Team:UNAM-Genomics Mexico/Modules
From 2010.igem.org
(New page: {{Team:UNAM-Genomics_Mexico/Templates/Main2 |Spanish= __NOTOC__ <html><a href="https://2010.igem.org/Team:UNAM-Genomics_Mexico/es/Red_Green/Description"><img src="https://2010.igem.org/wiki/...) |
|||
Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
|Main_Content= | |Main_Content= | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
- | ==This is the | + | ==Individual Modules== |
- | This | + | |
+ | We decided to break down our device into 3 sub-devices: Reception, Emission, and Transmission. The rationale is as follows: the machinery that transforms the red input into chemical information is independent from the machinery that transforms chemical information into green output, and both are quite different from what transmits the information. Therefore, we can work with & model these three sub-devices. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ===Red Reception=== | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ====Description==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Red Reception is composed of a two-component system. Firstly, the chimeric protein Cph8 possess a light-sensing domain (PCB) and a histidine kinase domain (EnvZ). The chromophore has two states, and light triggers the passage of state. Thus, under dark conditions Cph8 shows kinase activity; under light conditions it does not. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Cph8's substrate is OmpR, a well studied Transcription Factor. When phosphorilated it shows greater affinity for DNA. OmpR regulates two promoters in an antagonistic way: in high concentrations of active OmpR, OmpC is active and OmpF is repressed. In low concentrations of active OmpR, OmpC is repressed and OmpF is active. | ||
+ | |||
+ | We plan on constructing our reporter genes under the OmpF promoter and starting our system in a <Dark> state (where active OmpR concentration is high). Thus we hope to achieve an <IF Light> logic gate by using Cph8 as a sensing mechanism, and OmpF as a response one. | ||
+ | |||
+ | The input for this sub-device is light, the output is Polymerases per Second. | ||
+ | |||
+ | See also, [http://partsregistry.org/Coliroid Coliroid]. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ====Signaling Cascade==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | When our device is struck by red light, the following cascade will ensure: | ||
+ | * Photon input | ||
+ | * PCB conformation change | ||
+ | * EnvZ kinase activity abolished | ||
+ | * Phosphorilated OmpR concentration collapse} | ||
+ | * Pops output | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ===Green Emission=== | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ====Description==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Green Emission is composed of a series of enzymes that generate light by the oxidation of a substrate. Our sub-device has 6 enzymes (LuxA, LuxB, LuxC, LuxD, LuxE, LuxY), two catalyze the oxidation step (LuxA, LuxB), one adjusts the emission spectrum (LuxY), and three generate and recycle the substrate (LuxC, LuxD, LuxE). We plan on having the adjusting enzyme, as well as the 3 regenerating enzymes expressed constitutively. We would then only use the oxidation enzymes as reporters for whatever event we are observing. | ||
+ | |||
+ | While the oxidation per se does not generate light, it does generate an intermediate molecule in an electronically exited state. When said molecule returns to a basal energy state, a photon is released. | ||
+ | |||
+ | As you may imagine, these genes constitute an Operon. This is the Lux Operon from Vibrio fischeri. The input for this sub-device is Polymerases per Second, and the output is light. | ||
+ | |||
+ | See also the work of [https://2009.igem.org/Team:Edinburgh/biology(biobricks) Edinburgh 2009]. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ====Signaling Cascade==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | When our device recieves Pops, the following cascade will ensure: | ||
+ | * Pops intput | ||
+ | * Transcription of genes downstream of OmpF promoter: LuxA & LuxB | ||
+ | * Oxidation of substrate | ||
+ | * Photon output | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ===Green Reception=== | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ====Description==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Green Reception is composed of a two-component system. Firstly, we have a sensing agent (CcaS). This protein shows two basal states, both with histidine kinase activities but each with an affinity for different substrates: a phenomenon known as photoconversion. We plan on using the Green phase regulator (CcaR) who happens to be a Transcription Factor. | ||
+ | |||
+ | When our regulator is in a phosphorilate state, it shows greater affinity for DNA. Thus it is active. The target promoter region has been recently identified. We thus plan on constructing our reporter genes under this promoter. Such a construction would be an <IF Light> logic gate. This system is quite similar to the EnvZ-OmpR system. | ||
+ | |||
+ | The input for this sub-device is light, the output is Polymerases per Second. | ||
+ | |||
+ | See also [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2474522/ this paper]. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ====Signaling Cascade==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | When our device is struck by green light, the following cascade will ensure: | ||
+ | * Photon input | ||
+ | * CcaS switches to Green conformation | ||
+ | * Kinase activity starts | ||
+ | * Phosphorilated CcaR concentration builds up | ||
+ | * Pops output | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ===Blue Emission=== | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ====Description==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Blue Emission is composed of a series of enzymes that generate light by the oxidation of a substrate. Our sub-device has 6 enzymes (LuxA, LuxB, LuxC, LuxD, LuxE, LumP), two catalyze the oxidation step (LuxA, LuxB), one adjusts the emission spectrum (LumP), and three generate and recycle the substrate (LuxC, LuxD, LuxE). We plan on having the adjusting enzyme, as well as the 3 regenerating enzymes expressed constitutively. We would then only use the oxidation enzymes as reporters for whatever event we are observing. | ||
+ | |||
+ | While the oxidation per se does not generate light, it does generate an intermediate molecule in an electronically exited state. When said molecule returns to a basal energy state, a photon is released. Likewise, LumP does not actually shift the spectrum, but the enzyme generates a substrate that does. | ||
+ | |||
+ | As you may imagine, these genes (sauf LumP) constitute an Operon. This is the Lux Operon from Vibrio fischeri. The input for this sub-device is Polymerases per Second, and the output is light. | ||
+ | |||
+ | See also the work of [https://2009.igem.org/Team:Edinburgh/biology(biobricks) Edinburgh 2009]. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ====Signaling Cascade==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | When our device receives Pops, the following cascade will ensure: | ||
+ | * Pops input | ||
+ | * Transcription of genes downstream of target promoter: LuxA & LuxB | ||
+ | * Oxidation of substrate | ||
+ | * Photon output | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
}} | }} |
Revision as of 21:05, 2 August 2010
Individual Modules
We decided to break down our device into 3 sub-devices: Reception, Emission, and Transmission. The rationale is as follows: the machinery that transforms the red input into chemical information is independent from the machinery that transforms chemical information into green output, and both are quite different from what transmits the information. Therefore, we can work with & model these three sub-devices.
