Team:Newcastle/5 August 2010
From 2010.igem.org
Shethharsh08 (Talk | contribs) (→PCR) |
|||
(50 intermediate revisions not shown) | |||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
==Aim== | ==Aim== | ||
- | The aim of the experiment is to | + | The aim of the experiment is to check for the PCR amplified RocF frangments that was performed on 4th August, 2010 by using gel electrophorsis. |
==Materials and Protocol== | ==Materials and Protocol== | ||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
==Result== | ==Result== | ||
- | * '''Lane 1''': | + | [[Image:Newcastle_050810_first_PCR_gel.png|400px]] |
+ | |||
+ | '''Figure 1''': Gel electrophoresis of the pSB1C3, Pspac_oid promoter, ''rocF'' fragments and double terminator. | ||
+ | |||
+ | * '''Lane 1''': 1 Kb DNA ladder | ||
* '''Lane 2''': BioBrick compatible vector pSB1C3 | * '''Lane 2''': BioBrick compatible vector pSB1C3 | ||
* '''Lane 3''': Pspac_oid promoter | * '''Lane 3''': Pspac_oid promoter | ||
Line 17: | Line 21: | ||
* '''Lane 6''': 3rd fragment of ''rocF'' CDS | * '''Lane 6''': 3rd fragment of ''rocF'' CDS | ||
* '''Lane 7''': Double Terminator | * '''Lane 7''': Double Terminator | ||
- | * '''Lane 8''': | + | * '''Lane 8''': 1 Kb DNA ladder |
{|border=1 | {|border=1 | ||
Line 31: | Line 35: | ||
|'''Size of the Fragment (in bp)''' | |'''Size of the Fragment (in bp)''' | ||
|2072 approx. | |2072 approx. | ||
- | | | + | |148 approx. |
|246 approx. | |246 approx. | ||
|597 approx. | |597 approx. | ||
Line 40: | Line 44: | ||
==Discussion== | ==Discussion== | ||
- | + | Correct sized bands were observed in lanes 2,4,5,6 and 7. However lane 3 did not contain any band. | |
==Conclusion== | ==Conclusion== | ||
- | + | PCR reaction was successful for all the fragments apart from Pspac_oid promoter which was represented in lane 3. This could be due to the following prpeblems: | |
# Primer sequences could be incorrect. | # Primer sequences could be incorrect. | ||
# Melting temperature could be incorrect. | # Melting temperature could be incorrect. | ||
Line 50: | Line 54: | ||
==Solution for the problem== | ==Solution for the problem== | ||
# Check the primer sequences so as to eliminate any problems associated with the primer sequence. | # Check the primer sequences so as to eliminate any problems associated with the primer sequence. | ||
- | # Perform PCR reactions for the Pspac_oid fragment with 3 different melting temperatures | + | # Perform PCR reactions for the Pspac_oid fragment with 3 different melting temperatures at 50°C, 51°C and 52°C. |
- | + | =Amplification of the Pspac_oid promoter and RocF fragments by PCR= | |
- | =Amplification of Pspac_oid promoter by PCR= | + | |
==Aim== | ==Aim== | ||
- | The aim of this experiment is to amplify Pspac_oid promoter fragment from plasmid pMutin4 for the construction of [[Team:Newcastle/Urease|''rocF'' BioBrick]] | + | The aim of this experiment is to amplify the Pspac_oid promoter fragment from the plasmid pMutin4 for the construction of the [[Team:Newcastle/Urease|''rocF'' BioBrick]] using 3 different melting temperatures in the Phusion PCR protocol, as well as to rerun the gel electrophoresis of the RocF fragments and the double terminator fragments obtained this morning. |
==Materials and Protocol== | ==Materials and Protocol== | ||
- | Please refer to [[Team:Newcastle/PCR| PCR]] for Phusion PCR protocol. The details for the 3 PCR reactions are mentioned below: | + | Please refer to [[Team:Newcastle/PCR| PCR]] for the Phusion PCR protocol. The details for the 3 PCR reactions are mentioned below: |
