Team:Edinburgh/Human

From 2010.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
 
(9 intermediate revisions not shown)
Line 29: Line 29:
<div id="nav">
<div id="nav">
-
<ul class="dropdown dropdown-horizontal" style="background: none;">
+
<ul class="dropdown dropdown-horizontal">
  <li><a href="http://2010.igem.org/Team:Edinburgh" class="dir">home</a>
  <li><a href="http://2010.igem.org/Team:Edinburgh" class="dir">home</a>
Line 50: Line 50:
   <li><a href="http://2010.igem.org/Team:Edinburgh/BioBricks#Genomic">submitted parts</a></li>
   <li><a href="http://2010.igem.org/Team:Edinburgh/BioBricks#Genomic">submitted parts</a></li>
   <li><a href="http://2010.igem.org/Team:Edinburgh/Results#Genomic">results</a></li>
   <li><a href="http://2010.igem.org/Team:Edinburgh/Results#Genomic">results</a></li>
-
   <li><a href="http://2010.igem.org/Team:Edinburgh/Project/Future">future work</a></li>
+
   <li><a href="http://2010.igem.org/Team:Edinburgh/Project/Future">the future</a></li>
   <li><a href="http://2010.igem.org/Team:Edinburgh/Project/References">references</a></li>
   <li><a href="http://2010.igem.org/Team:Edinburgh/Project/References">references</a></li>
   </ul>
   </ul>
Line 57: Line 57:
  <li><a href="http://2010.igem.org/Team:Edinburgh/Bacterial" class="dir">bacterial BRIDGEs</a>
  <li><a href="http://2010.igem.org/Team:Edinburgh/Bacterial" class="dir">bacterial BRIDGEs</a>
   <ul>
   <ul>
-
   <li><a href="http://2010.igem.org/Team:Edinburgh/Bacterial/Core_repressilator">the repressilator</a></li>
+
   <li><a href="http://2010.igem.org/Team:Edinburgh/Bacterial/Core_repressilator">the project</a></li>
   <li><a href="http://2010.igem.org/Team:Edinburgh/Bacterial/Red_light_producer">red light</a></li>
   <li><a href="http://2010.igem.org/Team:Edinburgh/Bacterial/Red_light_producer">red light</a></li>
   <li><a href="http://2010.igem.org/Team:Edinburgh/Bacterial/Red_light_sensor">red sensor</a></li>
   <li><a href="http://2010.igem.org/Team:Edinburgh/Bacterial/Red_light_sensor">red sensor</a></li>
Line 66: Line 66:
   <li><a href="http://2010.igem.org/Team:Edinburgh/BioBricks#Bacterial">submitted parts</a></li>
   <li><a href="http://2010.igem.org/Team:Edinburgh/BioBricks#Bacterial">submitted parts</a></li>
   <li><a href="http://2010.igem.org/Team:Edinburgh/Results#Bacterial">results</a></li>
   <li><a href="http://2010.igem.org/Team:Edinburgh/Results#Bacterial">results</a></li>
-
   <li><a href="http://2010.igem.org/Team:Edinburgh/Bacterial/Future">future work</a></li>
+
   <li><a href="http://2010.igem.org/Team:Edinburgh/Bacterial/Future">the future</a></li>
   <li><a href="http://2010.igem.org/Team:Edinburgh/Bacterial/References">references</a></li>
   <li><a href="http://2010.igem.org/Team:Edinburgh/Bacterial/References">references</a></li>
   </ul>
   </ul>
Line 77: Line 77:
   <li><a href="http://2010.igem.org/Team:Edinburgh/Modelling/Bacterial">the bacterial model</a></li>
   <li><a href="http://2010.igem.org/Team:Edinburgh/Modelling/Bacterial">the bacterial model</a></li>
   <li><a href="http://2010.igem.org/Team:Edinburgh/Modelling/Signalling">the signalling model</a></li>
   <li><a href="http://2010.igem.org/Team:Edinburgh/Modelling/Signalling">the signalling model</a></li>
 +
  <li><a href="http://2010.igem.org/Team:Edinburgh/Modelling/Tools">tools</a></li>
   <li><a href="http://2010.igem.org/Team:Edinburgh/Results#Modelling">results</a></li>
   <li><a href="http://2010.igem.org/Team:Edinburgh/Results#Modelling">results</a></li>
-
   <li><a href="http://2010.igem.org/Team:Edinburgh/Modelling/Future">future work</a></li>
+
   <li><a href="http://2010.igem.org/Team:Edinburgh/Modelling/Future">the future</a></li>
   <li><a href="http://2010.igem.org/Team:Edinburgh/Modelling/References">references</a></li>
   <li><a href="http://2010.igem.org/Team:Edinburgh/Modelling/References">references</a></li>
   </ul>
   </ul>
Line 85: Line 86:
  <li><a href="http://2010.igem.org/Team:Edinburgh/Human" class="dir">human BRIDGEs</a>
  <li><a href="http://2010.igem.org/Team:Edinburgh/Human" class="dir">human BRIDGEs</a>
   <ul>
   <ul>
-
  <li><a href="http://2010.igem.org/Team:Edinburgh/Human/Aspects">human aspects</a></li>
 
