Team:Uppsala-SwedenWeek9

From 2010.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
(Identification of Bio-bricks)
(Identification of Bio-bricks)
Line 20: Line 20:
As the first PCR didn't show the length of all biobricks, the samples failed last time were sent to run another c-PCR. The result was showed in Fig.1
As the first PCR didn't show the length of all biobricks, the samples failed last time were sent to run another c-PCR. The result was showed in Fig.1
-
[[Image:20100803BBCOMFIRM thumb.jpg|2000px|thumb|border|Figure 1]]
+
[[Image:20100803BBCOMFIRM thumb.jpg|2000px|center|border|Figure 1]]

Revision as of 13:18, 24 October 2010

Week-9

Identification of Bio-bricks

Plasmid of the samples which showed right size band on the gel were sent to a plasmid concentration test. We decided only F2, F6, F7, F8, F15 and F16 were in good concentration to proceed.

Sample A[260] A[280] Bg[320] Ratio Protein (μg/ml) Nucleic Acid (μg/ml) f2 0,0946 0,0607 0,0202 f3 0,0444 0,0346 0,0216 1,7474 2,9830 0,9640 f6 0,0844 0,0669 0,0300 1,4721 16,1731 2,0934 f7 0,1348 0,1020 0,0557 1,7074 11,9965 3,3075 f8 0,0905 0,0690 0,0420 1,7961 5,1758 2,0767 f11 0,0332 0,0261 0,0184 1,9261 0,7189 0,6559 f15 0,0769 0,0511 0,0205 1,8439 4,7573 2,4456 f 16 0,0543 0,0389 0,0223 1,9290 1,5147 1,4182


As the first PCR didn't show the length of all biobricks, the samples failed last time were sent to run another c-PCR. The result was showed in Fig.1

Figure 1