Team:UNIPV-Pavia/Material Methods/Measurements/Tecan/test27agosto

From 2010.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
(RESULTS (?))
(RESULTS)
 
(5 intermediate revisions not shown)
Line 11: Line 11:
<td valign="top">
<td valign="top">
<table border="0" align="center" width="100%"><tr><td align="justify" valign="top" style="padding:20px">
<table border="0" align="center" width="100%"><tr><td align="justify" valign="top" style="padding:20px">
-
<html><p align="center"><font size="5"><b>15° TEST</b></font><br><br><font size="4">[AUGUST, 27TH]</font></p></html><hr><br>
+
<html><p align="center"><font size="5"><b>AUGUST, 27TH</b></font></p></html><hr><br>
==PLATE==
==PLATE==
<br>
<br>
Line 37: Line 37:
==RESULTS==
==RESULTS==
<br>
<br>
-
[[Image:UNIPV_Pavia_risHCLB.bmp| 620px | center ]]
+
[[Image:UNIPV_Pavia_risHCLB.png| 620px | center ]]
<br>
<br>
 +
It is possible to split the promoters into 3 groups: strong promoters (<partinfo>BBa_J23100</partinfo> and <partinfo>BBa_J23101</partinfo>), medium strength promoters(<partinfo>BBa_J23118</partinfo> and <partinfo>BBa_J23110</partinfo>) and  weak promoters (the other ones). It is notable that <partinfo>BBa_J23110</partinfo> resulted stronger than <partinfo>BBa_J23118</partinfo>.
 +
 +
{| border='1' align='center'
 +
|| Promoter || R.P.U. (average) || std
 +
|-
 +
|| <partinfo>BBa_J23100</partinfo> || 0.989 || 0.025
 +
|-
 +
|| <partinfo>BBa_J23101</partinfo> || 1 || -
 +
|-
 +
|| <partinfo>BBa_J23105</partinfo> || 0.071 || 0.004
 +
|-
 +
|| <partinfo>BBa_J23106</partinfo> || 0.122 || 0.008
 +
|-
 +
|| <partinfo>BBa_J23110</partinfo> || 0.583 || 0.016
 +
|-
 +
|| <partinfo>BBa_J23114</partinfo> || 0.037 || 0.006
 +
|-
 +
|| <partinfo>BBa_J23116</partinfo> || 0.043 || 0.009
 +
|-
 +
|| <partinfo>BBa_J23118</partinfo> || 0.341 || 0.009
 +
|}
<!-- table previous next test -->
<!-- table previous next test -->

Latest revision as of 08:42, 23 October 2010

AUGUST, 27TH



PLATE


UNIPV Pavia piastra27agosto2.png


EXPERIMENT DESCRIPTION

Motivation

This experiment was performed in LB to check bacterial growth and RFP rate synthesis in order to evaluate the R.P.U. (see Protocol) of the promoters from Anderson's collection in high copy number plasmids.

Methods

Accordign to Protocol 2 the experiment was performed in LB on the following parts:

  • <partinfo>BBa_J23100</partinfo>
  • <partinfo>BBa_J23101</partinfo>
  • <partinfo>BBa_J23105</partinfo>
  • <partinfo>BBa_J23106</partinfo>
  • <partinfo>BBa_J23110</partinfo>
  • <partinfo>BBa_J23114</partinfo>
  • <partinfo>BBa_J23116</partinfo>
  • <partinfo>BBa_J23118</partinfo>
  • <partinfo>BBa_B0031</partinfo> (negative control)

RESULTS


UNIPV Pavia risHCLB.png


It is possible to split the promoters into 3 groups: strong promoters (<partinfo>BBa_J23100</partinfo> and <partinfo>BBa_J23101</partinfo>), medium strength promoters(<partinfo>BBa_J23118</partinfo> and <partinfo>BBa_J23110</partinfo>) and weak promoters (the other ones). It is notable that <partinfo>BBa_J23110</partinfo> resulted stronger than <partinfo>BBa_J23118</partinfo>.

Promoter R.P.U. (average) std
<partinfo>BBa_J23100</partinfo> 0.989 0.025
<partinfo>BBa_J23101</partinfo> 1 -
<partinfo>BBa_J23105</partinfo> 0.071 0.004
<partinfo>BBa_J23106</partinfo> 0.122 0.008
<partinfo>BBa_J23110</partinfo> 0.583 0.016
<partinfo>BBa_J23114</partinfo> 0.037 0.006
<partinfo>BBa_J23116</partinfo> 0.043 0.009
<partinfo>BBa_J23118</partinfo> 0.341 0.009



Tecan Test