Team:Groningen/16 August 2010
From 2010.igem.org
(17 intermediate revisions not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Team:Groningen/Header}} | {{Team:Groningen/Header}} | ||
- | '''Week | + | '''Week 33''' |
+ | ---- | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
- | ''' | + | |
+ | '''David''' | ||
+ | |||
<br> | <br> | ||
- | + | ||
+ | '''THT Staining - Chaplin ladder''' | ||
+ | |||
<br> | <br> | ||
- | ''' | + | |
+ | '''THT reference''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | Making a reference of pure chaplins is of great importance when comparing results. For a reference 22 mg of extracted and freeze-dried celwalls of streptomyces were used. Chaplins from these cellwalls were then purified by TFA treatment. The monomerized chaplins were diluted in 1 ml demiwater. Then a variety of dilutions was made with demiwater. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Amount of diluted chaplin protein in a 250 ul sample (high concentration reference): | ||
+ | |||
<br> | <br> | ||
- | + | ||
+ | <pre> | ||
+ | 100% | ||
+ | 51,2% | ||
+ | 25,6% | ||
+ | 12,8% | ||
+ | 6,4% | ||
+ | 3,2% | ||
+ | 1,6% | ||
+ | 0,8% | ||
+ | 0,4% | ||
+ | Blanco(demi+THT staining) | ||
+ | demi water | ||
+ | </pre> | ||
+ | |||
<br> | <br> | ||
- | + | ||
+ | <pre> | ||
+ | Low concentration ladder: | ||
+ | 0,8% | ||
+ | 0,6% | ||
+ | 0,4% | ||
+ | 0,3% | ||
+ | 0,2% | ||
+ | blanco | ||
+ | demi | ||
+ | </pre> | ||
+ | |||
<br> | <br> | ||
- | '''Modellers:''' More literature research on ComXPA. ''Joël, Laura''. Researching parts registry for information which is required to build an information standard ''Arend'' | + | [[Image:THTLGR.jpg|400px]] |
+ | |||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''Expression experiment''' - '''David & Peter''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | The first expression experiment, testing all the constructs that were made so far. We tested for treated pellet and supernatant, untreated pellets were tested as well. | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''Exression experiment''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''Peter & David''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | For this experiment, the following B. subtilis 168 strains were used: | ||
+ | |||
+ | <pre> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | </pre> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | All cultures were grown overnight at 37 degrees Celsius in a shaker room. | ||
+ | |||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Overnight cultures were used to dilute to a B. subtilis culture of 0,1 OD, these strains were divided into ‘’induced’’ and ‘’non-induced’’. Induction with 0,5% subtilin was done at a OD of 0,5 (approximately 2,5 hours after growth of the 0,1 culture started). | ||
+ | |||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | After that the OD of the cultures was measured every .. hours. | ||
+ | |||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''Sample preperation''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | After .. hours, .. after induction, the samples were collected and processed. The following procedures were used: | ||
+ | |||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Pellet preperation ([[PelletPrepGR]]) | ||
+ | |||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Supernatant processing ([[SupernatantPrepGR]]) | ||
+ | |||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Cell disruption ([[ExtractionCellWallsGR]]) | ||
+ | |||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Lysozyme preperation ([[LysozymePrepGR]]) | ||
+ | |||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Analysis was done using SDS-PAGE ([[SDS-PAGEGR]]) and THT staining ([[THTstainingGR]]). | ||
+ | |||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''Results''': | ||
+ | |||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''Growth Curve''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[Image:GrowthCurveGR1.jpg|400px]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''THT Staining''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[Image:THTGR1.jpg|400px]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''SDS-PAGE''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[Image:SDS-PAGEGR1.jpg|400px]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | '''Geeske''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | Double gene constructs had to be made via pSB1C3 or pSB1K3. Produced the following constructs: pSB1C3_CH, pSB1C3_dCH, pSB1C3_dCS and pSB1C3_H, but no restriction check performed yet. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | '''Modellers:''' | ||
+ | More literature research on ComXPA. ''Joël, Laura''. | ||