===PCR=== | ===PCR=== | ||
Line 102: | Line 105: | ||
'''Table 2''': Table represents 3 different Phusion PCR reactions for the amplification of Pspac_oid promoter, so that it can be ligated together with other fragments for the construction of ''rocF'' with the help of Gibson Cloning method. | '''Table 2''': Table represents 3 different Phusion PCR reactions for the amplification of Pspac_oid promoter, so that it can be ligated together with other fragments for the construction of ''rocF'' with the help of Gibson Cloning method. | ||
- | * The extension rate of the Phusion polymerase is 1Kb/ 30 seconds. | + | * The extension rate of the Phusion polymerase is 1Kb/ 30 seconds. Therefore the extension time of each PCR reaction is different. |
- | * | + | * To learn more about the ''rocF'' fragments, please refer to the [[Media:Cloning_strategy_for_rocF.pdf|Cloning strategy for ''rocF'']]. |
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
==Result== | ==Result== | ||
- | + | [[Image:Newcastle_050810_PCR_100bp_second_gel.png|500px]] | |
- | + | '''Figure 2''': Gel electrophoresis of the pSB1C3, Pspac_oid promoter, rocF fragments and double terminator. | |
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | |||
* '''Lane 1''': 100bp DNA ladder | * '''Lane 1''': 100bp DNA ladder | ||
* '''Lane 2''': 1st fragment of ''rocF'' CDS | * '''Lane 2''': 1st fragment of ''rocF'' CDS | ||
Line 172: | Line 122: | ||
* '''Lane 8''': Pspac_oid promoter (Tm 52°C i.e. Tube 3 of PCR reaction which is mentioned above) | * '''Lane 8''': Pspac_oid promoter (Tm 52°C i.e. Tube 3 of PCR reaction which is mentioned above) | ||
* '''Lane 9''': 100bp DNA ladder | * '''Lane 9''': 100bp DNA ladder | ||
+ | |||
{|border=1 | {|border=1 | ||
Line 183: | Line 134: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|'''Size of the Fragment (in bp)''' | |'''Size of the Fragment (in bp)''' | ||
- | | | + | |148 approx. |
|246 approx. | |246 approx. | ||
|597 approx. | |597 approx. | ||
Line 189: | Line 140: | ||
|116 approx. | |116 approx. | ||
|} | |} | ||
+ | |||
'''Table 3''': Table represents the size of the fragments represented as bands on the gel in their corresponding lanes. | '''Table 3''': Table represents the size of the fragments represented as bands on the gel in their corresponding lanes. | ||
==Discussion== | ==Discussion== | ||
- | + | Correct bands size was observed in all lanes. The three different melting temperature used during the PCR for the Pspac_oid promoter were successful. | |
==Conclusion== | ==Conclusion== | ||
- | + | The amplified fragments of ''RocF'', double terminator and the Pspac_oid promoter have been successful. | |
- | + | ||
- | == | + | =Concrete Tensile Splitting Test= |
- | + | ||
+ | ==Aim== | ||
- | + | To obtain samples of cracked concrete for BacillaFilla to fill up the cracks and also to determine the tensile strength of concrete before the cracks are filled up. | |
- | == | + | ==Materials== |
- | + | ||
- | + | * Concrete cylinder | |
- | + | * Jubilee clips | |
- | == | + | ==Procedure== |
- | {| | + | |
+ | # A concrete cylinder was made beforehand and left for more than 28 days to cure so that a straight line of crack will form down the diameter of the cylinder. | ||
+ | # The cylinder is placed on two diametrically opposed loading generators. Two pieces of plywood are placed between the loading plates and the concrete cylinder to prevent failure in compression. | ||
