Theory

In this section we will review the theory behind our biological work.

Phototaxis

Bacterial flagellar motility

Bacteria have evolved many modes of propulsion for the microscale environments they inhabit. At these scales materials behave very differently than at the macro-scale, and of particular interest to us is the way liquids seem more viscous[1]. One of the many ways bacteria move around in liquids, is by means of flagella. A single flagellum is a thin filament around 100-150 Å thick, that extends many cell lengths out from the cell[2]. It consist mainly of flaggelin subunits that assemble into a helical structure forming a long hollow cylindrical filament[3]. In E. coli the mean number of flagella per cell is 4[4], but there is a wide variance between strains, and even between individual cells of each strain. The environment around the cell also has a large influence on how many flagellae are pressent, or if they are pressent at all[4] Flagella rotate to generate force that allows bacterial cells to swim through fluids in characteristic patterns, more on which later, in search of better conditions for proliferation or survival[5]. Normally flagellated strains of E. coli can achieve speeds up to 20µm/sec[4], and considdering a cell length of only 1-2µm this is an impressive feat indeed.

A flagellum is anchored to the cell body by a large, wheel-like protein complex spanning both inner and outer membranes[4], through which the subunits are secreted to the tip of the flagellar tube[3], thus elongating the filament. (This mechanism is slightly different in archaea, where the filament is assembled from the base of the flagellum) The membrane anchor also functions as a rotary engine, driven by the proton motive force[4. In E. coli the flagellar motor rotates at up to 300hz and can turn either clockwise or counter-clockwise[4], both resulting in a distinct movement pattern for the cell.

Spinning in the counter-clockwise direction, the flagella will twist into a bundle in the shape of a corkscrew, and create a linear driving force[4], propelling the cell in a straight line through the liquid. This form of movement is termed run. Spun in the clockwise direction one might then expect the cell to reverse, but this is not the case. Instead the flagellar bundle will unwind and each flagellum will flail wildly, creating chaotic movement[4], . This movement reorients the cell randomly and is termed tumbling. A cell will typically run for some time, then change it’s orientation by tumbling, and then run again[5]. The direction of flagella rotation is controlled by binding of a cytosolic protein CheY, more on which later[4].

Different taxis pathways that steer cells towards favorable conditions and away from danger work by regulating the frequency of tumbling events[5]. We can take an example where a cell is getting close to a toxin it can sense and react to. As it gets closer to the source of the toxin, intracellular pathways will increase the frequency of tumbling events, in effect preventing the cell from rushing into certain doom, and since the frequency of tumbling events will decrease if the cell is going in a direction away from the toxin, it will ”encourage” the cell to continue in that direction. In the case of an attractant such as an increase in nutrient concentration, the pattern will be oppisite, so that the cell is encouraged to continue towards the source of the attractant. This form of movement, combining tumbling and running, with regulation of the tumbling frequency is termed a biased random walk[5].

A biased random walk motion pattern.

To understand how this can work we need a simplified understanding of the chemotaxis pathway at a molecular level. Chemotactic receptors can both increase and decrease tumbling frequencies to generate biased random walk behaviour. Increased tumbling is achieved through a phosphorylation cascade beginning with the binding of a repelant to a transmembrane receptor. The receptor is linked to two proteins CheW and CheA. CheA is a histidine-kinase that will autophosphorylate when the repelant binds. The phosphoryl group is then transfered to CheY activating the protein. The flagellar has high affinity for CheY-p, and binding reverses the mode of movement from run to tumbling. CheY-P is continuosly dephosphorylated back to CheY by CheZ which is present in the cytosol. A receptor sensing an attractant might instead switch from a default active CheA state to an inactive state when it’s ligand is bound, thus decreasing CheY phosphorylation[4].

Photosensor

In our system we want to be able to control the amount of flow in the channel through a remote signal. The signal we have chosen is light since we want to avoid altering the chemical composition of the fluid running through the channel. Having looked at previous iGEM work on light sensitive systems which have all been focused on transcriptional regulation, we realised that we would need a different approach for the fast response times our system requires. We have therefore focused our work on proteorhodopsins that integrate into the chemotaxis pathway, giving us very fast response to light stimulation.

