"
Team:MIT tconst
From 2010.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
| Line 113: | Line 113: | ||
<b class="bolded" id="lptconst">LPT Construction</b><br> | <b class="bolded" id="lptconst">LPT Construction</b><br> | ||
Searching through literature, we happened upon evidence of a super-sensitive cI (the lambda repressor from the pTSMa) that would be much more easily cleaved in UV-exposed cells. Luckily, this change from wildtype cI to the sensitive cI took a single SDM round, and we produced pLPTa, the Low Power Toggle.<br> | Searching through literature, we happened upon evidence of a super-sensitive cI (the lambda repressor from the pTSMa) that would be much more easily cleaved in UV-exposed cells. Luckily, this change from wildtype cI to the sensitive cI took a single SDM round, and we produced pLPTa, the Low Power Toggle.<br> | ||
| - | <div class="sidep" style="float:left; width:400px;"><a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/c/cb/Sdm.png" class="thickbox"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/c/cb/Sdm.png" width=400px></a>Through a single point mutation by SDM, the MIT iGEM team was able to change pTSMa into pLPTa, a toggle that requires much less UV power to switch | + | <div class="sidep" style="float:left; width:400px;"><a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/c/cb/Sdm.png" class="thickbox"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/c/cb/Sdm.png" width=400px></a>Through a single point mutation by SDM, the MIT iGEM team was able to change pTSMa into pLPTa, a toggle that requires much less UV power to switch between states.</div><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> |
<b class="bolded" id="improved">Improved Toggle</b><br> | <b class="bolded" id="improved">Improved Toggle</b><br> | ||
Revision as of 19:26, 25 October 2010
iGEM 2010
the bacterial uv toggle |
|||
In the beginning, there was a UV Toggle (Collins, 2000). The 2010 MIT iGEM team saw that it was good, and decided to implement the Collins toggle in E.coli to create cells with bistable phenotypes. We planned for the toggle to create patterned fluorescence and phage polymerization in response to exposing the cells to UV light. | |||
| |||
|
First Circuit Collins Toggle Validation We first wanted to make sure the parts we were working with were functional and reliable. As we wished to use the pTSMa plasmid as part of our circuit, we tested the original Collins toggle (pTSMa co-transformed with pCIRa).  Our recreation of the Collins toggle experiment validated pTSMa as a functional bistable toggle plasmid.  The basic Collins Toggle plasmids pTSMa and pCIRa. We used pTSMa in our own experiments as a bistable toggle. Our First Biobrick With our newly verified (borrowed) plasmid, we got to work on building our own response to UV induction. Using the same promoter used in pCIRa (the PcI-OR promoter that is induced by AHL/LuxR complex and inhibited by cI), we created a biobrick that would respond to UV induction by producing mCherry fluorescent protein when co-transformed with pTSMa. Our part would also constitutively produce LuxR, the protein that binds AHL and becomes a transcription factor that encourages the activity of the PcI-OR promoter.  Our first working part with a readout was K415006.  The first picture of mCherry fluorescence induced by UV light. After much fine-tuning of the power of the UV exposure, the concentrations of AHL and IPTG, and mask cutting, a pattern of fluorescence finally emerged -- the first image. Improved Bacterial Camera As an intermediate in our project, we had created a bacterial camera with the ability to take and store images, reproduce the image on command (when AHL is added to the medium), and reset the entire plate to a blank slate whenever we pleased. All these abilities were a result of the bistable toggle we implemented in our design. In the context of past iGEM bacterial cameras, our toggle-based camera is a great improvement. UT-Austin created the first bacterial camera in 2005, exposing their cells to light for 12-15 hours to produce an image. Our toggle can snap and store an image in a matter of seconds. AHL Propagation We wanted our cells to be self-inducing and our signal to be self-propagating in addition to the circuit being sensitive and specific to user inputs. To do this, we added a part that would generate one of the necessary chemicals for transcription of the mCherry fluorescent protein. Construction 
We dubbed this part K415023, a part that now (if AHL and LuxR were available within the cell) fluoresced green or red in vivo depending on the state of the co-transformed toggle construct pTSMa. In addition, it would produce AHL under the same conditions as mCherry. This part can thus propagate and amplify a signal from a starting point of a droplet of AHL or even from leaky expression of AHL.Movie In order to view the propagation, we recorded a movie beginning from the moment the cells were induced with UV. In addition to viewing the progression of the fluorescence, we were able to record how long it took for a true pattern of fluorescence to emerge in our cell lawn. Low Power Toggle  E.Coli population density as a function of UV exposure. Measured by drip assay.LPT Construction Searching through literature, we happened upon evidence of a super-sensitive cI (the lambda repressor from the pTSMa) that would be much more easily cleaved in UV-exposed cells. Luckily, this change from wildtype cI to the sensitive cI took a single SDM round, and we produced pLPTa, the Low Power Toggle.  Through a single point mutation by SDM, the MIT iGEM team was able to change pTSMa into pLPTa, a toggle that requires much less UV power to switch between states.Improved Toggle In order to truly understand the improvements we made in the Collins toggle, we exposed cells transformed with either pTSMa and K415023 (our fluorescent output), or pLPTa and K415023 to varying levels of UV. We hypothesized that we would get the toggle to turn "on" at a lower UV power with pLPTa. 
|