+ | Researching parts registry for information which is required to build an information standard ''Arend'' Find information about a killswitch, start to model this process'' Laura'' | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | '''Jorrit''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | Done sticky end ligation for Ezgi. | ||
+ | Transformation with biofilm forming strains (Spo, Deg & Rok) according to [https://2010.igem.org/Team:Groningen/Protocols_for_Bacillus_subtilis_168 B. sub protocol]. | ||
+ | Also done transformation with NZ8900 and ΔTasA with empty vector. | ||
+ | no colonies were visible after 2 days for all 5 strains. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | '''Arend Jan''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Cleaned PCR product of the IS element removal attempt was blunt-end ligated. This is possible as the Phusion polymerase was used and it does not add A-overhangs to the product. PEG 4000 was added to the reaction which increases the efficiency of blunt end ligations. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | <pre>- 5ul plasmid | ||
+ | - 2ul 10X T4 buffer | ||
+ | - 2ul 50% PEG4000 | ||
+ | - 5ul T4 ligase | ||
+ | - 6ul MQ </pre> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | A small amount of colonies were observed after transformation. These were picked, grown, and plasmid DNA was isolated. A restriction with EcoRI and PstI revealed that the colonies had the original plasmid with the insert (gel not shown). Template DNA from the PCR must have caused this. Back to square one… | ||
+ | |||
{{Team:Groningen/Footer}} | {{Team:Groningen/Footer}} |
Latest revision as of 20:48, 27 October 2010
Week 33
David
THT Staining - Chaplin ladder
THT reference
Making a reference of pure chaplins is of great importance when comparing results. For a reference 22 mg of extracted and freeze-dried celwalls of streptomyces were used. Chaplins from these cellwalls were then purified by TFA treatment. The monomerized chaplins were diluted in 1 ml demiwater. Then a variety of dilutions was made with demiwater.
Amount of diluted chaplin protein in a 250 ul sample (high concentration reference):
100% 51,2% 25,6% 12,8% 6,4% 3,2% 1,6% 0,8% 0,4% Blanco(demi+THT staining) demi water
Low concentration ladder: 0,8% 0,6% 0,4% 0,3% 0,2% blanco demi
Expression experiment - David & Peter
The first expression experiment, testing all the constructs that were made so far. We tested for treated pellet and supernatant, untreated pellets were tested as well.
Exression experiment
Peter & David
For this experiment, the following B. subtilis 168 strains were used:
All cultures were grown overnight at 37 degrees Celsius in a shaker room.
Overnight cultures were used to dilute to a B. subtilis culture of 0,1 OD, these strains were divided into ‘’induced’’ and ‘’non-induced’’. Induction with 0,5% subtilin was done at a OD of 0,5 (approximately 2,5 hours after growth of the 0,1 culture started).
After that the OD of the cultures was measured every .. hours.
Sample preperation
After .. hours, .. after induction, the samples were collected and processed. The following procedures were used:
Pellet preperation (PelletPrepGR)
Supernatant processing (SupernatantPrepGR)
Cell disruption (ExtractionCellWallsGR)
Lysozyme preperation (LysozymePrepGR)
Analysis was done using SDS-PAGE (SDS-PAGEGR) and THT staining (THTstainingGR).
Results:
Growth Curve
THT Staining
SDS-PAGE
Geeske
Double gene constructs had to be made via pSB1C3 or pSB1K3. Produced the following constructs: pSB1C3_CH, pSB1C3_dCH, pSB1C3_dCS and pSB1C3_H, but no restriction check performed yet.
Modellers: More literature research on ComXPA. Joël, Laura. Researching parts registry for information which is required to build an information standard Arend Find information about a killswitch, start to model this process Laura
Jorrit
Done sticky end ligation for Ezgi. Transformation with biofilm forming strains (Spo, Deg & Rok) according to B. sub protocol. Also done transformation with NZ8900 and ΔTasA with empty vector. no colonies were visible after 2 days for all 5 strains.
Arend Jan
Cleaned PCR product of the IS element removal attempt was blunt-end ligated. This is possible as the Phusion polymerase was used and it does not add A-overhangs to the product. PEG 4000 was added to the reaction which increases the efficiency of blunt end ligations.
- 5ul plasmid - 2ul 10X T4 buffer - 2ul 50% PEG4000 - 5ul T4 ligase - 6ul MQ
A small amount of colonies were observed after transformation. These were picked, grown, and plasmid DNA was isolated. A restriction with EcoRI and PstI revealed that the colonies had the original plasmid with the insert (gel not shown). Template DNA from the PCR must have caused this. Back to square one…