ethics and the boundary between science and society.

Based on this project, we developed a complete new approach to human practice: The EPAC pyramid. Our model consists out of four elements: Education, Perception, Awareness & Collaboration. These fundamentals formed the basis for organizing our activities. Because these elements are strongly related to each other we linked them together: the pyramid was born.

EPAC

Using our unique and holistic EPAC approach, we could really focus on the different disciplinaries involving human practice and help society to consider, guide and address the impacts of ongoing advances in synthetic biology.

This is how it works

Working with the model makes it important to first distinguish two information streams. Information can be received and distributed (figure 1).

Depending on the general public opinion and awareness, scientist can provide the right information to inform about science & technology. People recieve this information and process this according to their own values and standards. After processing this information, people will be better able to join the discussion on science & technology.

In our point of view we are at the interface between science and society. We can receive from and spread information to both sides.

By providing information we aim to make people aware or more educated in the field of synthetic biology. The direct consequence of processing this information leads to the formation of perception. These opinions are not only based on the newly absorbed information, but also on norms, values, upbringing and education of the recipient.

Therefore it is imposible to look at education, perception and awareness as separate element. There is a continuous exchange between these streams of communication.

We used the principle of the adressing two of this three elements in all of our activities and thereby maintaining the connection between the elements.

The C in EPAC

The C in EPAC comes from collaboration. Without cooperation, all of the above is not possible.

Click on the icons on the EPAC-pyramid to check our human practice activities.

References

Ganguli-Mitra, A., M. Schmidt, et al. (2009). Of Newtons and heretics. Nat Biotechnol 27(4): 321-322.
Schmidt, M., A. Ganguli-Mitra, et al. (2009). A priority paper for the societal and ethical aspects of synthetic biology. Syst Synth Biol 3(1-4): 3-7.
Schmidt, M., H. Torgersen, et al. (2008). SYNBIOSAFE e-conference: online community discussion on the societal aspects of synthetic biology. Syst Synth Biol 2(1-2): 7-17.

@@ Line 6: / Line 6: @@
 When new technologies are presented to society, responses of the public are hard to predict. In the case of synthetic biology numerous questions rise about safety, security and ethics. Also issues like patenting versus open-source models are a topic of debate. During our iGEM project we tried to analyze, assess and improve the relationship between society and synthetic biology.
-With our new approach, our team hopes to improve the way in which synthetic biology meets the expectations and needs of society. We got inspired by a 2-year European Project called SYNBIOSAFE (1). The paper that resulted from this project was based on an extensive literature search, interviews with scientists, social scientists, civil societies (2), a 4 week long public e-forum (3), and consultation with several stakeholders (1). In a reflection of the outcome of SYNBIOSAFE, the following societal topics were highlighted: safety, security, ethics and the boundary between science and society.
+With our new approach, our team hopes to improve the way in which synthetic biology meets the expectations and needs of society.
-Looking at these topics we came up with a holistic approach for our human practice in order to reach all stakeholders and stimulate engagement in the continuous dialogue in the field of synthetic biology.
+===Inspiration===
-Perceptions from different parties on safety, security and ethics were observer to get a clear picture of the opinions that are present among general public as well as experts. Opinions can be very different when there is a difference in knowledge. Based on multi-stakeholder perceptions one can start looking for ways to provide information. To disseminate information on two levels. In the first place you can make people aware of synthetic biology. One step further, one can use an educational program. Communication at the interface between science and society makes it important to choose a combination between receiving information and disseminating information. That way we can make the following combinations: education, perception & awareness, perception
+For our Human Practice project we got inspired by a 2-year European Project called SYNBIOSAFE (1).
+SYNBIOSAFE was the first project in Europe to research the safety and ethical aspects of synthetic biology, aiming to proactively stimulate a debate on the following issues: '''safety''', '''security''', '''ethics''' and the '''boundary between science and society'''.
-This is how the EPAC pyramid came to existence.
+Based on this project, we developed a complete new approach to human practice: The EPAC pyramid. Our model consists out of four elements: '''E'''ducation, '''P'''erception, '''A'''wareness & '''C'''ollaboration. These fundamentals formed the basis for organizing our activities. Because these elements are strongly related to each other we linked them together: the pyramid was born.
-With this model we imply various ways to equip society with the right information to make sure that one is able to form a proper perception that has value in the ongoing discussion.
-===The EPAC Pyramid - a new approach to Human Practice===
+===EPAC===
+Using our unique and holistic EPAC approach, we could really focus on the different disciplinaries involving human practice and help society to consider, guide and address the impacts of ongoing advances in synthetic biology.
-When new technologies are presented to society, the reaction of the public is hard to predict. In the case of synthetic biology numerous questions raises about biosafety and biosecurity. Also issues like pattenting in contrast to open-source models are a topic of debate.
+===This is how it works===
-During our iGEM project we tried to analyze, assess and improve the relationship between society and synthetic biology. By doing so, our team hopes to improve the way in which synthetic biology meets the expectations and needs of society.
+Working with the model makes it important to first distinguish two information streams. Information can be received and distributed (figure 1).
-To accomplish this goal we chose an holistic approach to Human Practice. Our approach implies various ways to equip sociaty with the right information in order to make sure that one is able to form a proper opinion. This way one can contribute to the public debate.
 [[Image:TU Delft Flowchart for EPAC.jpg|400px|center|thumb|Depending on the general public opinion and awareness, scientist can provide the right information to inform about science & technology. People recieve this information and process this according to their own values and standards. After processing this information, people will be better able to join the discussion on science & technology.]]
-To grasp the muliple aspects of this holistic approach, we come up with a model that provides us the right guide lines to organize our human practise activities - The EPAC Pyramid was created.
+In our point of view we are at the interface between science and society. We can receive from and spread information to both sides.
+By providing information we aim to make people aware or more educated in the field of synthetic biology.
+The direct consequence of processing this information leads to the formation of perception. These opinions are not only based on the newly absorbed information, but also on norms, values, upbringing and education of the recipient.
+Therefore it is imposible to look at education, perception and awareness as separate element. There is a continuous exchange between these streams of communication.
+We used the principle of the adressing two of this three elements in all of our activities and thereby maintaining the connection between the elements.
+===The C in EPAC===
+The C in EPAC comes from collaboration. Without cooperation, all of the above is not possible.
+Click on the icons on the EPAC-pyramid to check our human practice activities.
 <html><center><div style="text-align:center; width:608px; margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto;">