   <li><a href="http://2010.igem.org/Team:Edinburgh/Human/Communication">communication of science</a></li>
   <li><a href="http://2010.igem.org/Team:Edinburgh/Human/Communication">communication of science</a></li>
-
   <li><a href="http://2010.igem.org/Team:Edinburgh/Human/Terminology">terminology research</a></li>
+
   <li><a href="http://2010.igem.org/Team:Edinburgh/Human/Branding">iGEM survey</a></li>
-
  <li><a href="http://2010.igem.org/Team:Edinburgh/Human/Wiki">wiki</a></li>
+
   <li><a href="http://2010.igem.org/Team:Edinburgh/Human/Conversations">conversations</a></li>
   <li><a href="http://2010.igem.org/Team:Edinburgh/Human/Conversations">conversations</a></li>
-
  <li><a href="http://2010.igem.org/Team:Edinburgh/Human/Identity">identity</a></li>
 
-
  <li><a href="http://2010.igem.org/Team:Edinburgh/Human/Collaboration">collaboration</a></li>
 
-
  <li><a href="http://2010.igem.org/Team:Edinburgh/Human/Branding">branding research</a></li>
 
-
  <li><a href="http://2010.igem.org/Team:Edinburgh/Human/SciFi">science fiction writing</a></li>
 
-
  <li><a href="http://2010.igem.org/Team:Edinburgh/Human/FutureApps">future applications</a></li>
 
-
  <li><a href="http://2010.igem.org/Team:Edinburgh/Human/SelfReflection">self-reflection</a></li>
 
   <li><a href="http://2010.igem.org/Team:Edinburgh/Human/Epic">the epic</a></li>
   <li><a href="http://2010.igem.org/Team:Edinburgh/Human/Epic">the epic</a></li>
-
   <li><a href="http://2010.igem.org/Team:Edinburgh/Results#Human">results</a></li>
+
   <li><a href="http://2010.igem.org/Team:Edinburgh/Human/FutureApps">future applications</a></li>
-
   <li><a href="http://2010.igem.org/Team:Edinburgh/Human/Future">future work</a></li>
+
   <li><a href="http://2010.igem.org/Team:Edinburgh/Results#Human">further thoughts</a></li>
   <li><a href="http://2010.igem.org/Team:Edinburgh/Human/References">references</a></li>
   <li><a href="http://2010.igem.org/Team:Edinburgh/Human/References">references</a></li>
   </ul>
   </ul>
Line 106: Line 99:
   <ul>
   <ul>
   <li><a href="http://2010.igem.org/Team:Edinburgh/Notebook/Collaboration">collaboration</a></li>
   <li><a href="http://2010.igem.org/Team:Edinburgh/Notebook/Collaboration">collaboration</a></li>
 +
  <li><a href="http://2010.igem.org/Team:Edinburgh/Notebook/Attribution">attribution</a></li>
   <li><a href="http://2010.igem.org/Team:Edinburgh/Notebook/BRIDGE">BRIDGE</a></li>
   <li><a href="http://2010.igem.org/Team:Edinburgh/Notebook/BRIDGE">BRIDGE</a></li>
   <li><a href="http://2010.igem.org/Team:Edinburgh/Notebook/Red_light_producer">red light</a></li>
   <li><a href="http://2010.igem.org/Team:Edinburgh/Notebook/Red_light_producer">red light</a></li>
Line 111: Line 105:
   <li><a href="http://2010.igem.org/Team:Edinburgh/Notebook/Blue_light_producer">blue light</a></li>
   <li><a href="http://2010.igem.org/Team:Edinburgh/Notebook/Blue_light_producer">blue light</a></li>
   <li><a href="http://2010.igem.org/Team:Edinburgh/Notebook/Blue_light_sensor">blue sensor</a></li>
   <li><a href="http://2010.igem.org/Team:Edinburgh/Notebook/Blue_light_sensor">blue sensor</a></li>
 +
  <li><a href="http://2010.igem.org/Team:Edinburgh/Notebook/Green_light_producer">green light</a></li>
 +
  <li><a href="http://2010.igem.org/Team:Edinburgh/Notebook/Green_light_sensor">green sensor</a></li>
   <li><a href="http://2010.igem.org/Team:Edinburgh/Notebook/Modelling">modelling</a></li>
   <li><a href="http://2010.igem.org/Team:Edinburgh/Notebook/Modelling">modelling</a></li>
   <li><a href="http://2010.igem.org/Team:Edinburgh/Notebook/Safety">safety</a></li>
   <li><a href="http://2010.igem.org/Team:Edinburgh/Notebook/Safety">safety</a></li>
Line 133: Line 129:
<br>
<br>
-
<a name="Introduction" id="Introduction"></a><h2>Human BRIDGEs</h2>
+
<a name="Introduction" id="Introduction"></a><h2>Human BRIDGEs - Human practices</h2>
<br>
<br>
-
<center><table width="100%" border="0" cellspacing="0" style="background:transparent;">
+
<p>What happens within the <a href="http://2010.igem.org/Main_Page">iGEM</a> competition that doesn't involve <b>humans</b>?</p>
-
<tr>
+
 
