Team:Chiba/Safety

From 2010.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
Line 207: Line 207:
<hr>
<hr>
<li> Our theme is double click system in bacteria and we expect that it will be used for eliminating false input.<br> It can raise accuracy of work to the target and reduce side effect by responding double click.<br>
<li> Our theme is double click system in bacteria and we expect that it will be used for eliminating false input.<br> It can raise accuracy of work to the target and reduce side effect by responding double click.<br>
-
We hope this system to be used for safety devise on labs.
+
We hope this system to be used for safety device on labs.
       </ul>
       </ul>
     </li>
     </li>
Line 217: Line 217:
         <li> how did you manage to handle the safety issue? </li>
         <li> how did you manage to handle the safety issue? </li>
         <li> How could other teams learn from your experience? </li>
         <li> How could other teams learn from your experience? </li>
 +
<hr>
 +
<li> We've desinged pulse generator and some hybrid promoters. We've also registed the parts.<br>
 +
We think construction of these parts can be used as safety device.<br>
 +
For example, hybrid promoter is low unregulated and repression for the promoter is stronger than activation for.<br>
 +
So, expression of DNA is occur in specific environment.
 +
 +
       </ul>
       </ul>
       </li>
       </li>

Revision as of 09:28, 26 October 2010




 




Key questions

For iGEM 2010 teams are asked to detail how they approached any issues of biological safety associated with their projects. Specifically, teams should consider the following questions:

  1. Would any of your project ideas raise safety issues in terms of:
    • researcher safety,
    • public safety, or
    • environmental safety?
    • Our theme is double click system in bacteria and we expect that it will be used for eliminating false input.
      It can raise accuracy of work to the target and reduce side effect by responding double click.
      We hope this system to be used for safety device on labs.



  2. Do any of the new BioBrick parts (or devices) that you made this year raise any safety issues? If yes,
    • did you document these issues in the Registry?
    • how did you manage to handle the safety issue?
    • How could other teams learn from your experience?
    • We've desinged pulse generator and some hybrid promoters. We've also registed the parts.
      We think construction of these parts can be used as safety device.
      For example, hybrid promoter is low unregulated and repression for the promoter is stronger than activation for.
      So, expression of DNA is occur in specific environment.
  3. Is there a local biosafety group, committee, or review board at your institution?
    • If yes, what does your local biosafety group think about your project?
    • If no, which specific biosafety rules or guidelines do you have to consider in your country?
  4. Do you have any other ideas how to deal with safety issues that could be useful for future iGEM competitions? How could parts, devices and systems be made even safer through biosafety engineering?

 


safety page.

Retrieved from "http://2010.igem.org/Team:Chiba/Safety"