Team:Michigan/Quorum Sensing
From 2010.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
(→7/25/10) |
(→Quorum Sensing Team) |
||
Line 198: | Line 198: | ||
--[[User:Infekt|Infekt]] 17:49, 25 July 2010 (UTC) | --[[User:Infekt|Infekt]] 17:49, 25 July 2010 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | == 7/26/10 == | ||
+ | ''Alex and Marcus'' | ||
+ | {yesterday, Josh and Charlie removed stuff from the autoclave] | ||
+ | Analyzed yesterday's W3110 culture on Lin microplate reader | ||
+ | *endpoint - cuvette - Ex 450nm, Em 520nm, cutoff 515nm (GFP settings) | ||
+ | **blank: 91.591 RFU | ||
+ | **W3110: 117.47 RFU | ||
+ | *fixed Ex 450nm - Em spectrum scan - cuvette | ||
+ | **W3110 - Em peak = 520nm (green - good) | ||
+ | *fixed Em 520nm - Ex spec scan - cuvette | ||
+ | **W3110 - Ex peak = 370nm (wtf) - still good emission at Ex 450nm | ||
+ | *fixed Ex 370 - Em spec scan - cuvette | ||
+ | **W3110 - Em peak = 450nm (wtf) | ||
+ | *endpoint - cuvette - Ex 370nm - Em 450nm | ||
+ | **W3110: 1054.9 RFU | ||
+ | **blank: 1934.6 RFU | ||
+ | ***''This is some kind of background - very high readings, but the blank is higher than the sample - maybe the GFP in the sample is reabsorbing at 450nm?? At any rate, there appears to be GFP, as expected, and we can probably use Ex 450nm and Em 520nm to detect it.'' |
Revision as of 23:01, 26 July 2010