Team:Cambridge/turingpatterns

From 2010.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
(Research of the previous Team's work)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
{{:Team:Cambridge/Templates/header}}
 +
==Research of the previous Team's work==
==Research of the previous Team's work==
Line 8: Line 10:
* Apparently 11 out of 12 ligations were successful - they would have been able to test the system had the final ligation occurred.  
* Apparently 11 out of 12 ligations were successful - they would have been able to test the system had the final ligation occurred.  
* The only experimental results were those demonstrating that AHL was initiating it's own transcription via the expression of GFP.
* The only experimental results were those demonstrating that AHL was initiating it's own transcription via the expression of GFP.
 +
* Seemed to have done quite a lot of modelling work.
iGEM 2008 Cambridge team - iBrain
iGEM 2008 Cambridge team - iBrain
* Planned to use similar quorum sensing mechanisms with the lux operon to detect activity. However, the lux operon would not work in a gram positive organism such as Bacillus therefore only E.coli could work.
* Planned to use similar quorum sensing mechanisms with the lux operon to detect activity. However, the lux operon would not work in a gram positive organism such as Bacillus therefore only E.coli could work.
 +
 +
{{:Team:Cambridge/Templates/footer}}
{{:Team:Cambridge/Templates/footer}}

Revision as of 09:10, 15 July 2010