-
  <td width="47%" style="vertical-align:top">
+
<p>Very little, is our <b>answer</b>.</p>
-
<p>What happens within the iGEM competition that doesn't involve humans?</p>
+
 
-
<p>Very little is my answer.</p>
+
<p>Therefore, what has relevance to <b>human practices</b>? Almost <b>everything</b>.</p>
-
<p>Therefore, what has relevance to human aspects? Almost everything.</p>
+
 
-
<p>Human aspects permeates throughout all parts of the iGEM competition, from the identities (in the broadest sense) of participants and the teams they are within to lab work to the decisions on project focus to the more obvious parts such as ethics.</p>
+
<p>Human practices <b>permeate</b> throughout all aspects of the iGEM <b>competition</b>, from the <b>identities</b> (in the broadest sense) of <b>participants</b> and the <b>teams</b> they are within, to the <b>decisions</b> on project focus and lab work, to the more obvious parts such as <b>ethics</b>.</p>
-
  </td>
+
 
-
  <td width="6%">
+
<p>iGEM is a <b>multidisciplinary</b> experience. This situation lends itself to the encouraging of <b>awareness</b> of other ways of thinking than what one is used to. Through the <b>interaction</b> of people from various <b>disciplines</b> the way in which one starts to perceive what one is doing from another <b>perspective</b>. We have furthered that <b>expansion</b> during our time within the <a href="http://2010.igem.org/Team:Edinburgh/Team">University of Edinburgh iGEM team</a> by <b>questioning</b> how we see things from ethics to themselves as <b>individuals</b>.</p><br>
-
  </td>
+
-
  <td width="47%" style="vertical-align:top">
+
-
<p>One thing I believe I'm good at is making people think.</p>
+
-
<p>iGEM is a multidisciplinary experience. This situation lends itself to the encouraging of awareness of other ways of thinking than what one is used to. Through the interaction of people from various disciplines the way in which one starts to perceive what one is doing from another perspective. I have furthered that expansion during my time within the University of Edinburgh iGEM team by questioning how the team sees things from ethics to themselves as individuals.</p>
+
-
  </td>
+
-
</tr>
+
-
</table></center>
+
-
+
-
<br>
+
<br>
<br>
<a name="Project" id="Project"></a><h2>Our Project</h2>
<a name="Project" id="Project"></a><h2>Our Project</h2>
<br>
<br>
-
<p>***</p><br>
+
<p>Throughout the <b>project</b>, we concentrated our human practices <b>efforts</b> on a number of key <b>elements</b> within iGEM. Firstly, we sought to promote <b>awareness</b> of the fact that human practices <b>permeate</b> throughout almost every <b>aspect</b> of the iGEM <b>competition</b>, from the <b>reasons</b> that people are involved to the <b>results</b> obtained. The bolded terms on the <b>wiki</b>, and the text in the boxes at the side of the page, are <b>indications</b> of this awareness.</p>
 +
 
 +
<p>Secondly, we stressed the <b>importance</b> of encouraging different ways of <b>thinking</b>, often stimulated through <b>self-reflection</b>. Every time we learnt something new, it was a form of self-reflection even if we were not always aware of it, and the more it was encouraged the more <b>possibilities</b> that were created. This ranged from making it easier to <b>communicate</b> and <b>collaborate</b> with other disciplines or individuals, to being <b>clearer</b> and therefore more <b>confident</b> about making decisions, and even the <b>understanding</b> of others, their points of view, and their cultures. The <b>multidisciplinary nature</b> of iGEM lends itself to these analyses easily.</p>
 +
 
 +
<p>We also approached a number of other issues, such as that of <b>collaboration</b> versus <b>competition</b>, and how the two are not always mutually inclusive... the tension that may occur when collaboration is enforced on teams competing with one another for prestigious prizes is something that was very interesting to observe and document.</p>
 +
 