+ | # The generator is then started for loading until the cylinder forms a crack down the diameter. The maximum load is recorded and tensile strength of the concrete cylinder is calculated. | ||
+ | |||
+ | {| | ||
|- | |- | ||
- | + | |[[Image:Newcastle_Concrete_6.jpg|thumb|Concrete cylinder]] | |
- | + | |[[Image:Newcastle_Concrete_7.jpg|thumb|Loading generator]] | |
- | + | |[[Image:Newcastle_Concrete_8.jpg|thumb|Cracked concrete]] | |
- | + | |[[Image:Newcastle_Concrete_9.jpg|thumb|Steven giving his baby to Phil]] | |
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | | | + | |
- | | | + | |
- | | | + | |
- | | | + | |
- | | | + | |
- | | | + | |
- | | | + | |
- | + | ||
- | | | + | |
- | | | + | |
- | | | + | |
- | | | + | |
- | | | + | |
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
|} | |} | ||
- | + | [[Image:Newcastle Concrete 10.jpg|thumb|Failure load]] | |
- | + | ||
+ | ==Result== | ||
+ | |||
+ | The maximum load that is recorded from the test is 171.3 kN. | ||
==Discussion== | ==Discussion== | ||
- | + | From the formula f=(2P)/(πBD), | |
+ | where f=tensile strength, | ||
+ | P=Maximum applied load, | ||
+ | B=Depth of cylinder, | ||
+ | D=Diameter of cylinder, | ||
+ | |||
+ | With the depth and diameter of the cylinder as 30m and 15m respectively, we calculated the maximum tensile strength of this concrete cylinder to be 242.3 kN/m². | ||
==Conclusion== | ==Conclusion== | ||
- | + | We now have the original tensile strength of the concrete cylinder, which is 242.3 kN/m². We will test its tensile strength again after the concrete has been filled up by BacillaFilla. | |
- | + |
Latest revision as of 22:57, 27 October 2010
|
Contents |
Gel Electrophoresis for the Amplified Fragments of rocF
Aim
The aim of the experiment is to check for the PCR amplified RocF frangments that was performed on 4th August, 2010 by using gel electrophorsis.
Materials and Protocol
Please refer to: Gel electrophoresis.
Result
Figure 1: Gel electrophoresis of the pSB1C3, Pspac_oid promoter, rocF fragments and double terminator.
- Lane 1: 1 Kb DNA ladder
- Lane 2: BioBrick compatible vector pSB1C3
- Lane 3: Pspac_oid promoter
- Lane 4: 1st fragment of rocF CDS
- Lane 5: 2nd fragment of rocF CDS
- Lane 6: 3rd fragment of rocF CDS
- Lane 7: Double Terminator
- Lane 8: 1 Kb DNA ladder
Biobrick compatible vector pSB1C3 | Pspac_oid pormoter | 1st fragment of rocF CDS | 2nd fragment of rocF CDS) | 3rd fragment of rocF CDS | Double Terminator | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Size of the Fragment (in bp) | 2072 approx. | 148 approx. | 246 approx. | 597 approx. | 125 approx. | 116 approx. |
Table 1: Table represents the size of the fragments represented as bands on the gel in their corresponding lanes.
Discussion
Correct sized bands were observed in lanes 2,4,5,6 and 7. However lane 3 did not contain any band.
Conclusion
PCR reaction was successful for all the fragments apart from Pspac_oid promoter which was represented in lane 3. This could be due to the following prpeblems:
- Primer sequences could be incorrect.
- Melting temperature could be incorrect.
- Plasmid pMutin4 could have degenerated due to long term storage.
Solution for the problem
- Check the primer sequences so as to eliminate any problems associated with the primer sequence.
- Perform PCR reactions for the Pspac_oid fragment with 3 different melting temperatures at 50°C, 51°C and 52°C.
