Team:Lethbridge/Safety

From 2010.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
Line 106: Line 106:
=<font color="white">Safety Questions=
=<font color="white">Safety Questions=
-
==<font color="white">Would any of your project ideas raise safety issues in terms of:==
+
==<font color="white">How we address safety issues in terms of:==
-
<li>researcher safety,
+
===<font color="white">Researcher Safety===
-
<li>public safety, or
+
 
-
<li>environmental safety?
+
The U of L team project uses Escherichia coli bacteria, particularly the strains BL21 (DE3) and DH5α.  These strains are the most widely used bacteria in biotechnology, biological and biochemistry research due to their lack of pathogenicity.  These strains of bacteria are also very useful and possess many unique qualities that make them ideal for recombinant DNA experiments such as transformations and protein over expressions.  These experiments are the foundation for the majority of the projects in the iGEM competition and are one of the main reasons why these particular E. coli strains are used preferentially by a large proportion of laboratories around the world.  This means that at no point in time will any experimenters be exposed to pathogens.
 +
<br>
 +
<br>
 +
Many other precautions are also taken in our laboratory.  Aseptic technique is maintained at all times. Experimenters wear the appropriate protective laboratory clothing such as lab coats and lab goggles. As well, experimenters dispose of any harmful waste chemicals, such as chloroform, in the organic waste bucket located in the fume hood and any liquids or solvents that come into contact with bacteria are disposed off in a large vessel containing bleach. Therefore, there are no risks during the implementation of our project in the lab.
 +
 
 +
===<font color="white">Public Safety===
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
===<font color="white">Environmental Safety===

Revision as of 17:56, 23 October 2010




Contents

Safety

The University of Lethbridge iGEM 2010 team is actively involved in developing a synthetic biology-based approach to bioremediation of the tailing ponds. In line with this, the team has developed guidelines, which dictate what can and cannot be done in the laboratory. This is all done to ensure the safety of the experimenters (students), the environment and the public as a whole.

Safety Questions

How we address safety issues in terms of:

Researcher Safety

The U of L team project uses Escherichia coli bacteria, particularly the strains BL21 (DE3) and DH5α. These strains are the most widely used bacteria in biotechnology, biological and biochemistry research due to their lack of pathogenicity. These strains of bacteria are also very useful and possess many unique qualities that make them ideal for recombinant DNA experiments such as transformations and protein over expressions. These experiments are the foundation for the majority of the projects in the iGEM competition and are one of the main reasons why these particular E. coli strains are used preferentially by a large proportion of laboratories around the world. This means that at no point in time will any experimenters be exposed to pathogens.

Many other precautions are also taken in our laboratory. Aseptic technique is maintained at all times. Experimenters wear the appropriate protective laboratory clothing such as lab coats and lab goggles. As well, experimenters dispose of any harmful waste chemicals, such as chloroform, in the organic waste bucket located in the fume hood and any liquids or solvents that come into contact with bacteria are disposed off in a large vessel containing bleach. Therefore, there are no risks during the implementation of our project in the lab.

Public Safety

Environmental Safety

Do any of the new BioBrick parts (or devices) that you made this year raise any safety issues? If yes,

  • did you document these issues in the Registry?
  • how did you manage to handle the safety issue? 
  • How could other teams learn from your experience?

    Is there a local biosafety group, committee, or review board at your institution?

  • If yes, what does your local biosafety group think about your project? 
  • If no, which specific biosafety rules or guidelines do you have to consider in your country?

    Do you have any other ideas how to deal with safety issues that could be useful for future iGEM competitions?

    How could parts, devices and systems be made even safer through biosafety engineering?