Team:TU Delft/Brainstorming/HRS

From 2010.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
(New page: {{:Team:TU_Delft/Header}} {{:Team:TU_Delft/Brainstorming/HRS_content}})
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{:Team:TU_Delft/Header}}
{{:Team:TU_Delft/Header}}
{{:Team:TU_Delft/Brainstorming/HRS_content}}
{{:Team:TU_Delft/Brainstorming/HRS_content}}
 +
{{:Team:TU_Delft/Footer}}

Latest revision as of 11:08, 17 May 2010

Hugo's Risk Scale

Our own standard for project risk assessment. Risk is represented with a value from 0 (no risk) to 10 (very risky)

  • 0: Lac operon (or other piece of cake) + our biobrick
  • 1: Less than 5 genes or biobricks (copy-paste) + our biobrick
  • 2: Less than 10 genes or biobricks (copy-paste) + our biobrick
  • 3: Biobrick engineering <5, improvement of things already done
  • 4: Multi biobrick engineering >5, improvement of things already done
  • 5: Site directed mutagenesis of several genes, results unknown a priori
  • 6: Evolutionary engineering involved = sequencing
  • 7: Protein engineering involved, results unknown a priori
  • 8: A lot of genes and/or biobricks (>20), known genes in other species and characterized. Stress, social friction
  • 9: A lot of genes and/or biobricks (>20), Known genes in other species, not fully characterized. Start a project one-eyed = stress, social friction, high chances of collapse
  • 10: A lot of genes (>20), Unknown genes= characterization + sequencing + cloning. Start a project from nothing or partially blind, team-member losses + obituraries. Good side: paper in Nature or Nobel