"
Team:UPO-Sevilla/Biobricks/Devices
From 2010.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
| Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
<h2>Device 6. Type: reporter</h2> | <h2>Device 6. Type: reporter</h2> | ||
| - | <img class="device" src="https:// | + | <img class="device" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/a/a8/BacterialCrowdingDevice06.png" alt="Bacterial Crowding Device 06"/> |
<p><strong>Notes:</strong></p> | <p><strong>Notes:</strong></p> | ||
Revision as of 15:32, 14 September 2010
Devices
Device 1. Type: protein generator
Notes:
Device 2. Type: protein generator
Notes: We decided not to build this divice due to the fact that it already exists in E. coli K12 strain.
Device 3. Type: protein generator
Notes:
Device 4. Type: protein generator
Notes:
Device 5. Type: reporter
Notes:
Device 6. Type: reporter
Notes:
Device 7. Type: Protein generator/Signal sender
Notes:
Device 8. Type: Protein generator/Signal sender
Notes:
Device 9. Type: Protein generator/Signal sender
Notes:
Device 10. Type: Protein generator/Signal sender
Notes: Finally we chose aspartate like the best attractant for E. coli. This is why Glutamate Synthase divices were not going to continue building.
Device 11. Type: Protein generator/Signal sender
Notes: Finally we chose aspartate like the best attractant for E. coli. This is why Glutamate Synthase divices were not going to continue building.
Device 12. Type: Protein generator/Signal sender
Notes: Finally we chose aspartate like the best attractant for E. coli. This is why Glutamate Synthase divices were not going to continue building.
Device 13. Type: Protein generator/Signal sender
Notes:
Device 14. Type: Protein generator/Signal sender
Notes:
Device 15. Type: Protein generator/Signal sender
Notes:
Device 16. Type: Constitutive protein generator/reporter
Notes:
Sponsors
