Team:Newcastle/Meetings/10 February 2010

From 2010.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
(Formal meeting 10 February 2010)
 
(2 intermediate revisions not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Team:Newcastle/mainbanner}}
{{Team:Newcastle/mainbanner}}
-
Start time 3.30pm.
 
-
==Attendence==
+
==Formal meeting 10 February 2010==
-
Rhilip, Rachel, Zoltan, Harsh, Younus, Alan, Steven, Da, Jannetta, Richard, Neil, Jen and Matt
+
*Start time: 3.30 p.m.
 +
*Attendance: Philip, Rachel, Zoltan, Harsh, Younus, Alan, Steven, Da, Jannetta, Richard, Neil, Jen and Matt
 +
*[[Team:Newcastle/Agendas/10_February_2010| Agenda]]
-
==Timeline==
+
====Timeline====
* Everything up to the lab work is now on dotProject, except for DNA synthesis
* Everything up to the lab work is now on dotProject, except for DNA synthesis
* T-shirts and visas were brought forward by 3 months
* T-shirts and visas were brought forward by 3 months
Line 11: Line 12:
* Not added yet: iGEM deadlines, internal deadline for biobricks and the glass award decision  
* Not added yet: iGEM deadlines, internal deadline for biobricks and the glass award decision  
-
==Summary of last informal meeting==
+
====Summary of last informal meeting====
-
===Jannetta's idea===
+
=====Jannetta's idea=====
* Bacteria binding to beans, taking nitrogen up from the air.
* Bacteria binding to beans, taking nitrogen up from the air.
* Need more research, need a reason to think we can do this better than nature.
* Need more research, need a reason to think we can do this better than nature.
* Working with plants will be difficult, they take too long to grow so it would be hard to test.
* Working with plants will be difficult, they take too long to grow so it would be hard to test.
-
===Da's idea===
+
=====Da's idea=====
* Diabetes treatment.
* Diabetes treatment.
* Could the bacteria detect the insulin/blood sugar levels themselves?
* Could the bacteria detect the insulin/blood sugar levels themselves?
Line 24: Line 25:
* Look at the abstract of the relevant paper in the next meeting
* Look at the abstract of the relevant paper in the next meeting
-
===Steven's idea===
+
=====Steven's idea=====
* "Evolving non-evolvability"
* "Evolving non-evolvability"
* Recent issue of Nature is relevant
* Recent issue of Nature is relevant
Line 33: Line 34:
* Foundation advance award?
* Foundation advance award?
-
==More ideas==
+
====More ideas====
-
===Phil===
+
=====Phil=====
* Heavy water idea is infeasible because it is too difficult to detect biologically.
* Heavy water idea is infeasible because it is too difficult to detect biologically.
* Create DNA inside bacteria itself, would require a lot of proteins. Recombination of plasmids.
* Create DNA inside bacteria itself, would require a lot of proteins. Recombination of plasmids.
Line 42: Line 43:
* Foundation advance award again.
* Foundation advance award again.
-
==Modelling tutorial==
+
====Modelling tutorial====
* Will be finished next week.
* Will be finished next week.
* Computational modelling is useful when a system becomes too complex for a biologist to keep track of in their head.
* Computational modelling is useful when a system becomes too complex for a biologist to keep track of in their head.
Line 51: Line 52:
* Species: lacZ-CDS (coding sequence), plac - lac operon promoter, lacI-CDS, LacI-Lactose, LacI-prot, LacIdimer, Lactose - sugar, lacOperator-LacIdimer, LacZ-prot, RNApol, RNApol-plac, lacOperator, lacZ-mRNA.
* Species: lacZ-CDS (coding sequence), plac - lac operon promoter, lacI-CDS, LacI-Lactose, LacI-prot, LacIdimer, Lactose - sugar, lacOperator-LacIdimer, LacZ-prot, RNApol, RNApol-plac, lacOperator, lacZ-mRNA.
-
==Any other business==
+
====Any other business====
* The formal meeting time can't be brought earlier. What can we do about this? Skype?
* The formal meeting time can't be brought earlier. What can we do about this? Skype?
-
==Action points==
+
====Action points====
* Need one wiki page with our phone numbers
* Need one wiki page with our phone numbers
* Need a standing agenda
* Need a standing agenda

Latest revision as of 10:17, 27 October 2010

iGEM Homepage Newcastle University BacillaFilla Homepage Image Map

Contents

Formal meeting 10 February 2010

  • Start time: 3.30 p.m.
  • Attendance: Philip, Rachel, Zoltan, Harsh, Younus, Alan, Steven, Da, Jannetta, Richard, Neil, Jen and Matt
  • Agenda

Timeline

  • Everything up to the lab work is now on dotProject, except for DNA synthesis
  • T-shirts and visas were brought forward by 3 months
  • Everyone should familiarise themselves with it between now and next week's meeting
  • Not added yet: iGEM deadlines, internal deadline for biobricks and the glass award decision

Summary of last informal meeting

Jannetta's idea
  • Bacteria binding to beans, taking nitrogen up from the air.
  • Need more research, need a reason to think we can do this better than nature.
  • Working with plants will be difficult, they take too long to grow so it would be hard to test.
Da's idea
  • Diabetes treatment.
  • Could the bacteria detect the insulin/blood sugar levels themselves?
  • Could test in tissue culture
  • Need to look at ethical issues
  • Look at the abstract of the relevant paper in the next meeting
Steven's idea
  • "Evolving non-evolvability"
  • Recent issue of Nature is relevant
  • Zoltan mentioned a relevant paper
  • Richard: apply the same idea to protein? Check that protein still has the desired shape
  • A single base change in a protein can have a big effect on protein shape
  • Could use transition state analogue to see if enzyme is still binding correctly?
  • Foundation advance award?

More ideas

Phil
  • Heavy water idea is infeasible because it is too difficult to detect biologically.
  • Create DNA inside bacteria itself, would require a lot of proteins. Recombination of plasmids.
  • Instead of activating DNA, activate RNA instead?
  • Not many teams have looked at working with RNA, so novel.
  • Look up Christina Smolke's research on RNA synthetic biology
  • Foundation advance award again.

Modelling tutorial

  • Will be finished next week.
  • Computational modelling is useful when a system becomes too complex for a biologist to keep track of in their head.
  • The computer running the model will be able to give you precise numbers, and to tell you what happens over time.
  • Qualitative model: No numbers.
  • Quantitative model: Qualitative model + numbers.
  • We are talking about the lac operon.
  • Species: lacZ-CDS (coding sequence), plac - lac operon promoter, lacI-CDS, LacI-Lactose, LacI-prot, LacIdimer, Lactose - sugar, lacOperator-LacIdimer, LacZ-prot, RNApol, RNApol-plac, lacOperator, lacZ-mRNA.

Any other business

  • The formal meeting time can't be brought earlier. What can we do about this? Skype?

Action points

  • Need one wiki page with our phone numbers
  • Need a standing agenda
  • Need a higher-level overview of the timeline for Jen and Neil: just a list of tasks, with final dates, rather than a day-by-day detailed timeline.
  • To go on the timeline: Book flights, book accommodation, poster printing, starting lab, finishing lab, people's holidays, exam periods.
  • Data mining for Friday.
  • End date for new ideas this Friday.
  • Shortlisting next Wednesday. Make a page with all the projects, everyone give a rating: feasibility, novelty, wow factor, etc.
  • "Homework": draw lines between species that you think interact.