Our construct centers around a synthetic protein created by Spudich et. al. It consists of an archaeal proteorhodopsin SRII (Sensory Rhodopsin II) and it’s transducer protein htrII from Natronomonas pharaonis coupled to a tar domain from a transmembrane receptor from Salmonella enterica. The tar domain is the part of the receptor that couples with CheA and CheW, and although it is taken from a different species, it has been shown to work in E. coli as well. In the construct we are working with light acts as an attractant, reducing the tumbling rate upon illumination (see picture). This might help us to control our pumping power, by decreasing the fraction of bacteria tumbling in the channel by increasing light stimulus, thus promoting linear drive. The photosensor should be most active in light with a wavelength of about 500nm, according to the original article. We have used DNA sent to us from the original authors to isolate the coding sequence for the protein generator.

Note that although the bacteria will be stationary in our system, since they are glued to the inner surface of the flowchannel, our construct in reality confers phototactic ability to E. coli.

A. The SRII rhodopsin has not yet been activated. Note that CheA is active by default, continuosly autophosphorylating itself, and cycling back to it's unphosphorylated state by transfering the phosphoryl group to CheY. High levels of CheY-P will induce tumbling motion in the flagella. Note also that CheZ continuously dephosphorylates CheY.
B. SRII is now hit with a photon, causing conformational change of the entire complex, and shutting of CheA. The Inactivation of CheA halts production of CheY-P, and CheZ rapidly dephosphorylates the remaining CheY-P, resulting in a reduced frequency of tumbling.

BioBrick design

Retinal coding biobrick: K343001 Retinal composite part: K343006

Retinal Generator

Retinal requirements of light-sensing proteins

Proteorhodopsins and other related light-sensing proteins such as the rhodopsins found in human retinal pigment often require a supply of retinal to function. In fact retinal is the molecule responsible for the initial activation, as it undergoes photoizomerization after being struck by a photon. It is this change in conformation of the retinal molecule that is relayed through the entire rhodopsin-transducer complex to activate/deactivate the CheW/A complex in the cytosol. Thus either an external supply of retinal or an internal supply of genes coding for enzymes in the retinal biosynthesis pathway are required, if we wish to se phototactic behaviour in our cells.

Many plants and microbes have complete retinal biosynthesis pathways integrated into their genomes, to help drive their rhodopsins. In these organisms rhodopsins play an essential role, not only in photosensation but also directly in energy production, in fact in some organisms rhodopsins are used to create proton motive force directly by pumping protons out into the extracellular space using light energy to drive the process. Humans and other animals on the other hand often only have enzymes coding for the final steps of the pathway, more on which later. They rely on a supply of retinal precursors or Vitamin A (a group consisting of retinal and it's metabolites) in their diet. This is why Vitamin A defficiency causes night-blindness as an early symptom in humans.

Retinal biosynthesis

Retinal is synthesised from the enzymatic cleavage of some carotenes. In our system we focus on cleavage of beta-carotene, partly because it yields 2 all-trans retinal molecules which is the molecule we desire, and partly because the beta-carotene biosynthesis pathway has been introduced to E. coli already by the Cambridge 2009 iGEM team.

The Cambridge 2009 construct consists of four genes crtE, crtB, crtI and crtY from P. ananatis that together make up the pathway that converts farnesyl pyrophosphate to beta-carotene, which is a precursor for retinal. farnesyl pyrophosphate is naturally pressent in E. coli.

• crtE encodes the protein geranyl-geranyl pyrophosphate synthase that converts farnesyl pyrophosphate to geranyl-geranyl pyrophosphate by elongating it by one unit of isopentenyl.
• crtB encodes the protein phytoene synthase and synthesizes phytoene by putting together two molecules of geranyl-geranyl pyrophosphate whilst cutting off 2 molecules of pyrophosphate.
• crtI encodes the protein phytoene dehydrogenase and converts phytoene to lycopene by converting the trans bond to a cis bond and adding more cis double bonds.
• crtY encodes the protein lycopene B-cyclase and converts lycopene to beta-carotene.

