"
Team:Edinburgh/Human
From 2010.igem.org
| Line 197: | Line 197: | ||
<center><a href="#top" class="dir"><img width="100" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/9/9f/Ed10-RTT.png"></a></center> | <center><a href="#top" class="dir"><img width="100" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/9/9f/Ed10-RTT.png"></a></center> | ||
| + | |||
| + | </div> | ||
| + | |||
| + | <div id="windowbox" style="border: .2em solid #660000; padding: 5px; position:fixed; top:50%; right:30px; width:8%;"> | ||
| + | <span style="color:ivory;">Throughout this wiki there are words in <b>bold</b> that indicate a relevance to <b>human aspects</b>. It will become obvious that <b>human aspects</b> are a part of almost everything in <b>iGEM</b>.</span> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Revision as of 21:56, 24 October 2010
Human BRIDGEs
|
What happens within the iGEM competition that doesn't involve humans? Very little is my answer. Therefore, what has relevance to human aspects? Almost everything. Human aspects permeates throughout all parts of the iGEM competition, from the identities (in the broadest sense) of participants and the teams they are within to lab work to the decisions on project focus to the more obvious parts such as ethics. |
One thing I believe I'm good at is making people think. iGEM is a multidisciplinary experience. This situation lends itself to the encouraging of awareness of other ways of thinking than what one is used to. Through the interaction of people from various disciplines the way in which one starts to perceive what one is doing from another perspective. I have furthered that expansion during my time within the University of Edinburgh iGEM team by questioning how the team sees things from ethics to themselves as individuals. |
Our Project
***
Table of Contents
- A summary of what we achieved through the human aspects component of our project.
- Our vision of the future of the human aspects of synthetic biology, and where we would like to go next.
-
References used throughout the section.
