"
Team:ETHZ Basel/Modeling/Stochastic Simulations
From 2010.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
(New page: {{ETHZ_Basel10}} ==Stochastic Simulations for E-Lemming== ===Introduction === === Stochastic Simulation Tools/Algorithms === ==== StochSim ====...) |
(→Stochastic Simulations for E-Lemming) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ETHZ_Basel10}} | {{ETHZ_Basel10}} | ||
| - | + | {{ETHZ_Basel10}} | |
| - | == | + | ==Open Issues== |
| + | ===Debating Questions=== | ||
| + | Why would stochastic simulation (on the molecular level) be good:<br> | ||
| + | • It sounds more cool than ODE – based models;<br> | ||
| + | • It generally gives (or at least it should give) a more realistic view of the biological process studied;<br> | ||
| + | • Individual complexes could be traced all through the simulation (not sure if we’d ever need that; probably not).<br><br> | ||
| - | + | Why would stochastic simulation (on the molecular level) not be of interest:<br> | |
| + | • In terms of the results, the predicted values of the models fluctuate around the deterministically obtained ones, with fluctuations amplitude indirectly proportional to population size (number of molecules). | ||
| + | <br> | ||
| - | == | + | ==Existing Stochastic Models== |
| - | ==== | + | ===Introduction=== |
| + | |||
| + | ===StochSim=== | ||
Revision as of 02:29, 2 August 2010
Open Issues
Debating Questions
Why would stochastic simulation (on the molecular level) be good:
• It sounds more cool than ODE – based models;
• It generally gives (or at least it should give) a more realistic view of the biological process studied;
• Individual complexes could be traced all through the simulation (not sure if we’d ever need that; probably not).
Why would stochastic simulation (on the molecular level) not be of interest:
• In terms of the results, the predicted values of the models fluctuate around the deterministically obtained ones, with fluctuations amplitude indirectly proportional to population size (number of molecules).
