Team:Cambridge/turingpatterns

From 2010.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
(Research of the previous Team's work)
Line 10: Line 10:
* Apparently 11 out of 12 ligations were successful - they would have been able to test the system had the final ligation occurred.  
* Apparently 11 out of 12 ligations were successful - they would have been able to test the system had the final ligation occurred.  
* The only experimental results were those demonstrating that AHL was initiating it's own transcription via the expression of GFP.
* The only experimental results were those demonstrating that AHL was initiating it's own transcription via the expression of GFP.
-
* Seemed to have done quite a lot of modelling work.
+
* Seemed to have done quite a lot of good modelling work. So will be difficult to go much further on this aspect of the project
iGEM 2008 Cambridge team - iBrain
iGEM 2008 Cambridge team - iBrain
* Planned to use similar quorum sensing mechanisms with the lux operon to detect activity. However, the lux operon would not work in a gram positive organism such as Bacillus therefore only E.coli could work.
* Planned to use similar quorum sensing mechanisms with the lux operon to detect activity. However, the lux operon would not work in a gram positive organism such as Bacillus therefore only E.coli could work.
 +
==Papers on Turing patterns==
 +
 +
* Original paper from Alan Turing: http://www.dna.caltech.edu/courses/cs191/paperscs191/turing.pdf
 +
 +
==Conclusion==
 +
 +
* Turing patterns have been well described theoretically
 +
* Mexico 2009 modelled the problem extensively
 +
* Our project WILL have to reach the implementation stage to go a step further
 +
* Combine with one of the other projects? Bioluminescence?
{{:Team:Cambridge/Templates/footer}}
{{:Team:Cambridge/Templates/footer}}

Revision as of 09:25, 15 July 2010