 +
<p>So many <b>insights</b> can be taken from this <b>multidisciplinary</b>, <b>multicultural</b> and <b>global</b> phenomenon that is iGEM if it is approached in the right way. <b>We</b> think differently now, how about <b>you</b>?</p><br>
<br>
<br>
Line 166: Line 159:
<ul>
<ul>
  <li>
  <li>
-
<a href=""></a>
+
<a href="http://2010.igem.org/Team:Edinburgh/Human/Communication">Investigating perceptions of synthetic biology from outwith the community, and how the discipline is perceived.</a>
  </li>
  </li>
  <li>
  <li>
-
<a href=""></a>
+
<a href="http://2010.igem.org/Team:Edinburgh/Human/Branding">Investigating perceptions of iGEM within the community, and how the competition is perceived.</a>
  </li>
  </li>
  <li>
  <li>
-
<a href=""></a>
+
<a href="http://2010.igem.org/Team:Edinburgh/Human/Conversations">Just some of the more interesting conversations we had over the summer.</a>
  </li>
  </li>
  <li>
  <li>
-
<a href=""></a>
+
<a href="http://2010.igem.org/Team:Edinburgh/Human/Epic">An epic tale of how a group of synthetic biologists suddenly turned author.</a>
  </li>
  </li>
  <li>
  <li>
-
<a href="http://2010.igem.org/Team:Edinburgh/Results#Human">A summary of what we achieved through the construction and analysis of our models.</a>
+
<a href="http://2010.igem.org/Team:Edinburgh/Human/FutureApps">Investigating future applications of our project from a human practices point of view.</a>
  </li>
  </li>
  <li>
  <li>
-
<a href="http://2010.igem.org/Team:Edinburgh/Human/Future">Our vision of the future of the human aspects of synthetic biology, and where we would like to go next.</a>
+
<a href="http://2010.igem.org/Team:Edinburgh/Results#Human">A summary of what we achieved through the human practices component of our project.</a>
  </li>
  </li>
  <li>
  <li>
Line 193: Line 186:
<center><a href="#top" class="dir"><img width="100" src="http://2010.igem.org/wiki/images/9/9f/Ed10-RTT.png"></a></center>
<center><a href="#top" class="dir"><img width="100" src="http://2010.igem.org/wiki/images/9/9f/Ed10-RTT.png"></a></center>
 +
 +
</div>
 +
 +
<div id="windowbox" style="border: .2em solid #660000; padding: 5px; position:fixed; top:50%; right:30px; width:8%;">
 +
<span style="color:ivory;">Throughout this wiki there are words in <b>bold</b> that indicate a relevance to <b>human aspects</b>. It will become obvious that <b>human aspects</b> are a part of almost everything in <b>iGEM</b>.</span>
</div>
</div>

Latest revision as of 03:04, 28 October 2010







Human BRIDGEs - Human practices


What happens within the iGEM competition that doesn't involve humans?

Very little, is our answer.

Therefore, what has relevance to human practices? Almost everything.

Human practices permeate throughout all aspects of the iGEM competition, from the identities (in the broadest sense) of participants and the teams they are within, to the decisions on project focus and lab work, to the more obvious parts such as ethics.

iGEM is a multidisciplinary experience. This situation lends itself to the encouraging of awareness of other ways of thinking than what one is used to. Through the interaction of people from various disciplines the way in which one starts to perceive what one is doing from another perspective. We have furthered that expansion during our time within the University of Edinburgh iGEM team by questioning how we see things from ethics to themselves as individuals.



Our Project


Throughout the project, we concentrated our human practices efforts on a number of key elements within iGEM. Firstly, we sought to promote awareness of the fact that human practices permeate throughout almost every aspect of the iGEM competition, from the reasons that people are involved to the results obtained. The bolded terms on the wiki, and the text in the boxes at the side of the page, are indications of this awareness.

Secondly, we stressed the importance of encouraging different ways of thinking, often stimulated through self-reflection. Every time we learnt something new, it was a form of self-reflection even if we were not always aware of it, and the more it was encouraged the more possibilities that were created. This ranged from making it easier to communicate and collaborate with other disciplines or individuals, to being clearer and therefore more confident about making decisions, and even the understanding of others, their points of view, and their cultures. The multidisciplinary nature of iGEM lends itself to these analyses easily.

We also approached a number of other issues, such as that of collaboration versus competition, and how the two are not always mutually inclusive... the tension that may occur when collaboration is enforced on teams competing with one another for prestigious prizes is something that was very interesting to observe and document.

So many insights can be taken from this multidisciplinary, multicultural and global phenomenon that is iGEM if it is approached in the right way. We think differently now, how about you?



Table of Contents





Throughout this wiki there are words in bold that indicate a relevance to human aspects. It will become obvious that human aspects are a part of almost everything in iGEM.