Team:Cambridge/Bioluminescence/Luciferin Regeneration

From 2010.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
(Our Experiments)
Line 15: Line 15:
We tested both the ''L. cruciata'' and ''P. pyralis'' luciferases with and without LRE on our plate reader, kindly on loan from [http://www.bmglabtech.com/ BMG Labtech]. The results showed that when D-cysteine was added to the reaction, the light output was brighter and lasted for longer. This proved that both the working of LRE to produce CHBT and the conversion of CHBT into luciferin worked as expected.  
We tested both the ''L. cruciata'' and ''P. pyralis'' luciferases with and without LRE on our plate reader, kindly on loan from [http://www.bmglabtech.com/ BMG Labtech]. The results showed that when D-cysteine was added to the reaction, the light output was brighter and lasted for longer. This proved that both the working of LRE to produce CHBT and the conversion of CHBT into luciferin worked as expected.  
-
However, the conversion from CHBT to luciferin via L-luciferin by adding L-cysteine was found to not work.
+
However, the conversion from CHBT to luciferin via L-luciferin by adding L-cysteine was found not to work. Our research suggested that overexpression of thioesterase might help to make this possible, unfortunately our attempts to PCR out the E. coli thioesterase were not successful.
{{:Team:Cambridge/Templates/footer}}
{{:Team:Cambridge/Templates/footer}}

Revision as of 23:28, 25 October 2010