Team:ETHZ Basel/Modeling/Movement

From 2010.igem.org

Revision as of 10:38, 8 October 2010 by Georgerosenberger (Talk | contribs)

Modeling of the bacterial movement

Schematical overview of the relation between chemotaxis and the movement model.
1000$
BACTERIAL ARTWORK FOR SALE
Sketch for a possible implementation of the controller.

Analogous to the highly complex signal transduction in chemotaxis there is an equally extensive system on side of the flagella, which is even lower understood. As the movement model is only set up in order to close the feedback chain for testing purposes, a phenomenological implementation will be sufficient.
Brief descriptions about the statistics of E. coli movement can be found in the literature section and therefore the model will be a stochastical one.

A first implementation was performed by linking the CheYp concentration to the probability of being in the run or tumbling state. These two states either describe the movement and the reorientation as difference equations that can be evaluated at discrete time points. Based on literature statistics about the distribution of change in angle due to tumbling a weibull distribution was selected:

Chosen weibull distribution.

To represent the probability density function it is transformed into a vector that has a frequency of elements that corresponds to the relation of probabilities of the function.

Frequency of elements in the vector.

The reorientation happens by selecting a random element of the vector giving the new change in angle. The walks for a thousand steps at different constant CheYp concentrations are shown below:
At a CheYp concentration of 0 the probability for running is about 98%.

A random walk at CheYp = 0 [nM].

At CheYp = 12.5 [nM] both states are equally probable.

A random walk at CheYp = 12.5 [nM].

At CheYp = 25 [nM] tumbling is dominant.

A random walk at CheYp = 25 [nM].

Here is the check of change of angele at 25 [nM] for 1e5 steps:

Check of angle distribution.