Team:UPO-Sevilla/Notebook/09 22

From 2010.igem.org

Revision as of 21:15, 26 October 2010 by Paola (Talk | contribs)

September, 22nd

Assay Team

We analyzed the plates we spread the day before. In the half of them there was no colonies. It seemed that thin needles could not arrive the medium with bacteria.

We started another chemotaxis assay: testing the chemotaxis behavior of Pseudomonas putida KT2442. We used three chemotaxis chambers. Also in each cubicle there were two needles, one with chemoattractant and other with the same buffer that there was in the medium (control). Thin and thick needle were in different lines of the chambers to test the perfect conditions.

  • Chamber 1: Aspartate as attractant.

      1mM 10mM 100mM
    thin needle
    A        C
    A        C
    A        C
    thick needle
    A        C
    A        C
    A        C
  • Chamber 2: Salicylate as attractant.

      1mM 10mM 100mM
    thin needle
    S        C
    S        C
    S        C
    thick needle
    S        C
    S        C
    S        C
  • Chamber 3: We read that E. coli K12 expelled aspartate in a medium with enough succinate. We wanted to test this, so we set up E. coli K12 inocula in minimal medium with succinate and in minimal medium with glucose. Then we picked up the overnatant of those inocula and used it like an attractant in needled. We used two controls: overnatant of glutamate grown E. coli K12 and minimal medium with succinate.

      Overnatant of E. coli K12 in MM + Succ Overnatant of E. coli K12 in MM + Glu MM + Succ
    thin needle
    att        C
    att        C
    att        C
    thick needle
    att        C
    att        C
    att        C

Bactera of the medium in the chemotaxis chambers were at 0’07 of optic density (OD). We gave one hour to the bacteria to get into the needles. Then we spread 102 and 104 dilutions of the needles content in LB plates. It was grown over night at 30ºC.

Go to 21st of September Go to 23rd of September
Return to Notebook

Footer