Amplification of the Pspac_oid promoter and RocF fragments by PCR
Aim
The aim of this experiment is to amplify the Pspac_oid promoter fragment from the plasmid pMutin4 for the construction of the rocF BioBrick using 3 different melting temperatures in the Phusion PCR protocol, as well as to rerun the gel electrophoresis of the RocF fragments and the double terminator fragments obtained this morning.
Materials and Protocol
Please refer to PCR for the Phusion PCR protocol. The details for the 3 PCR reactions are mentioned below:
PCR
Tube | Part to be amplified | DNA fragment consisting the part | Forward primer | Reverse Primer | Melting Temperature (Tm in °C) | Size of the fragment (in bp) | Extension time* (in seconds) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Pspacoid Promoter | pMutin4 | P1P1 forward | P2P1 reverse | 51 | 106 approx. | 15 |
2 | Pspacoid Promoter | pMutin4 | P1P1 forward | P2P1 reverse | 50 | 106 approx. | 15 |
3 | Pspacoid Promoter | pMutin4 | P1P1 forward | P2P1 reverse | 52 | 106 approx. | 15 |
Table 2: Table represents 3 different Phusion PCR reactions for the amplification of Pspac_oid promoter, so that it can be ligated together with other fragments for the construction of rocF with the help of Gibson Cloning method.
- The extension rate of the Phusion polymerase is 1Kb/ 30 seconds. Therefore the extension time of each PCR reaction is different.
- To learn more about the rocF fragments, please refer to the Cloning strategy for rocF.
Result
Figure 2: Gel electrophoresis of the pSB1C3, Pspac_oid promoter, rocF fragments and double terminator.
- Lane 1: 100bp DNA ladder
- Lane 2: 1st fragment of rocF CDS
- Lane 3: 2nd fragment of rocF CDS
- Lane 4: 3rd fragment of rocF CDS
- Lane 5: Double Terminator
- Lane 6: Pspac_oid promoter (Tm 50°C i.e. Tube 2 of PCR reaction which is mentioned above)
- Lane 7: Pspac_oid promoter (Tm 51°C i.e. Tube 1 of PCR reaction which is mentioned above)
- Lane 8: Pspac_oid promoter (Tm 52°C i.e. Tube 3 of PCR reaction which is mentioned above)
- Lane 9: 100bp DNA ladder
Pspac_oid pormoter | 1st fragment of rocF CDS | 2nd fragment of rocF CDS) | 3rd fragment of rocF CDS | Double Terminator | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Size of the Fragment (in bp) | 148 approx. | 246 approx. | 597 approx. | 125 approx. | 116 approx. |
Table 3: Table represents the size of the fragments represented as bands on the gel in their corresponding lanes.
Discussion
Correct bands size was observed in all lanes. The three different melting temperature used during the PCR for the Pspac_oid promoter were successful.
Conclusion
The amplified fragments of RocF, double terminator and the Pspac_oid promoter have been successful.
Concrete Tensile Splitting Test
Aim
To obtain samples of cracked concrete for BacillaFilla to fill up the cracks and also to determine the tensile strength of concrete before the cracks are filled up.
Materials
- Concrete cylinder
- Jubilee clips
Procedure
- A concrete cylinder was made beforehand and left for more than 28 days to cure so that a straight line of crack will form down the diameter of the cylinder.
- The cylinder is placed on two diametrically opposed loading generators. Two pieces of plywood are placed between the loading plates and the concrete cylinder to prevent failure in compression.
- The generator is then started for loading until the cylinder forms a crack down the diameter. The maximum load is recorded and tensile strength of the concrete cylinder is calculated.
Result
The maximum load that is recorded from the test is 171.3 kN.
Discussion
From the formula f=(2P)/(πBD), where f=tensile strength, P=Maximum applied load, B=Depth of cylinder, D=Diameter of cylinder,
With the depth and diameter of the cylinder as 30m and 15m respectively, we calculated the maximum tensile strength of this concrete cylinder to be 242.3 kN/m².