Team:Heidelberg/Project/miRNA Kit

From 2010.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
(Introduction)
Line 23: Line 23:
==Introduction==
==Introduction==
==Introduction==
==Introduction==
-
MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are endogenous 22-nt long non-coding RNAs that regulate gene expression post-transcriptionally in a diversity of organisms (Bartel, 2004). Although the understanding of miRNA biological functions is progressing remarkably, the exact mechanisms by which miRNAs regulate gene expression are still not unambiguously defined. However, it is commonly believed that miRNAs '''trigger target mRNA regulation''' by binding to 3’UTRs (Chekuleva & Filipowicz, 2009). The discovery of the first miRNA (lin-4) revealed sequence complementarity to multiple conserved sites in the 3’UTR of the lin-14 mRNA (Lee et al., 1993; Wightman et al., 1993). Exact principles of gene expression knockdown mediated by miRNA are still in debate (Eulalio et al., 2008). Binding site properties have an essential impact on miRNA-mRNA interaction. Rational design of binding sites could thereby help to achieve a narrow range of knockdown. The applicability is still limited by redundant target sites and various miRNA expression patterns within the cells which are hardly to measure. The experimental identification and/or validation of miRNA targets by means of proteomic or transcriptomic studies, reporter gene assays or overexpression/knock-down analysis is necessary to understand the biological relevance of the miRNA/mRNA interaction. Although progressively improving, even the reliability of <i>in silico</i> target prediction tools is still far away from being precise.  
+
MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are endogenous 22-nt long non-coding RNAs that regulate gene expression post-transcriptionally in a diversity of organisms (Bartel, 2004). Although the understanding of miRNA biological functions is progressing remarkably, the exact mechanisms by which miRNAs regulate gene expression are still not unambiguously defined. However, it is commonly believed that miRNAs '''trigger target mRNA regulation''' by binding to 3’UTRs (Chekuleva & Filipowicz, 2009). The discovery of the first miRNA (lin-4) revealed sequence complementarity to multiple conserved sites in the 3’UTR of the lin-14 mRNA (Lee et al., 1993; Wightman et al., 1993). Exact principles of gene expression knockdown mediated by miRNA are still in debate (Eulalio et al., 2008). <br/> '''Binding site properties''' have an essential impact on miRNA-mRNA interaction. Rational design of binding sites could thereby help to achieve a narrow range of knockdown. The applicability is still limited by redundant target sites and various miRNA expression patterns within the cells which are hardly to measure. The experimental identification and/or validation of miRNA targets by means of proteomic or transcriptomic studies, reporter gene assays or overexpression/knock-down analysis is necessary to understand the biological relevance of the miRNA/mRNA interaction. Although progressively improving, even the reliability of <i>in silico</i> target prediction tools is still far away from being precise.
-
 
+
==Results==
==Results==

Revision as of 11:24, 24 October 2010

Synthetic miRNA Kit

Abstract

Introduction

Introduction

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are endogenous 22-nt long non-coding RNAs that regulate gene expression post-transcriptionally in a diversity of organisms (Bartel, 2004). Although the understanding of miRNA biological functions is progressing remarkably, the exact mechanisms by which miRNAs regulate gene expression are still not unambiguously defined. However, it is commonly believed that miRNAs trigger target mRNA regulation by binding to 3’UTRs (Chekuleva & Filipowicz, 2009). The discovery of the first miRNA (lin-4) revealed sequence complementarity to multiple conserved sites in the 3’UTR of the lin-14 mRNA (Lee et al., 1993; Wightman et al., 1993). Exact principles of gene expression knockdown mediated by miRNA are still in debate (Eulalio et al., 2008).
Binding site properties have an essential impact on miRNA-mRNA interaction. Rational design of binding sites could thereby help to achieve a narrow range of knockdown. The applicability is still limited by redundant target sites and various miRNA expression patterns within the cells which are hardly to measure. The experimental identification and/or validation of miRNA targets by means of proteomic or transcriptomic studies, reporter gene assays or overexpression/knock-down analysis is necessary to understand the biological relevance of the miRNA/mRNA interaction. Although progressively improving, even the reliability of in silico target prediction tools is still far away from being precise.

Results

Discussion

Methods

Dual Luciferase assay

We measured the knockdown of firefly luciferase using the Promega Dual Luciferase Reporter Assay. The DLR™ Assay System provides an efficient mean of performing dual-reporter assays, where the activities of firefly (Photinus pyralis) and Renilla (Renilla reniformis) luciferases (RL) are measured sequentially from a single sample. Firefly and Renilla luciferases can be used as a good reporter system, as those two enzymes have dissimilar enzyme structures and substrate requirements. This allows for selective discrimination between their bioluminescent reactions. The firefly luciferase (FL) reporter is measured first by adding Luciferase Assay Reagent II (LAR II) to generate a stabilized luminescent signal. After quantifying the firefly luminescence, this reaction is quenched, and the Renilla luciferase reaction is simultaneously initiated by adding Stop & Glo® Reagent to the same tube. The Stop & Glo® Reagent also produces a stabilized signal from the Renilla luciferase, which decays slowly over the course of the measurement. Here, Renilla luciferase is used for normalization. The measurements were conducted on the Promega GLOMAX 96 Microplate Luminometer using the Promega standard protocol. Twenty hours after transfection, cells were washed with 1x PBS and lysed using 1x Passive Lysis Buffer (5x stock solution diluted with distilled water), shaking for 30 minutes at 37°C. 10µl of the lysate were transferred to a white microplate (LumaPlate) as required for Luminometer measurements.

LAR II reagent was prepared by resuspending Luciferase Assay Substrate in 10ml Luciferase Assay Buffer II. For Stop & Glo reagent, 2.1ml 50x Stop & Glo substrate and 105ml Stop & Glo Buffer were added to the amber Stop & Glo reagent bottle and mixed by vortexing. Reagents where stored in 15ml aliquots at -80°C and thawed freshly prior to each measurement.

To set up the Luminometer, the two injectors where flushed with distilled water, 70% ethanol, again water and air, three times each. Afterwards, they were primed three times with substrate reagents.

The activity of the first luciferase (firefly) was measured by adding 25µl of LAR II reagent to the well. The enzyme reacts upon translation without further processing and oxidates beetle luciferin, resulting in photon emission that can be measured. In addition to beetle luciferin, the LAR II reagent contains coenzyme A, which accelerates the reaction and thus creates a prolonged luminescence signal. The luminescence was measured two seconds after addition of the reagent, for ten seconds. Afterwards, 25µl Stop & Glo reagent was added, which is able to quench the firefly luciferase activity and simultaneously contains the substrate for Renilla luciferase, coelenterazine. This second reaction also emits photons upon oxidation of the substrate. Addition of substrates and light emission measurements were conducted automatically by the GLOMAX Luminometer.

References

Bruce A. Sherf, Shauna L. Navarro,Rita R. Hannah and Keith V. Dua l-LuciferaseTM Reporter Assay: An Advanced Co-Reporter Technology Integrating Firefly and Renilla Luciferase Assays. WoodPromega Notes Magazine Number 57, 1996, p.02

Consumables and Reagents

LumaPlate, PerkinElmer, catalogue number 6005630 Promega Dual-Luciferase® Reporter Assay System, catalogue number E1910

Instruments

Promega GLOMAX 96 Microplate Luminometer

References

Contents