Team:Newcastle/Spider silk
From 2010.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
RachelBoyd (Talk | contribs) |
RachelBoyd (Talk | contribs) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Team:Newcastle/mainbanner}} | {{Team:Newcastle/mainbanner}} | ||
+ | |||
+ | =Spider Silk= | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Background Info== | ||
{| | {| | ||
|- | |- | ||
- | |||
- | |||
|'''World’s strongest spider silk''' comes from species of the genus ''Nephila'' | |'''World’s strongest spider silk''' comes from species of the genus ''Nephila'' | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 19: | Line 21: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|[[Image:Spider Web.jpg]][[Image:Golden orb web.jpg]] | |[[Image:Spider Web.jpg]][[Image:Golden orb web.jpg]] | ||
+ | |} | ||
+ | ==Major Ampulate Spidroin Proteins== | ||
+ | {| | ||
|- | |- | ||
|'''Spider silk''' is comparable in strength to carbon fibres | |'''Spider silk''' is comparable in strength to carbon fibres | ||
Line 62: | Line 67: | ||
|''B.subtilis'' potential host as simple secretion system compared to yeast. Secretion has advantages over expression in ''E.coli'' however; insufficient proportion of protein was secreted by yeast. | |''B.subtilis'' potential host as simple secretion system compared to yeast. Secretion has advantages over expression in ''E.coli'' however; insufficient proportion of protein was secreted by yeast. | ||
|- | |- | ||
- | | '''Fahnestock, S. R., Yao, Z., & Bedzyk, L. a. (2000). Microbial production of spider silk | + | | '''Fahnestock, S. R., Yao, Z., & Bedzyk, L. a. (2000). Microbial production of spider silk pr}oteins. Journal of biotechnology, 74(2), 105-19. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11763501.''' |
+ | |} | ||
+ | ==Self Assembly and pH== | ||
+ | {| | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |Self assembly of Spider silk proteins is controlled by a pH sensitive relay. | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |A drop to pH 6.3 and shearing forces are believes to result in the hard form of spider silk. | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |Miniature spidroins (a few repeats 4repCT) form metre long fibres irrespective of pH. | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |Introduction of N-terminal domain from MASP1 (''Euprosthenops australis'') | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |to mini spidroins allows self assembly at pH 6.3 and delays aggregation above pH7. | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |Relay- like mechanism N terminal regulates assembly. pH 8 NT-mini spidroins for long firbes over days at pH 6 they form rapidly. | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |C-terminal domain promotes Silk formation by ordering the repetitive segments. | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |'''Askarieh, G. et al., 2010. Self-assembly of spider silk proteins is controlled by a pH-sensitive relay. Nature, 465(7295), 236-238. Available at: http://www.nature.com/doifinder/10.1038/nature08962.''' | ||
+ | |} |
Revision as of 11:33, 12 June 2010
|
Contents |
Spider Silk
Background Info
Major Ampulate Spidroin Proteins
Spider silk is comparable in strength to carbon fibres |
Highly structured at the nanometre scale – not good for synthetic materials |
Repetitive structures- GXG motif |
Glycine rich segments – hard and soft segments alternating |
Hard= hydrogen bonding cross-linked crystallites (polyalanine) forming an amorphic beta sheet structure, |
Soft= flexibility (Glycine rich) |
Major protein from Nephila clavipes – MaSP1 tandem variants of |
A GQG GYG GLG SQG A GRG GLG GQG A GA6GGx |
MaSP2 also has a repetitive structure – difference soft segment contains proline containing pentamers: The consensus repeat is _GPGGY GPGQQ.3GPSGPGS A8. Similar structure to Elastin – elastic properties of drag-line by the folding of pentamer structure. |
In the spider – silk in 3 phases |
1) Extremely viscous (withstand shear forces inside spider), |
2) Liquid crystallite lower viscosity (near exit duct/glycine rich may be involved), |
3) Insoluble fibre (result of dehydration and drawing). |
MaSP1 and MaSP2 – Drag line |
MaSP1-Auxilary |
MaSP2- Glue silk only |
Neither- Cocoon silk |
Super contraction associated with pentamer motif when wet: low visco-elasticity |
Mimic natural proteins or simplify – Mimic structural significance still uncertain for some sequences |
DPB1- Optimised for B.subtilis |
B.subtilis potential host as simple secretion system compared to yeast. Secretion has advantages over expression in E.coli however; insufficient proportion of protein was secreted by yeast. |
Fahnestock, S. R., Yao, Z., & Bedzyk, L. a. (2000). Microbial production of spider silk pr}oteins. Journal of biotechnology, 74(2), 105-19. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11763501. |
Self Assembly and pH
Self assembly of Spider silk proteins is controlled by a pH sensitive relay. |
A drop to pH 6.3 and shearing forces are believes to result in the hard form of spider silk. |
Miniature spidroins (a few repeats 4repCT) form metre long fibres irrespective of pH. |
Introduction of N-terminal domain from MASP1 (Euprosthenops australis) |
to mini spidroins allows self assembly at pH 6.3 and delays aggregation above pH7. |
Relay- like mechanism N terminal regulates assembly. pH 8 NT-mini spidroins for long firbes over days at pH 6 they form rapidly. |
C-terminal domain promotes Silk formation by ordering the repetitive segments. |
Askarieh, G. et al., 2010. Self-assembly of spider silk proteins is controlled by a pH-sensitive relay. Nature, 465(7295), 236-238. Available at: http://www.nature.com/doifinder/10.1038/nature08962. |