The pathway (including the step that generates retinal) is summed up below:

To introduce the final step from beta-carotene to retinal, we use the gene ninaB from D. melanogaster. This gene encodes the protein beta-carotene 15,15’-monooxygenase, which cleaves beta-carotene to produce two molecules of retinal under the consumption of oxygen.
We have inserted the part K343006 into a different plasmid from the K274210 part since both parts are very long, so a plasmid containing both wouldn't have been viable.

Characterizing the retinal BioBrick

We characterized our BioBrick using two methods: Photospectrometry and high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). While characterizing our own construct, we simultaneously characterized the Cambridge part, K274210 seeing as we wish to find out if the two parts work in concert.

Seeing as both beta-carotene and retinal have unique and characteristic spectres when studied by UV-vis spectrometry, this is a good place to start. The spectra can be obtained by harvesting beta-carotene- and retinal-producing cells, resuspending them in acetone and lysing them, which we chose to do by sonication. Afterwards, the cell debris can be pelleted and the supernatant can be examinated.

The acetone suspension of beta-carotene and retinal can then be subjected to photospectrometry, and the obtained values and spectra can be compared to those of pure beta-carotene or retinal in known concentrations. This method provides both a qualitative answer to whether or not the desired compound is present and a qualitative indication of the concentration in the cells.

This is the method by which the Cambridge team characterized their beta-carotene-generating BioBrick in 2009.

Apart from photospectrometry, the resuspension of beta-carotene or retinal in acetone can be subjected to analysis by HPLC. HPLC can be used to separate retinal from beta-carotene, to get a better indication of whether or not our retinal-generating part actually produces retinal from beta-carotene. In the experiments we used these protocols
See our results here.

BioBrick design

Retinal coding biobrick: [http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_K343001 K343001 ]
Retinal composite part: [http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_K343006 K343006]

Further use of the retinal BioBrick

Role in light-based signal transduction

Since retinal plays such an essential role in photosensing in both eukaryotes as well as bacteria and archaea, all work with rhodopsins and proteorhodopsins will need a retinal supply to function. This supply might come from the external environment, but it is an appealing thought that we might be able to supply the retinal from an internal source. Our project centers around phototaxis, but other constructs combining photorhodopsins with other membrane associated tyrosine kinases may also be imagined, opening vast posibilities for regulation of phopsphorylation cascades using light as input. In such systems, retinal biosynthesis could play a very valuable role.

Hyperflagellation

Background

Motility can be very beneficial quality for a microorganism. Evolution has therefore provided bacteria with two general means of transportation; the flagella and the pili. These qualities allow the bacteria to move away from a hostile environment and towards more favorable conditions. Flaggella and pili are however viewed as a virulence factor as they serve as an advantage in colonizing a host organism and yet they can cause a strong immune response (Josenhans).

Many organisms are able to synthesize a flagellum, if the external environment calls for it. The synthesis of a flagellum is a huge and energy consuming process and is therefore tightly regulated by the bacteria’s external environment. One of the most well characterized flagellation systems is the one found in E. coli. Here at least 50 genes are involved in the hierarchal synthesis and the operation of the flagella. These genes are sorted into 15 operons which are expressed in a three-level transcriptional cascade separated into three classes. Class I consists of the master operon flhDC. The active FlhDC protein is hexamer organized into an FlhD₄C₂ complex with a computed value of 96,4kDa (Wang). The homodimeric FlhC protein is able to bind DNA, while the FlhD homodimer is not. The formation of the FlhDC complex however, stabilizes and increases the DNA binding ability (Claret). The transcription of flhDC is heavily regulated by nutritional and environmental conditions. Flagellum synthesis is inhibited in at high temperatures, at high salt concentrations, at extreme pH or in the presence of carbohydrates, low molecular alcohols or DNA gyrase inhibitors, as these conditions stimulated growth as opposed to motility (Li). Because the flagellum synthesis is so energy consuming, the process is not started unless the environment calls for motility rather than growth. In fact, in situations where nutrition is plenty over a long period, the bacteria will focus on growth and over time lose the ability to synthesize the flagellum, as seen with the E. coli strain Mg1655 localized in mouse intestines (Gauger).



