Team:Washington/Gram Negative/Design
From 2010.igem.org
(→Diagram of the Tse2/Tsi2 HSL inducible circuit) |
(→Type Six Secretion System) |
||
Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
<!---------------------------------------PAGE CONTENT GOES BELOW THIS----------------------------------------> | <!---------------------------------------PAGE CONTENT GOES BELOW THIS----------------------------------------> | ||
- | =Type Six Secretion System= | + | =Designing the Transfer of the Type Six Secretion System into ''E. coli''= |
==Using a fosmid to transfer the T6SS genes into ''E. coli''== | ==Using a fosmid to transfer the T6SS genes into ''E. coli''== | ||
- | The T6SS is comprised of 23 genes | + | The T6SS is comprised of 23 genes across several operons. Capturing and moving these genes via standard restriction digest cloning was determined to be impractical. We discovered that the sequence of the ''P. aeruginosa'' strain (PAO1) we were using was solved using fosmids (essentially large plasmids). We were able to locate these fosmids and were very excited to find that one of the fosmids contained all of the necessary T6SS genes organized nicely in two divergent operons. We successfully transferred the fosmid into ''E. coli''. It was not clear, however, whether or not the genes would be expressed in ''E. coli'', since the promoters that controlled the expression of the T6SS genes on the fosmid were ''P. aeruginosa''' genes. In order to verify expression of the T6SS genes we performed a Western blot using antibodies against Fha1, which is a critical protein of the secretion system and a reporter for T6SS activity. |
<br> | <br> | ||
- | [[Image:Washington T6SS Fosmid.jpg|500px|center]] | + | [[Image:Washington T6SS Fosmid.jpg|500px|center|thumb|'''Obtained Fosmid Contains T6SS Genes Organized into Two Divergent Operons''']] |
==Testing the native ''Pseudomonas aeriginosa'' promoter in ''E. coli''== | ==Testing the native ''Pseudomonas aeriginosa'' promoter in ''E. coli''== | ||
- | + | To determine whether the T6SS genes from the fosmid were being expressed from the native ''P. aeriginosa'' promoter, the fosmid was tranferred into ''E. coli'', and a Western blot was performed on cell extracts for Fha1, one of the proteins critical for T6SS activity. As expected, the Western blot showed no bands (shown below), indicating that ''E. coli'' was not transcribing from the native ''P. aeriginosa'' promoter. It was decided that the promoter would need to be changed to a bidirectional promoter compatible with ''E. coli''. It was decided that the native promoter would need to be switched to a bidirectional T7 promoter. T7 promoters are well characterized, and known to be highly robust. This makes them relatively easy to work with. | |
- | [[Image:T6SS_no_exp.jpg|650 px]] | + | [[Image:T6SS_no_exp.jpg|650 px|center|thumb|'''Expression of T6SS Components from the Fosmid Occurs in ''P. aeruginosa'' but Not in ''E. coli'']] |
=Tse2/Tsi2, Toxin/ Antitoxin System= | =Tse2/Tsi2, Toxin/ Antitoxin System= |
Revision as of 01:53, 21 October 2010
Designing the Transfer of the Type Six Secretion System into E. coli
Using a fosmid to transfer the T6SS genes into E. coli
The T6SS is comprised of 23 genes across several operons. Capturing and moving these genes via standard restriction digest cloning was determined to be impractical. We discovered that the sequence of the P. aeruginosa strain (PAO1) we were using was solved using fosmids (essentially large plasmids). We were able to locate these fosmids and were very excited to find that one of the fosmids contained all of the necessary T6SS genes organized nicely in two divergent operons. We successfully transferred the fosmid into E. coli. It was not clear, however, whether or not the genes would be expressed in E. coli, since the promoters that controlled the expression of the T6SS genes on the fosmid were P. aeruginosa' genes. In order to verify expression of the T6SS genes we performed a Western blot using antibodies against Fha1, which is a critical protein of the secretion system and a reporter for T6SS activity.
Testing the native Pseudomonas aeriginosa promoter in E. coli
To determine whether the T6SS genes from the fosmid were being expressed from the native P. aeriginosa promoter, the fosmid was tranferred into E. coli, and a Western blot was performed on cell extracts for Fha1, one of the proteins critical for T6SS activity. As expected, the Western blot showed no bands (shown below), indicating that E. coli was not transcribing from the native P. aeriginosa promoter. It was decided that the promoter would need to be changed to a bidirectional promoter compatible with E. coli. It was decided that the native promoter would need to be switched to a bidirectional T7 promoter. T7 promoters are well characterized, and known to be highly robust. This makes them relatively easy to work with.
Tse2/Tsi2, Toxin/ Antitoxin System
Regulating the Toxin and Antitoxin
The purpose of the Tse2/Tsi2, toxin/antitoxin, circuit is to regulate the probiotic in a way that allows it to be more effective at killing gram-negative bacteria. If our probiotic system were constantly producing Tse2 and killing gram-negative cells there would be an increased chance of the E.Coli evolving and developing resistance to the tse2. The helpful gut flora would also be adversely affected. It would therefore be preferential to be able to activate the T6SS/Tse2/Tsi2 system only when a pathogen is present. While it is possible to regulate this probiotic system by regulating the expression of the T6SS, the response time of such a system would be limited by the complexity of the T6SS. Consequentially it would be most effective to be able to activate our probiotic by inducing Tse2 expression only in the presence of a pathogen.
Design of our Inducable Tse2/Tsi2 system
Activating Tse2 production when a pathogen is present requires a promoter that is inducible by some molecular stimulus unique to a specific pathogen. In addition, the expression of Tsi2 would need to be constituitive, or induced by the same stimulus that induced Tse2 expression. As a proof-of-concept, this project uses the LuxR-pLux transcription factor- promoter system from Vibrio fischeri to regulate expression of the Tse2-Tsi2 locus. V. fischeri excretes 3OC6HSL, a small membrane permeable molecule(hereafter referred to as HSL). HSL binds to LuxR, changing the conformation of LuxR, which then induces the pLux promoter. Since V. fischeri also produces HSL, expression from the pLux promoter is linked to cell density. This is referred to as quorum sensing. Quorum sensing is found in many pathogenic species, making the use of the pLux-LuxR system a good proof-of concept. When our probiotic detects a gram-negative pathogen-specific molecule (modeled by HSL), transcription is induced by an inducible promoter (modeled by pLux). This leads to expression of Tse2 (a toxic protein) and Tsi2 (its antitoxin). The T6SS then attacks the pathogen, puncturing the cell wall. Tse2 is then secreted into the gram negative pathogen, killing the pathogen. This system could easily be modified to target a wide range of gram-negative pathogens by just changing the regulation of the Tse2/Tsi2 locus.
Diagram of the Tse2/Tsi2 HSL inducible circuit
The Tse2/Tsi2, toxin/antitoxin, system has a relatively simple circuit design. Tse2 and Tsi2 are present in one operon (as in Pseudomonas aeruginosa) and are regulated by the pLux promoter. The LuxR transcriptional factor is constituitively expressed because no tetR is present to repress the production of LuxR. When HSl is present it binds to LuxR resulting in the induction of Tse2 and Tsi2 production. The pTet, LuxR, and pLux region of the construct is present in part [http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_F2620 F2620]. This made the construction of the circuit considerably easier.