"
Team:Chiba
From 2010.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
width:100%; | width:100%; | ||
background:#373737; | background:#373737; | ||
| + | font: Arial; | ||
font-size:100%; | font-size:100%; | ||
line-height:normal; | line-height:normal; | ||
| Line 35: | Line 36: | ||
} | } | ||
#tabsE ul { | #tabsE ul { | ||
| + | font: Arial; | ||
margin:0; | margin:0; | ||
padding:2px 10px 0 20px; | padding:2px 10px 0 20px; | ||
| Line 40: | Line 42: | ||
} | } | ||
#tabsE li { | #tabsE li { | ||
| + | font: Arial; | ||
float:left; | float:left; | ||
display:inline; | display:inline; | ||
| Line 47: | Line 50: | ||
} | } | ||
#tabsE li ul { | #tabsE li ul { | ||
| + | font: Arial; | ||
position: absolute; | position: absolute; | ||
left: -999em; | left: -999em; | ||
| Line 52: | Line 56: | ||
#tabsE li:hover ul { | #tabsE li:hover ul { | ||
| + | font: Arial; | ||
float:left; | float:left; | ||
color: white !important; | color: white !important; | ||
| Line 58: | Line 63: | ||
#tabsE li:hover ul, #tabsE li.sfhover ul { | #tabsE li:hover ul, #tabsE li.sfhover ul { | ||
| + | font: Arial; | ||
left:auto; | left:auto; | ||
padding: 10px; | padding: 10px; | ||
| Line 64: | Line 70: | ||
#tabsE a { | #tabsE a { | ||
| + | font: Arial; | ||
float:left; | float:left; | ||
background:url("tableftE.gif") no-repeat left top; | background:url("tableftE.gif") no-repeat left top; | ||
| Line 71: | Line 78: | ||
} | } | ||
#tabsE a span { | #tabsE a span { | ||
| + | font: Arial; | ||
float:left; | float:left; | ||
display:block; | display:block; | ||
Revision as of 09:35, 24 October 2010
|
 |
| PROJECT DESCPIRTION We daily double-click the icons to open the files or to exert the program: this is clearly distinguished from the single click, which is often for selecting or highlighting the program. This year, iGEM CHIBA is constructing genetic double-click system whose output is released only when the input (inducing agent) is given twice within a limited time. To discriminate double-click from two separated single-clicks, the 1st input is to be memorized temporarily. If the 2nd input is added before the memory gets lost, output will be produced. If the 2nd input is not added within the given time, the system will be reset to the original state. This mechanism could work as a sort of safety device; by requiring the 2nd ‘confirmation’ input, one can drastically reduce, or even eliminate, the frequency of false-inputs. This system could be useful in operating the potent or potentially-hazardous biochemical processes. |
 |