The FlhD₄C₂ hexamer acts as a transcription factor for the Class II genes, which encodes the basal body, that is embedded in the cell membrane as well as hook proteins, which are transported to the cell exterior through the basal body. Another Class II gene is the σ²⁸ transcription factor, which is responsible for the transcription of the Class III genes. This includes fliC, which encodes the flagellin subunit that composes the flagella “tail”. To ensure the Class III genes are not transcribed before the assembly of the basal body and the hook is complete another Class II protein FliM acts as an anti-sigma factor and bind σ²⁸, thereby preventing the transcription of fliC.

Hyperflagellation – need article…

Our system

As we try to create a microflow in our system using flagella, we want to increase the flow created by a single bacteria by increasing the number of flagella on the bacteria. However, inducing flagellation in a wildtype E. coli strain requires too much of the bacterial environment. In order to avoid the tight control of the flhDC operon, we insert it into a plasmid backbone containing a constitutive active promoter. As we bypass the original regulations and continuously express the master regulon of the flagellum cascade we hope to see a significant difference in motility of the cells containing our composite part.
As E. coli already express the flhDC operon, we isolate this coding sequence by purifying genomic DNA from the E. coli Mg1655 strain and then amplify the operon using PCR with specially designed primers, before assembly and the insertion into the plasmid backbone
Furthermore, it will be interesting to see whether the overexpression of the flhDC operon will have an effect on the bacterial growth.

Biobrick design

FlhD,C mutated coding sequence: [http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_K343000 K343000 ]
FlhDC composite part: [http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_K343004 K343004]

References

[1] Li T-D, Gao J, Szoszkiewicz R, Landman U, Riedo E, [http://prb.aps.org/abstract/PRB/v75/i11/e115415 Structured and viscous water in subnanometer gaps],Phys. Rev. B 75, 115415 (2007)
[2] Samatey FA, et. al.,[http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v410/n6826/abs/410331a0.html Structure of the bacterial flagellar protofilament and implications for a switch for supercoiling]Nature 410, 331-337 (15 March 2001)
[3] Macnab RM, [http://www.annualreviews.org/doi/full/10.1146/annurev.micro.57.030502.090832?select23=Choose How bacteria assemble flagella]Annual Review of Microbiology Vol. 57: 77-100 (October 2003)
[4] Berg HC, [http://www.annualreviews.org/eprint/cDJrS190m62mDRwHrlp9/full/10.1146/annurev.biochem.72.121801.161737 The rotary motor of bacterial flagella],Annual Review of Biochemistry Vol. 72: 19-54 (July 2003)
[5] Berg HC, [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1098551 Chemotaxis in bacteria] Annu Rev Biophys Bioeng. 1975;4(00):119-36.
[6] Josenhans, C. and Suerbaum, S. (2002) [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12008914 The role of motility as a virulence factor in bacteria.] Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 291, 605^614
[7] Wang, S. et al. (2006) [http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=MImg&_imagekey=B6WK7-4HMGKJ0-D-H&_cdi=6899&_user=644074&_pii=S0022283605014063&_origin=search&_coverDate=01%2F27%2F2006&_sk=996449995&view=c&wchp=dGLzVzz-zSkzS&md5=6454221c64ea21917221df6a2bcfaaaa&ie=/sdarticle.pdf Structure of the Escherichia coli FlhDC Complex, a Prokaryotic Heteromeric Regulator of Transcription.] Journ. of mol. Biol. 355, 4, 798-808

</div>