Team:Newcastle/Spider silk
From 2010.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
RachelBoyd (Talk | contribs) |
(→Background Info) |
||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
|http://www.naturia.per.sg/buloh/inverts/nephila.htm | |http://www.naturia.per.sg/buloh/inverts/nephila.htm | ||
|- | |- | ||
- | |[[Image:Spider Web.jpg]][[Image:Golden orb web.jpg]] | + | |[[Image:Spider Web.jpg|300px]] [[Image:Golden orb web.jpg|300px]] |
|} | |} | ||
+ | |||
==Major Ampulate Spidroin Proteins== | ==Major Ampulate Spidroin Proteins== | ||
{| | {| |
Revision as of 17:22, 12 June 2010
|
Contents |
Spider Silk
Background Info
Major Ampulate Spidroin Proteins
Spider silk is comparable in strength to carbon fibres |
Highly structured at the nanometre scale – not good for synthetic materials |
Repetitive structures- GXG motif |
Glycine rich segments – hard and soft segments alternating |
Hard= hydrogen bonding cross-linked crystallites (polyalanine) forming an amorphic beta sheet structure, |
Soft= flexibility (Glycine rich) |
Major protein from Nephila clavipes – MaSP1 tandem variants of |
A GQG GYG GLG SQG A GRG GLG GQG A GA6GGx |
MaSP2 also has a repetitive structure – difference soft segment contains proline containing pentamers: The consensus repeat is _GPGGY GPGQQ.3GPSGPGS A8. Similar structure to Elastin – elastic properties of drag-line by the folding of pentamer structure. |
In the spider – silk in 3 phases |
1) Extremely viscous (withstand shear forces inside spider), |
2) Liquid crystallite lower viscosity (near exit duct/glycine rich may be involved), |
3) Insoluble fibre (result of dehydration and drawing). |
MaSP1 and MaSP2 – Drag line |
MaSP1-Auxilary |
MaSP2- Glue silk only |
Neither- Cocoon silk |
Super contraction associated with pentamer motif when wet: low visco-elasticity |
Mimic natural proteins or simplify – Mimic structural significance still uncertain for some sequences |
DPB1- Optimised for B.subtilis |
B.subtilis potential host as simple secretion system compared to yeast. Secretion has advantages over expression in E.coli however; insufficient proportion of protein was secreted by yeast. |
Fahnestock, S. R., Yao, Z., & Bedzyk, L. a. (2000). Microbial production of spider silk pr}oteins. Journal of biotechnology, 74(2), 105-19. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11763501. |
Self Assembly and pH
Self assembly of Spider silk proteins is controlled by a pH sensitive relay. |
A drop to pH 6.3 and shearing forces are believes to result in the hard form of spider silk. |
Miniature spidroins (a few repeats 4repCT) form metre long fibres irrespective of pH. |
Introduction of N-terminal domain from MASP1 (Euprosthenops australis) |
to mini spidroins allows self assembly at pH 6.3 and delays aggregation above pH7. |
Relay- like mechanism N terminal regulates assembly. pH 8 NT-mini spidroins for long firbes over days at pH 6 they form rapidly. |
C-terminal domain promotes Silk formation by ordering the repetitive segments. |
Askarieh, G. et al., 2010. Self-assembly of spider silk proteins is controlled by a pH-sensitive relay. Nature, 465(7295), 236-238. Available at: http://www.nature.com/doifinder/10.1038/nature08962. |