Team:Stockholm/2 October 2010

From 2010.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
(New page: {{Stockholm/Top2}} ==Andreas==)
Line 1: Line 1:
-
{{Stockholm/Top2}}
 
==Andreas==
==Andreas==
 +
===Transfer of nCPP⋅SOD⋅His.RBS.yCCS operon to pEX===
 +
''Continued from 30/8 transformations''
 +
====Colony PCR====
 +
#<u>BL21</u> pEX.nLMWP&sdot;SOD&sdot;His: A & B
 +
#<u>BL21</u> pEX.nTra10&sdot;SOD&sdot;His: A & B
 +
#pEX.nTAT&sdot;SOD&sdot;His.RBS.yCCS 2: A & B
 +
#pEX.nTAT&sdot;SOD&sdot;His.RBS.yCCS 3: A & B
 +
#pEX.nTra10&sdot;SOD&sdot;His.RBS.yCCS 1: A & B
 +
#pEX.nTra10&sdot;SOD&sdot;His.RBS.yCCS 2: A & B
 +
#pEX.nLMWP&sdot;SOD&sdot;His.RBS.yCCS 2: A & B
 +
#pEX.nLMWP&sdot;SOD&sdot;His.RBS.yCCS 3: A & B
 +
 +
Standard colony PCR settings.
 +
*Elongation time: 2:00
 +
 +
====Gel verification====
 +
0.8 % agarose, 100 V
 +
 +
'''Expected bands:'''
 +
#744 bp
 +
#765 bp
 +
#1523 bp
 +
#1523 bp
 +
#1553 bp
 +
#1553 bp
 +
#1532 bp
 +
#1532 bp
 +
 +
'''Results'''<br />
 +
Ran gel a little too long too see correct clones of constructs '''1''' and '''2'''. For the other it looks like many clones have double inserts, probably a result of too high insert:vector ratio during ligation.
 +
 +
Confirmed clones:
 +
#-
 +
#-
 +
#A
 +
#B
 +
#-
 +
#-
 +
#B
 +
#B
 +
 +
These will be saved for later.

Revision as of 15:26, 2 October 2010

Contents

Andreas

Transfer of nCPP⋅SOD⋅His.RBS.yCCS operon to pEX

Continued from 30/8 transformations

Colony PCR

  1. BL21 pEX.nLMWP⋅SOD⋅His: A & B
  2. BL21 pEX.nTra10⋅SOD⋅His: A & B
  3. pEX.nTAT⋅SOD⋅His.RBS.yCCS 2: A & B
  4. pEX.nTAT⋅SOD⋅His.RBS.yCCS 3: A & B
  5. pEX.nTra10⋅SOD⋅His.RBS.yCCS 1: A & B
  6. pEX.nTra10⋅SOD⋅His.RBS.yCCS 2: A & B
  7. pEX.nLMWP⋅SOD⋅His.RBS.yCCS 2: A & B
  8. pEX.nLMWP⋅SOD⋅His.RBS.yCCS 3: A & B

Standard colony PCR settings.

  • Elongation time: 2:00

Gel verification

0.8 % agarose, 100 V

Expected bands:

  1. 744 bp
  2. 765 bp
  3. 1523 bp
  4. 1523 bp
  5. 1553 bp
  6. 1553 bp
  7. 1532 bp
  8. 1532 bp

Results
Ran gel a little too long too see correct clones of constructs 1 and 2. For the other it looks like many clones have double inserts, probably a result of too high insert:vector ratio during ligation.

Confirmed clones:

  1. -
  2. -
  3. A
  4. B
  5. -
  6. -
  7. B
  8. B

These will be saved for later.