Team:UPO-Sevilla/Biobricks/Devices
From 2010.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
Line 77: | Line 77: | ||
<img class="device" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/5/5e/BacterialCrowdingDevice16.png" alt="Bacterial Crowding Device 16"/> | <img class="device" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/5/5e/BacterialCrowdingDevice16.png" alt="Bacterial Crowding Device 16"/> | ||
<p><strong>Notes:</strong></p> | <p><strong>Notes:</strong></p> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <a class="return_button" href="/Team:UPO-Sevilla/Biobricks" title="Biobricks"><span>Return to Biobricks</span></a> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <div class="clear"></div> | ||
+ | |||
</div> | </div> |
Revision as of 15:34, 14 September 2010
Devices
Device 1. Type: protein generator
Notes:
Device 2. Type: protein generator
Notes: We decided not to build this divice due to the fact that it already exists in E. coli K12 strain.
Device 3. Type: protein generator
Notes:
Device 4. Type: protein generator
Notes:
Device 5. Type: reporter
Notes:
Device 6. Type: reporter
Notes:
Device 7. Type: Protein generator/Signal sender
Notes:
Device 8. Type: Protein generator/Signal sender
Notes:
Device 9. Type: Protein generator/Signal sender
Notes:
Device 10. Type: Protein generator/Signal sender
Notes: Finally we chose aspartate like the best attractant for E. coli. This is why Glutamate Synthase divices were not going to continue building.
Device 11. Type: Protein generator/Signal sender
Notes: Finally we chose aspartate like the best attractant for E. coli. This is why Glutamate Synthase divices were not going to continue building.
Device 12. Type: Protein generator/Signal sender
Notes: Finally we chose aspartate like the best attractant for E. coli. This is why Glutamate Synthase divices were not going to continue building.
Device 13. Type: Protein generator/Signal sender
Notes:
Device 14. Type: Protein generator/Signal sender
Notes:
Device 15. Type: Protein generator/Signal sender
Notes:
Device 16. Type: Constitutive protein generator/reporter
Notes:
Return to Biobricks