Team:Calgary/Project/IbpAB
From 2010.igem.org
Pauladamiak (Talk | contribs) |
Emily Hicks (Talk | contribs) |
||
Line 90: | Line 90: | ||
- | + | <h2 style="color:#0066CC">How does a native <i>E. coli</i> cell combat protein related stress in the Cytoplasm?</h2> | |
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | <h2 style="color:#0066CC">How does a native <i>E. coli</i> cell combat protein related stress?</h2> | + | |
<p> | <p> |
Revision as of 10:27, 27 October 2010
Cytoplasmic Stress Detectors
How does a native E. coli cell combat protein related stress in the Cytoplasm?
There are several heat shock pathways in E. coli which are actively transcribed in response to cellular stress. There are housekeeping genes called sigma factors that are responsible for maintaining homeostasis in the cell and helping with protein folding. Sigma32 is a factor that is crucial for maintaining and monitoring heat shock responses in the cytoplasm of E. coli. Sigma 32 and other house keeping factors act as transcription factors for small heat shock proteins (sHsps). sHsps consist of proteins such as ibpA, ibpB, DnaK, DnaJ, GroEL and GroES. Amongst these, IbpA (inclusion body binding proteins) and ibpB are two different proteins that are activated as a result of cytoplasmic stress response. IbpA and ibpB proteins are chaperones that are responsible for refolding aggregated bodies and inclusion bodies into their native conformation.
iGEM Calgary cytoplasmic stress detection circuit
The cytoplasmic stress detector has a fusion of sigma 32 activated heat shock promoter which allows a higher output compared to the ibpAB promoter and FxsA promoter |
Rationale behind picking this promoter
In our cytoplasmic stress detector circuit, we decided to fuse two different promoter regions from two heat shock proteins, which are ibpAB and fxsA. In a study done by Kraft et al, they demonstrate that a fusion of IbpAB/fxsA promoters combined along with T7 DNA has a significantly higher output as a result of heat shock compared to the promoters individually.
B: MalE31 induction with IPTG; C: MalE31 induction and reporter reading with just ibpAB promoter; D: MalE31 induction and reporter reading with just fxsA promoter; E: MalE31 induction and reporter reading with ibpAB/FxsA fusion promoter (Kraft et al, 2006)
How are we utilizing this promoter?
This fusion promoter will be connected to the registry part I13504 which is RBS-GFP-B0015. The ibpAB/fxsA circuit will be activated in the presence of aggregation in the cell. We will be using MalE31 with a signal sequence deletion (MalE31∆SS) which was designed by Betton et al. The native E. coli protein MalE generally exported into the periplasmic space but this mutated protein does not get exported to the periplasmic space due to the signal sequence deletion. Also Betton et al designed MalE31such that there are two amino acid changes in the protein and it misfolds. The MalE31∆SS protein coding region will be used in order to induce cytoplasmic protein stress in E. coli.
Ideally, this misfolded MalE31∆SS should activate the plasmid system containing ibpAB/fxsA-I13504 which will produce GFP alerting the researcher that their protein is not being expressed in the cell because it is misfolding and as a result getting degraded. Our circuit should also be activated much faster than the native stress system because the ibpAB/fxsA promoter is much more sensitive to the presence of aggregate bodies in the cell. The promoter also gives a much higher output compared to the promoters individually, which is the case in the E. coli genome which should allow us to detect the fluorescence level much faster.