Team:Stockholm/21 August 2010

From 2010.igem.org

Revision as of 17:14, 22 August 2010 by AndreasConstantinou (Talk | contribs)

Home Project Idea Lab Work Results Modelling Team       Follow us on and        2010.igem.org

↳   Notebook Safety Protocols


Contents


Hassan

found some extra articles for gene-regulatory networks: [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17504165] and [http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/8/S6/S9]

Andreas

Assembly of CPP⋅protein⋅His constructs

Assembly of His⋅SOD/yCCS and SOD/yCCS⋅His into pSB1K3

Step I in cloning strategy (19/8)

Transformation results
  • pSB1K3.SOD⋅His
  • pSB1K3.yCCS⋅His
  • pSB1K3.His⋅SOD
  • pSB1K3.His⋅yCCS

Good yield on all plates.

Colony PCR

Three white colonies picked from each plate for verification.

  • pSB1K3.SOD⋅His: 1=A1, 2=A2, 3=A3
  • pSB1K3.yCCS⋅His: 1=A4, 2=A5, 3=A6
  • pSB1K3.His⋅SOD: 1=A7, 2=A8, 3=A9
  • pSB1K3.His⋅yCCS: 1=A10, 2=A11, 3=A12
  • Blank: A13

Procedures as described in colony PCR protocol.

  • Forward primer: VF2
  • Reverse primer: VR
  • Elongation time: 2:00
Gel verification
Gel verification of pEX.RFP constructs and pEX vector.
Loading: λ, J1, J8, J2, J3, J4, J5, J6, J7, λ
3 μl λ, 4 μl sample. λ = O'GeneRuler 1 kb DNA ladder.

1 % agarose, 90 V, 1 h.

Expected bands:

  • pEX.RFP: 1272 bp
  • pEX (w/ insert): 1414 bp

Results:
The fragments seen for samples J1 and J2 are considerably shorter (≈850 bp) than the expected 1272 bp, making it very unlikely that they contain the full-length RFP cassettes. This is strange, since the colonies picked were indeed red, obviously expressing RFP.
The results from pEX vector samples are also quite strange. The pEX clone (J4) resulted in a band corresponding well to the expected 1414 bp. However, the pEX plasmid (J5) does not result in any band whatsoever.
A new gel will be run and possibly a new transfer of RFP to pEX attempted.

Transfer of RFP to pEX

Continued from 19/8

Colony PCR

Since the gel results from 20/8 only verified pMA.His, a new colony PCR was run to verify pEX and pEX.RFP. Two new clones (5 & 6) of pEX.RFP were picked and run with clones 2 and 3 from 20/8. To test whether the red colonies could possibly be from pSB1K3 (i.e. if the selection didn't work properly), pEX.RFP 2 was also amplified with pSB primer VF2 and VR.
Also, pEX plasmid was amplified in parallel with pEX plasmid to compare the insert sizes.

  • J1: pEX.RFP 2
  • J8: pEX.RFP 3
  • J2: pEX.RFP 5
  • J3: pEX.RFP 6
  • J4: pEX clone
  • J5: pEX plasmid
  • J6: pEX.RFP 2 (w/ pSB primers)
  • J7: Blank

Procedures as described in colony PCR protocol:

  • Forward primer: pEXf or pSB VF2
  • Reverse primer: pEXr or pSB VR
  • Elongation: 2:00
Gel verification

To be added

Colony re-streak

In order to verify that our red colonies are indeed carrying pEX and not pSB1K3 (i.e. the Amp selection has failed), resulting in false-positives for transfer of RFP from pSB1K3 to pEX, clones 2, 3, 5 and 6 were streaked on quarters of Amp 100 and Km 50 plates. Plates incubated 48 h in 37 °C.
If RFP has been successfully transfered to pEX, the clones should only grow on Amp 100 plates.

Retrieved from "http://2010.igem.org/Team:Stockholm/21_August_2010"