Red Reception
Description
Red Reception is composed of a two-component system. Firstly, the chimeric protein Cph8 possess a light-sensing domain (PCB) and a histidine kinase domain (EnvZ). The chromophore has two states, and light triggers the passage of state. Thus, under dark conditions Cph8 shows kinase activity; under light conditions it does not.
Cph8's substrate is OmpR, a well studied Transcription Factor. When phosphorilated it shows greater affinity for DNA. OmpR regulates two promoters in an antagonistic way: in high concentrations of active OmpR, OmpC is active and OmpF is repressed. In low concentrations of active OmpR, OmpC is repressed and OmpF is active.
We plan on constructing our reporter genes under the OmpF promoter and starting our system in a <Dark> state (where active OmpR concentration is high). Thus we hope to achieve an <IF Light> logic gate by using Cph8 as a sensing mechanism, and OmpF as a response one.
The input for this sub-device is light, the output is Polymerases per Second.
See also, [http://partsregistry.org/Coliroid Coliroid].
Signaling Cascade
When our device is struck by red light, the following cascade will ensure:
- Photon input
- PCB conformation change
- EnvZ kinase activity abolished
- Phosphorilated OmpR concentration collapse}
- Pops output
Green Emission
Description
Green Emission is composed of a series of enzymes that generate light by the oxidation of a substrate. Our sub-device has 6 enzymes (LuxA, LuxB, LuxC, LuxD, LuxE, LuxY), two catalyze the oxidation step (LuxA, LuxB), one adjusts the emission spectrum (LuxY), and three generate and recycle the substrate (LuxC, LuxD, LuxE). We plan on having the adjusting enzyme, as well as the 3 regenerating enzymes expressed constitutively. We would then only use the oxidation enzymes as reporters for whatever event we are observing.
While the oxidation per se does not generate light, it does generate an intermediate molecule in an electronically exited state. When said molecule returns to a basal energy state, a photon is released.
As you may imagine, these genes constitute an Operon. This is the Lux Operon from Vibrio fischeri. The input for this sub-device is Polymerases per Second, and the output is light.
See also the work of Edinburgh 2009.
Signaling Cascade
When our device recieves Pops, the following cascade will ensure:
- Pops intput
- Transcription of genes downstream of OmpF promoter: LuxA & LuxB
- Oxidation of substrate
- Photon output
Green Reception
Description
Green Reception is composed of a two-component system. Firstly, we have a sensing agent (CcaS). This protein shows two basal states, both with histidine kinase activities but each with an affinity for different substrates: a phenomenon known as photoconversion. We plan on using the Green phase regulator (CcaR) who happens to be a Transcription Factor.
When our regulator is in a phosphorilate state, it shows greater affinity for DNA. Thus it is active. The target promoter region has been recently identified. We thus plan on constructing our reporter genes under this promoter. Such a construction would be an <IF Light> logic gate. This system is quite similar to the EnvZ-OmpR system.
The input for this sub-device is light, the output is Polymerases per Second.
See also [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2474522/ this paper].
Signaling Cascade
When our device is struck by green light, the following cascade will ensure:
- Photon input
- CcaS switches to Green conformation
- Kinase activity starts
- Phosphorilated CcaR concentration builds up
- Pops output
Blue Emission
Description
Blue Emission is composed of a series of enzymes that generate light by the oxidation of a substrate. Our sub-device has 6 enzymes (LuxA, LuxB, LuxC, LuxD, LuxE, LumP), two catalyze the oxidation step (LuxA, LuxB), one adjusts the emission spectrum (LumP), and three generate and recycle the substrate (LuxC, LuxD, LuxE). We plan on having the adjusting enzyme, as well as the 3 regenerating enzymes expressed constitutively. We would then only use the oxidation enzymes as reporters for whatever event we are observing.
While the oxidation per se does not generate light, it does generate an intermediate molecule in an electronically exited state. When said molecule returns to a basal energy state, a photon is released. Likewise, LumP does not actually shift the spectrum, but the enzyme generates a substrate that does.
As you may imagine, these genes (sauf LumP) constitute an Operon. This is the Lux Operon from Vibrio fischeri. The input for this sub-device is Polymerases per Second, and the output is light.
See also the work of Edinburgh 2009.
Signaling Cascade
When our device receives Pops, the following cascade will ensure:
- Pops input
- Transcription of genes downstream of target promoter: LuxA & LuxB
- Oxidation of substrate
- Photon output
iGEM
iGEM is the International Genetically Engineered Machines Competition, held each year at MIT and organized with support of the Parts Registry. See more here.Synthetic Biology
This is defined as attempting to manipulate living objects as if they were man-made machines, specifically in terms of genetic engineering. See more here.Genomics
We are students on the Genomic Sciences program at the Center for Genomic Sciences of the National Autonomous University of Mexico, campus Morelos. See more here.This site is best viewed with a Webkit based Browser (eg: Google's Chrome, Apple's Safari),
Trident based (Microsoft's Internet Explorer) or Presto based (Opera) are not currently supported. Sorry.