"
Team:Cambridge/turingpatterns
From 2010.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
Hannahcopley (Talk | contribs) (New page: Research of the previous Team's work: iGEM Mexico 2007 * Project Failed * Admitted were underfunded, no results shown iGEM Mexico 2009 * Apparently 11 out of 12 ligations were success...) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| - | Research of the previous Team's work | + | ==Research of the previous Team's work== |
iGEM Mexico 2007 | iGEM Mexico 2007 | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
iGEM 2008 Cambridge team - iBrain | iGEM 2008 Cambridge team - iBrain | ||
* Planned to use similar quorum sensing mechanisms with the lux operon to detect activity. However, the lux operon would not work in a gram positive organism such as Bacillus therefore only E.coli could work. | * Planned to use similar quorum sensing mechanisms with the lux operon to detect activity. However, the lux operon would not work in a gram positive organism such as Bacillus therefore only E.coli could work. | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{:Team:Cambridge/Templates/footer}} | ||
Revision as of 09:03, 15 July 2010
Research of the previous Team's work
iGEM Mexico 2007
- Project Failed
- Admitted were underfunded, no results shown
iGEM Mexico 2009
- Apparently 11 out of 12 ligations were successful - they would have been able to test the system had the final ligation occurred.
- The only experimental results were those demonstrating that AHL was initiating it's own transcription via the expression of GFP.
iGEM 2008 Cambridge team - iBrain
- Planned to use similar quorum sensing mechanisms with the lux operon to detect activity. However, the lux operon would not work in a gram positive organism such as Bacillus therefore only E.coli could work.
