|
Introduction to Synthetic Promoter Libraries
Modulation of gene expression of i.e. cellular enzyme activities (Solem and Jensen 2002), as well as regulation of transcription are amongst some of the areas where SPLs are currently being used. SPL provides an alternative method for gene regulation compared to older methods, namely those of gene knockouts and strong over expression. These two methods are usually based upon apparent rate limiting steps within metabolic pathways (Jensen and Hammer 1998).
When working with gene regulation, it is important to elucidate where expression levels are optimal for the given gene being worked on. Under these specifications it is essential to be able to have slight increments in expressional strength when attempting to optimize gene expression. This can be achieved by the usage of an SPL, where the variability in strengths can be achieved by either randomizing the spacer sequences, namely the 17 bases that reside between the -35 and -10 consensus regions, and/or some of the bases within the consensus regions, being the -35 and -10 regions.
The spacer sequences that surround the consensus regions contribute significantly to the strengths of promoters (Hammer et al. 2006). In our design, we decided to both randomize the spacer sequences as well as two bases in both consensus regions as seen in Figure 1 below. N stands for 25% each of A, C, G and T, while S stands for 50% each of C and G, and W stands for 50% A and T.
Table 1: illustrates the Tm of the SPL primers. IDT DNA oligo analyzer was used in order to calculate the Tm.
Primer | Tm - °C |
I) Primer SPL Suffix-F | 62.1 |
II) Primer SPL Prefix-R-01 | 59.8 |
III) Primer SPL Prefix-R-02 | 60 |
Table 2
PCR substrates | Volumes - μL |
Total volume | 50 |
Phusion Polymerase (0,02 U/μL) | 0.5 |
x5 Phusion HF buffer | 10 |
dNTP's (5μM) | 2 |
Primer SPL Suffix-F (10μM) | 1.25 |
Template - BioBrick plasmid backbone | 1 |
ddH2O | 33.5 |
Table 3
Cycle step | Temperature - ºC | Time | Cycles |
Initial denaturation | 98 | 30 sec | 1 |
Denaturation | 98 | 10 sec | - |
Annealing | 63* | 30 sec | 20-25 |
Extension | 72 | 30 sec / kb | - |
Final extension | 72 | 10 min | 1 |
Hold | 4 | forever | 1 |
Table 4: Prefix SPL primers that SHOULD be used depending on which BioBrick plamid backbone is selected for amplification is illustrated.
BioBrick Plasmid Backbone | Primer II | Primer III | Sizes - bps |
pSB1A3 | + | - | 2157 |
pSB1AC3 | + | - | 3055 |
pSB1AK3 | + | - | 3189 |
pSB1AT3 | + | - | 3446 |
pSB1C3 | + | - | 2072 |
pSB1K3 | + | - | 2206 |
pSB1T3 | + | - | 2463 |
pSB2K3 | + | - | 4425 |
pSB3C5 | - | + | 2738 |
pSB3K5 | - | + | 2936 |
pSB3T5 | - | + | 3252 |
pSB4A5 | - | + | 3395 |
pSB4C5 | - | + | 3221 |
pSB4K5 | - | + | 3419 |
pSB4T5 | - | + | 3735 |
|
|